Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Mom's Care Can Alter DNA of Her Offspring

Expand Messages
  • Michael Korns
    Mellow or Stressed? Mom s Care Can Alter DNA of Her Offspring Wall Street Journal Science Page July 16, 2004 If anyone out there still believes that DNA is
    Message 1 of 3 , Jul 19, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      Mellow or Stressed?
      Mom's Care Can Alter
      DNA of Her Offspring
      Wall Street Journal Science Page
      July 16, 2004

      If anyone out there still believes that DNA is destiny and that
      claims to the contrary are so much bleeding-heart, PC drivel (my
      favorite is that parents' treatment of their children has no effect
      on their character, beliefs, behavior or values), neuroscientist
      Michael Meaney has some rats he'd like you to meet.

      Since the 1990s, he and his colleagues at McGill University,
      Montreal, have been documenting how mother rats affect their
      offspring (dads don't stick around to raise the kids). Now they have
      scored what neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky of Stanford University,
      Palo Alto, Calif., calls "a tour de force": proof that a mother's
      behavior causes lifelong changes in her offspring's DNA.

      A decade ago Prof. Meaney noticed that newborn rats whose mothers
      rarely lick and groom them grow up... well, there is a fancy
      biochemical description for it, but let's just say that they grow up
      a bit of a neurotic mess. Pups of attentive moms grow up less
      fearful, more curious, mellower.

      Prof. Meaney and his team then showed that this wasn't a case of
      mellow moms having mellow kids and neglectful moms having maladjusted
      kids, as the DNA-as-destiny crowd would have it. When the scientists
      switch around the newborns so that rat pups born to attentive moms
      are reared by standoffish moms, the pups grow up to be extremely
      stressed out, nearly jumping out of their skins at the slightest
      stress. Pups born to standoffish moms but reared by attentive ones
      grow up to be less fearful, more curious, more laid-back, taking
      stress in stride.

      Rearing, it turns out, affects molecules in the brain that catch hold
      of stress hormones. Licking and grooming increases the number of
      these receptors. The more such receptors the brain has in the region
      called the hippocampus, the fewer stress hormones are released; the
      fewer the stress hormones coursing through its body, the mellower the
      rat.

      It turns out that all newborn rats have a molecular silencer on their
      stress-receptor gene. In rats reared by standoffish mothers, the
      silencer remains attached, the scientists will report in the August
      issue of Nature Neuroscience. As a result, the brain has few stress-
      hormone receptors and reacts to stress like a skittish horse hearing
      a gunshot.

      But licking and grooming by an attentive mother literally removes the
      silencer; the molecule is gone. Those baby rats have lots of stress-
      hormone receptors in their brains and less stress hormone, and they
      grow up to be curious, unafraid and able to handle stress.

      "In the nature/nurture debate, people have long suspected that the
      environment somehow regulates the activity of genes," says Prof.
      Meaney. "The question has always been, how? It took four years, but
      we've now shown that maternal care alters the chemistry of the gene."

      The discovery overturns genetic dogma so thoroughly -- after all, how
      mom treats the kids isn't supposed to alter something so fundamental
      as their DNA -- that one researcher reviewing Prof. Meaney's
      manuscript at a prominent American science journal said there is no
      precedent for such a claim, asserted that he simply didn't believe
      it, and recommended that the journal not publish it. The scientists
      at Nature disagreed.

      A key unanswered question is whether DNA can change even later in
      life. That is, can rats who grow up to be skittish, because they were
      reared by standoffish mothers, mellow out as the result of some
      experience? And does parental care, or other experience, alter DNA in
      people, too?

      It would be astonishing if it did not. Altering genes by adding or
      removing silencing molecules is part of a new field called
      epigenetics. If epigenetics were a film, it would be "Fahrenheit
      9/11," the hot new release and one that is causing more than a bit of
      consternation among traditionalists. This year's Nobel Symposium in
      Stockholm featured epigenetics, as did the A-list annual conference
      of the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York. Last month, the
      National Institutes of Health announced a $5 million grant to Johns
      Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, to establish the
      Center for Epigenetics of Common Human Disease, the first of its kind.

      Genetic changes are mutations in which one or more of the four
      chemicals that make up the twisting double helix of DNA is,
      typically, deleted or changed. Instead of ATTCTG, for instance, you
      have ATTGTG; as a result, the gene no longer functions as intended.

