FOR EDIT: Field Report Bite Xtension 2 Sandals Lynne Durham
- Hi there!
Here's the text version of my Bite Xtension 2 field report. Please
ignore any odd stuff that yahoo chooses to do with the text.
The HTML version can be found at
Benton Harbor, Michigan USA
FIELD REPORT Bite Xtension 2 Sandals
Reviewed by: Lynne Durham
Review date: June 29, 2005
Name: Lynne Durham
Height: 5' 10" (1.78 m)
Weight: 153 lb (69 kg)
Email: lynnedurham AT yahoo DOT com
Location: Benton Harbor, Michigan, USA
Shoe size: Women's US 10
I am a backpacking novice - my first trip was in 2002. I have
hiked and car camped all of my life, mostly in the relative
flatlands of the lower and upper peninsulas of Michigan, but also
in areas east of the Continental Divide, such as South Dakota,
New England, Kentucky, Florida, Ohio, Indiana, and more. In
September, 2004 I did my first solo backpacking trip and in
October, 2004 I did a single-day, rim-to-rim hike of the Grand
Canyon. I keep my pack weight to 25% of bodyweight or less but
I always bring optional or comfort items.
My other outdoor experience includes trail running and
snowshoeing. I am a novice adventure racer and I have
competed in several, including both sprint- and expedition-length
Item name: Bite Xtension 2 Sandals
Manufacturer: Bite Footwear
Manufacturer's Web site: http://www.biteshoes.com/
Year of manufacture: 2005
Manufacturer claimed weight: N/A
Actual weight as received: Right: 12.1 oz (343 g) Left: 12.2 oz
g) Total: 24.3 oz (689 g), just a tad over 1.5 lbs (0.68 kg).
Available sizes (per the Web site): US Women's 5-11 (whole
and US Men's 7-16.
Manufactured in China of all man-made materials.
More extensive manufacturer's information - including fit
information - is available in my Initial Report.
During the field testing phase, these sandals have been
subjected to many miles under a variety of conditions:
- Well-maintained forest trails, both with and without socks
- Steep sand dunes, sandy beaches, and sandy trails, all
- Wet, muddy trails, without socks
- During creek/river crossings, without socks
- On asphalt roads, both with and without socks
- Indoors on both carpeted and uncarpeted surfaces, both with
and without socks
Weather conditions have ranged from pleasantly cool (50s F [10
C]) to hot (85 F [29 C]) and humid; the sandals have been worn
in both dry and rainy weather.
During this testing phase, the sandals have been used during a
wide variety of activities - some a bit odd for the shoe:
- Hiking/backpacking on trail, with and without pack. Highest
pack weight during this test period was approximately 30 lbs (14
- Bushwhacking through dense - but luckily thornless - growth
- Trail running
- Road running and walking
- Mountain biking on fire roads (with toe clips)
- Trail maintanance
- Office work
I have been drawn to running sandals for some time now. I've
always been jealous of people who can run in running shoes
sans socks and not develop blisters. Running sandals, it
seemed to me, would be the answer. The open design would
allow the toes more room to spread naturally as they do when
barefoot. The design would facilitate wonderful, cooling airflow.
However, when it comes to either running or hiking long
distances, I seem doomed to require socks. While these
sandals are incredibly comfortable for walking or running short
distances, I developed blisters anytime I went further than 3
miles (5 km) without socks.
The Bite Xtension 2's fit system is quite easy to use and to make
properly snug. However, soon after the sandals are fitted snugly,
the heel strap loosens. At first, I found this disconcerting and
kept re-tightening the strap. However, I finally decided that
perhaps they were supposed to fit that way and I left the heel
strap loose. The sandals did not flop around and the loose strap
never affected my gait. In the long run, I did not find this
loosening to be an issue.
In my initial review of the sandals, I expressed concern about
whether the arch support would be sufficient for my needs.
However, this turned out to be a nonissue. The sandals offer
plenty of support for my needs and comfortable even under my
heaviest pack weight of the test (30 lbs [14 kg]). Additionally, the
arch area was comfortable and supportive during trail and road
Wearing socks with the sandals completely eliminated the
blistering issue. However, doing so defeated the reason I
enjoyed the sandals: the airflow and the ability to spread my toes
naturally. I tried to use various taping methods while wearing the
sandals without socks, but a blister would pop up in an
During paddling use, the sandals were highly effective. The
soles are stable, even on wet surfaces. The material dries out
quickly and comfortably.
