I will upload the latest revision of the IPv6 proposal to the Yahoo group later today, would it be possible for those who entered public review comments for PPR1 to review this revision and provide feedback? I believe that most of the major concerns have been addressed in one form or another. There is some remaining language crafting that needs resolved, and I have also have some outstanding questions for the remaining PPR comments. I would like to setup a teleconference after next week sometime, and start having them weekly so we can go to Atlanta with something ready to vote out for PPR2.
When I send the notice for the update proposal, I will include the remaining questions about the proposal.
Add. AJ PPR2 Draft 1 has been uploaded to the IP-WG Yahoo site.
The PR comments and resolutions are listed in change tracking comments. Please review the changes and provided feedback.
Following are the outstanding comments, and the questions I have about them.
Comment 0004-008, should virtual address be replaced with VMAC globally in the BVLL descriptions?
Comment 0006-004, this is perhaps language crafting, but I'm not sure.
Comment 0007-001, how to get this language into the addenda? Investigate ULA
Comment 0007-004, does just replacing "subnet" with "link" resolve this comment/issue?
Comment 0007-005, does the updated X.4 correct this?
Comment 0007-006, not sure how to solve this for the next PPR. Could this be a "rev 2" type change???
Comment 0007-009, what can we do to solve this? Should we consider a similar solution to the BACnet device profiles introduced for BBMD/Router/GW?
Comment 0007-010, Does the new language referencing VMAC table management address this sufficiently???
- I have reviewed the revised proposal and already found some issues.
I will discuss them with Bernhard Isler/Klaus Waechter and upload it early next week.
Building Technologies Division