Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [bacnet-mstpwg] Possible errata from addendum 135-2004 b part 9 in MS/TP Master figure

Expand Messages
  • Dave Robin
    And I included it in the errata for 2010, so we re double covered. Dave
    Message 1 of 3 , Jun 21, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      And I included it in the errata for 2010, so we're double covered.

      Dave

      On May 15, 2012, at 10:52 AM, kerlyn2001 wrote:

      > Cliff et al.
      >
      > I added this transition in the latest draft of Add-135-2010an, which I have just uploaded.
      >
      > -K-
      >
      > --- In bacnet-mstpwg@yahoogroups.com, "cliffcopass" <Clifford.H.Copass@...> wrote:
      >>
      >> One of our people pointed out that the Idle state (clause 9.5.6.2) transition "BroadcastDataNeedingReply" added by addendum 135-2004 b part 9 was not added to the Master Node State Machine figure 9-4. Could this be considered an errata since the text clearly calls for this transition?
      >>
      >> Cliff Copass
      >> Johnson Controls, Inc.
      >>
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > ------------------------------------
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >
      >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.