The sandals are easy to get on and off your feet quickly - a
simple squeeze of the buckle opens the ankle strap and allows
the sandals to come off. The Toe Guard offers adequate
protection from stubbed toes, however, it does not prevent trail
debris - sticks, twigs, stones - from creeping under your foot.
One of the areas where I had assumed the sandal would excel
was sand. It seemed to me that the open design would allow
sand to sift out as quickly as it sifted in. However, this did not
prove to be the case.
I used the sandals both running without pack and hiking with a
pack in sandy areas, including dunes. As expected, the sand
would quickly sift into the sandal. However, rather than sifting
right back out again, the sand would build up in the arch area. I
would stop and shake my foot (either toe down or heel down) in
an attempt to remove the sand - but to no avail. I had to remove
the sandal to get rid of the sand build up. I'm not sure if this is a
function of how high my arch is or what (however, I do not have a
particularly high arch - simply normal).
The Xtension 2's outsole offered good traction on a variety of
surfaces, ranging from a wet canoe bottom to scree-covered
trails to asphalt or concrete roads.
The open design offered tremendous comfort from a both a
temperature and a functional standpoint. The air could flow over
my feet as I moved. My toes could spread naturally and "grip"
while I moved. My feet stayed cool and comfortable and never felt
slimy or sweaty - and thus never seemed as smelly. However, I
was never able to escape the blister issue when I went without
socks. I tried taping, but I would just develop blisters in new,
Additionally, once under my foot, trail debris would not easily fall
out of the sandal. I had more trouble with small twigs, stones,
etc., than I have while wearing running shoes and short gaiters.
Even on short jaunts I inevitably get a stone between my foot and
the footbed which requires that I stop and take the sandal off to
When these sandals were worn with socks, I experienced
absolutely no blister problems, even under longer mileage (20
miles or 32 km). I did, however, still experience trail debris
FOR FURTHER TESTING
Overall, I find these sandals extremely comfortable from a
daily-wear, short mileage standpoint. It may just be that I'm one
of those people who cannot go without socks. I look forward to
the extended testing period to determine if I am able to solve this
Additionally, I'll be interested to see how these sandals hold up
over my long-term usage.
BENEFITS (so far)
- Easy to fit with the pulley system, very adjustable
- 45-day comfort guarantee
- Well cushioned, comfortable
- Stable and supportive
- Less foot sweat means less smell
LIMITATIONS (so far)
- Blister issues when worn without socks for 3 miles (5 km) or
- Trail debris and sand do not slide out of the sandal as easily
as they slide into the sandal
Thank you to Bite Footwear and BackpackGearTest for the
To evaluate these sandals.
- Please find below, my BITE Xtension 2 Running Sandals Field Report. I did
end up exchanging the size 12s for size 11s (US), however my report is
primarily written on the size 12s since I only received the replacements
day before yesterday. I think I captured everything appropriately, but
please let me know if there are any errors in my approach.
Picture/Table version available in the test folder.
Thanks in advance!
NOTE: there is a <> toward the beginning of
the report in the test folder which I have
removed, but not reuploaded.
Field Test Report:
BITE Xtension 2
by James E. Triplett
Personal Biographical Information:
Name: James E. Triplett
Height: 6' 2" (188 cm)
Weight: 190 lb (86.2 kg)
Foot size: 12 US (as measured on a Brannock device)
Email address: james_triplett@...
City, State: Cedar Rapids, Iowa - USA
Date: June 30, 2005
I was brought up exploring the woods, primarily West of the Mississippi
from Missouri to as far North as Hudson Bay, and have a heavily ingrained
appreciation for nature. In college my recreation consisted of hiking to
bouldering areas and rock climbing on the bluffs and trails in Southern
Illinois, which ultimately led to continuously hiking the lower 1/3 of the
Appalachian Trail. I hike every day, and backpack when possible. I am a
mid-weight backpacker, experienced hiker and camper, and have had some
exposure to longer hikes of 50 to 500 miles (80 to 800 km). I prefer a
tent over a tarp, in fact I love tents, but have not yet tried a hammock.