      Epigenetic changes, in contrast, leave the sequence of As, Ts, Cs and
      Gs untouched. But the DNA acquires some new accessories, as it were:
      Certain small molecules glom onto the DNA, and suddenly a gene that
      was silent is active, or one that was active is hushed. That is what
      happened to Prof. Meaney's rats: A previously silenced gene began
      singing loud and clear.

      The appeal of epigenetics is obvious to anyone who is or knows an
      identical twin. Despite having the exact same sequence of DNA,
      identical twins aren't identical, especially when it comes to
      diseases such as cancers and mental illness. Something has altered
      their DNA sequence so that disease-causing genes turn on or disease-
      suppressing genes turn off. I'll explore epigenetics further in next
      week's column.
    • Wayne Radinsky
      Ok, first of all, the idea that experience shapes the brain is not new. I posted http://www.violence.de on this list years ago, for example. And you can go all
      Message 2 of 3 , Jul 19, 2004
      • 0 Attachment
        Ok, first of all, the idea that experience shapes the brain
        is not new. I posted http://www.violence.de on this list
        years ago, for example. And you can go all the way back to
        the Harlow monkey experiments.

        Here's a book review that popped up recently:

        Minding the baby
        When researchers studied the brains of Romanian orphans -
        children who had been left to cry in their cots from birth
        and denied any chance of forming close bonds with an adult
        - they found a "virtual black hole" where the orbitofrontal
        cortex should have been.
        http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/politicsphilosophyandsociety/0,6121,1263076,00.html

        Secondly: this writer seems confused about the meaning of
        "epigenetic". As I understood it, what "epigenetic"
        (ancient greek for "outside genetic") refers to is the
        influence of the non-DNA material in the egg when it's
        fertilized. In other words, the organism that you get is
        not *just* the result of the DNA, but the result of the DNA
        + the rest of the egg. This writer seems to have confused
        epigenic factors with gene *expression*. Genes control the
        expression of other genes, so that depending on the
        environmental circumstance, some genes may or may not be
        expressed. One way this is done is by attaching other
        molecules to the DNA (you could call them "silencers" but
        I've never heard biologists use the term) which inhibit the
        ribosomes from transcribing that section of the DNA.


        wayne

        On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:04:02 -0000, Michael Korns <mkorns@...> wrote:
        > Mellow or Stressed?
        > Mom's Care Can Alter
        > DNA of Her Offspring
        > Wall Street Journal Science Page
        > July 16, 2004
        >
        [thwack]
      • Michael Korns
        On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 Wayne Radinsky wrote Subject: Re: Mom s Care Can Alter DNA of Her Offspring Mike, I re-read the original article you
        Message 3 of 3 , Jul 23, 2004
        • 0 Attachment
          On Thu, 22 Jul 2004 Wayne Radinsky <waynerad@...> wrote
          Subject: Re: Mom's Care Can Alter DNA of Her Offspring

          Mike,

          I re-read the original article you posted. I also searched
          Google news for more articles.

          In the two articles (yours and the one I found on Google),
          I did not see any evidence that the so-called "altered" DNA
          affected the germline and was passed to offspring. I could
          not find any evidence that the "epigenetic" factors -- the
          "silencers" for "stress hormone receptor regulation" were
          transported from the brain to the egg cells where they
          could affect the offspring via epigenetic effects.

          Therefore NO Lamarckian evolution is taking place.
          Remember, to establish Lamarckian evolution, it is not
          enough to show the mother's behavior affects the brain
          development of the offspring. You must also show that those
          changes are transmitted to the offspring's offspring.

          Wayne,

          You are right about the author's use of the term "epigenetic".
          As for Lamarckian evolution taking place, we're getting closer.
          Certainly, cloning is an example of indirect Lamarckian
          evolution. The scientist's brain alters Dolly's genes and the
          changes are passed on the Dolly's children. Furthermore, as
          more experiments in somatic genetic treatments are successful,
          the barriers to true Lamarckian evolution will be further
          challenged.

          Michael

          ************************************************
          Michael Korns
          1 Plum Hollow Drive
          Henderson, Nevada 89052
          (702) 837-3498
          mkorns@...
          www.korns.comwww.InvestByAgent.com
          ************************************************


          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.