Neuroprivacy and the legal implications of brain
- If you want to skip the leader and go straight to the
subject re: Neuroprivacy..skip down to the == marks
Oi Gavolt! What a 6.7 months this has been! All that
has been going on and without my big mouth sounding
***My Child support battles in court etc.
****My Poverty smirks ( as usual )
***The Usual thing at my secret Stanford Labs
***Talks at Stanford about Google secretly being
run/controlled by the Pentagon's agenda.
*** DARPA and other military granting organizations
that are politically sensitive to what the researchers
say about them such that they may pull your grant if
they catch you bad-mouthing IRAQ on a blog somewhere.
Pentagon having a "dis-informatzia department". At
Nasa JPL a lot of our projects are now classified as
secret - no matter what the subject and taken out of
the hands of people who are not politically "favored"!
***the most amazing Legal career and powerbroker, New
York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer - who is
actually dictating policy to businesses. ( get that
you laissez faire types?) He's making them act
responsibly (or else!)
The equally amazing political career of a certain
Virginia governor (Clinton-esque)
Oh yea...have any of you made comments on a potential
hydrogen economy's chances or noted the frightening
fact that oil companies ( major ) have stopped doing
explorations for almost 6-7 years now? How come?
What's the connection between Corporations
deliberately hurting people in East St. Louis,
Illinois' minority population. (Political
environmental pollution as genocide?)
...and George Bush's paramour in the political arena
Condoleeza blossoming into a true fascist-in-waiting!
Anyone check out Kurzweil's new book about
"Singularities" iz on the way? ( sounds pluralistic!)
How 'bout the two missing probes around mars? Were
they lost in the same region? Is there a Bermuda
triangle on Mars?
I know you don't like me talking about this but
business and legal contracts count as technology as
well as iPODS. Given that - did any of you read or
hear the latest almost post-mortem on the constitution
by Dr. Lawrence Tribe ( Mr. Constitutional Law
himself?) After all silicon valley's jealous grab on
"innovation" takes place in a democratic environment.
Tribe seems to think the constitution's days are
numbered in this country. I HAD the letter but
yahoo.fr deleted it cause I didn't touch my email for
I'm trying to pull it out of the Paris,France or
London England database again or from an anonymous
constitutional lawyer friend.
I may have to clear it with MARK Finnern about the
ramifications of posting a private letter that may or
may not be in the originator's desire or interest to
Oh yea...recent decision by courts: Cell phone usage
in public can't be deemed a non private conversation (
therby not subject to a court order) but still
agencies must get a judge's order before using
location technology on a cell phone anyway since the
call could be occuring in private circumstances ( you
know like at home?).
This stems out of the Ryders on the Telecommunications
bill Bill Clinton signed that allowed phone tappingw
w/o a court order and Bush's enhancement to locating
and seizing the person if one of the participants in
the conversation is a suspect for something that could
be LOOSELY interpreted as a terrorist act!
Can the quality of tests or what they mesure be wholly
arbitrary and even ridiculous? Example: Former Dean
of Stanford Law and Harvard Law Whiz kid Kathleen
Sulllivan failed to pass her bar exam in California.
So have a lot of top lawyers. Is designing a test that
hardly anyone can pass a failure on the part of the
tester or the stupidity of the designer? If so, what
does that say about SAT and achievement tests and the
testing going on in the K-12 systems of the USA, the
criterion of the book: The Bell Curve, arguments
against quotas and affirmative action, Republicans
trying to quash statistic gathering on subjects they
don't approve of, and other supposed mean-and-ends
Did Arthur Koestler, in the book Darkness at Noon sum
up the horrors of inaappropriate means justifying the
ends--even in a testing situation as "a useful lie is
better than a harmful truth?"..but then in whose
Neuroprivacy and the legal implications of brain
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com
- On 05-Dec-05, at PM 06:41, Joschka Fisher wrote:
> ***the most amazing Legal career and powerbroker, NewI don't understand this comment. "laissez-faire" types would have no
> York State Attorney General Elliot Spitzer - who is
> actually dictating policy to businesses. ( get that
> you laissez faire types?) He's making them act
> responsibly (or else!)
problem with prosecuting fraud cases. Things like government granted
monopolies and business subsidies (state mercantilism), government
dictated price fixing and government managed social engineering
projects are the sorts of policies that laissez-faire economists take