Manufacturer: BITE Footwear - Redmond, Washington
Item being tested: BITE Xtension 2 Running Sandal - Size 12 Size 11 US
Year of Manufacture: New for March 2005
Date Item Received: April 27, 2005
Model / Color: 5005c - Taupe / Natural / Yellow
MSRP: $79.99 US
Listed weight: None given
Size 12 US: Left =16.1 oz (456 g), Right =16.0 oz (454 g)
Size 11 US: Left =15.5 oz (440 g), Right =14.8 oz (420 g)
Available US sizes (whole sizes only):
Mens 7 - 16
Womens 5 - 11
5005a - Wheat / Almond
5005b - Taupe / Natural / Red
5005c - Taupe / Natural / Yellow (this test)
5005a - Wheat / Almond
5005b - Taupe / Natural / Ruby
5005c - Natural / Navy / Teal
The following information is from the biteshoes website:
BITE Xtension 2 Information:
- Xtension 2 pulley strapping system secures the foot to the midsole
- Quick-drying lightweight Durahide upper
- Dual buckle design provides a snug, adjustable fit
- Forefoot straps hold foot securely around metatarsal heads
- Burst outsole with multidirectional grip
- Thin, responsive outsole for lively ground feel
- Enerflow system transfers energy from heel to toe
- Contoured Phylon midsole cradles the foot for support
- ATS heel pad for soft impact and forefoot Pe Launch Pad for life
- Medial post featuring Grey Matter to eliminate pronation
- Motion Control Stabilizer and Spring Bar for exceptional foot control
- Arch shank gives extra support and stability
- Toe Guard protection for security
BITE's Xtension 2 Description:
Durahide Running sandal. Strengthens feet through increased muscle use.
Dual density posted midsole, extra cushioning, arch support, and exclusive
forefoot spring bar.
As mentioned in my initial report, I was a little leery of getting the
size 12 (US) sandals without trying them on. For reasons expressed below,
I have exchanged the size 12 (US) BITE Xtension 2 sandals for size 11 (US)
sandals. The overall appearance of the sandals, except for the size, is
unchanged from the original pair.
Testing The BITEs:
Size Issue and Exchange:
I started wearing the Xtension 2 Sandals immediately upon their arrival.
The fit of the lower portion of the sandals (the base to which all the
straps and "uppers" are attached) seemed reasonable, although maybe just a
tad big. The BITE literature says that "a shoe that has a more generous
fit is better than one that fits tightly", so I thought I was okay. As it
turns out, the uppers of the sandals became looser and looser, and the
tails of the two adjustment straps became quite long as I continued to
tighten the sandals over several weeks. The strap which goes through the
buckle over my ankle became long enough that I would step on it as I
hiked. This is the strap which is secured with Velcro, and with the
wide soles of the sandals, and the strap going out and over the sole, the
Velcro securing system became difficult to secure. The other strap could
be tucked into the sandal, but it was quite long too.
In addition to the uppers seeming too large for my feet, another
discouraging symptom developed with the Xtension 2 sandals. Neither of
the two buckles on each sandal would stay tight. The over the ankle strap
has a friction buckle (1st picture below) which uses Velcro on the strap
end to provide the locking after it is adjusted. As I mentioned above,
this strap would become slightly looser over short distances of hiking.
The buckles around the heals (2nd picture below) have a flip-to-lock
mechanism, yet this lock would allow the strap to slip through
significantly to the point where my feet would move around on the footbed
of the sandals. This would occur, on a good day, after a mile (1.6 km) of
hiking, and on a bad day the sandals would be loose after only 5 minutes
of hiking. The locking buckles would still be locked, but the strap would
<buckle 1 image> <buckle 2 image>
I contacted BITE about this issue, and they were most friendly with their
response. Without acknowledging any issues with the buckles slipping, or
the design of the Xtension 2 Running Sandals, I was told that it sounded
like I needed to drop down to the next smaller size sandal. Given the
limited options, this seemed like the proper choice. BITE has a 45 day
fit guarantee, and I was told that if the new size ended up being too
small then I could return them too, and go back to the larger size. I
shipped the sandals back to BITE and a seemingly long 17 days later I
received the replacements. The new sandals arrived just this week.
At this point in time, my field testing has been done primarily on the
larger (size 12 US) sandals. Despite having to continually tighten the
sandals, I believe the performance of the Xtension 2s was adequately
tested, and I am reporting on that here.
I started off by wearing the sandals around the house, to the store, and
for general non-demanding use. After only a few days I took the BITEs on
a two mile (3.2 km) day hike, with a 22 lb (10 kg) pack. The BITEs
gripped well and I had a pleasant experience. After that point I wore the
sandals on my early morning daily hikes, over pavement and on dirt trails
through the woods, every day, rain or shine. All wearing of the sandals
has been sockless. I was impressed with the effectiveness of the
toe-guard (pictured below), as it kept nearly all debris away from my
toes. I did encounter a few jabs from sticks that I inadvertently kicked
straight on, but this was the exception and generally my feet have been
safe and sound. Of course, protection from sandals is not the same as
from shoes or boots, but BITE has designed the Xtension 2 sandals to
provide reasonable protection while still offering all the plusses of
<toe guard image>
What the sandals do offer is the comfort of open-feet hiking, which I have
quickly grown to enjoy. The sandals provide open air cooling, with
minimal pressure points from the straps which obviously cover less area of
my feet than shoes. Having my feet not overheat is a true blessing. Also,
I have plowed right through big puddles and hiked in the rain, and my feet
have actually enjoyed this as well. The wet sandals cause my feet to
slosh around in them a tiny bit, but they still feel stable. The sandals
also make a sloshing sound, but nothing too serious, and... they dry off
while I'm wearing them and I don't need to worry about whether or not they
The tread on the BITE Xtension 2 sandals seems aggressive for this type of
footwear. My hikes have taken me over dry dirt trails, through mud, tall
brush, and gravel, as well as pavement. These are the same areas I have
hiked with hiking boots and trail runners, and the grip of the BITEs has
been comparable with my other footwear. Any shortcomings in stability
have come from ankle support (or the lack thereof) and a small amount of
movement of my feet within the sandals. None of this has surprised me as
it is what I expect from sandals.
The BITE Xtension 2 sandals are listed as running sandals, however I have
not run in them. I have played tennis though, with my son Drake and some
of his 11-year-old friends. This has not been serious tennis mind you,
but I have made some heroic moves in effort to retrieve some wild shots.
The BITEs have performed admirable on the tennis courts, and surprisingly
the strap loosening issues have been less problematic during this sport.
The pictures on the left (below) are from my initial report and show the
size 12 (US) sandals, while the pictures on the right are the newly
received size 11 (US) replacements. As you can hopefully see, the
difference is noticeable, but not huge. The difference in the uppers,
specifically the strap size and length, seems more significant which is
precisely what I was looking for when I requested the exchange.
<size 12 vs. 11 image>
My testing opportunities will include conditions of dirt and grass trails,
pavement, gravel, and mud and water. I will monitor the sandals for fit
and comfort, stability, wear and durability. I had the sandals pretty
dirty, and had only cleaned them by walking through water, when I
exchanged them for a smaller, cleaner, pair. I plan to investigate how
easily the sandals can be cleaned, and if any trail grime permanently
stains or discolors the fabric. Most of my sandal hiking will be in
Eastern Iowa at elevations around 860 feet (260 meters), with temperature
and precipitation conditions as shown in the table below. I will also be
spending a week in the Colorado Rocky Mountains at the end of July, and
will expose the Xtension 2s to conditions there as much as possible
without jeopardizing the success of my trip. As temperatures cool off in
the fall I will experiment with wearing socks in the sandals. Thus far
all testing has been done with bare feet.
Temp Range degrees F
Temp Range degrees C
50 to 73
10 to 23
60 to 82
16 to 28
64 to 85
18 to 29
62 to 83
17 to 28
53 to 75
12 to 24
41 to 64
5 to 18
29 to 46
-2 to 8 2.4
The BITE Xtension 2 Running Sandals are attractive and comfortable. I am
very pleased with the support they provide my feet, and how quickly I
became acclimated to wearing them. The issue of the loosening straps has
been addressed by changing to a smaller sandal size, which may or may not
prove to be an effective solution. BITE's 45 day fit guarantee and
courteous customer service speaks well for placing a high priority on
customer satisfaction. I am still enthusiastic about theses sandals and
can't wait to put many more miles on them.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Hi Lynne, here is your official edit. Actually very little to edit.
Your link in the html is also working properly. good job!
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Lynne" <lynnedurham@g...>
- Trail maintanance
Edit: first, thats how I would spell it which should be a warning:')
Word flagged it so I looked it up and sho nuff it should be
maintenance. change the a to an e
> However, this turned out to be a nonissue.Comment. word falgged nonissue. perhaps it should be hyphinated
non-issue. your call.
That all I see...everyting was well worded and an all around
interesting read. Fix the one edit, do as you see fit on the comment
and upload when you get back.
- Hi James, here is your official edit. Actuall no edtits found. Your
link is also good to go. Another very intertaining read. I thought
you handled the fit issue perfectly. I also liked your pictures of
the new and old size shoes. So when will I see you on TV playing
tennis...sounds like you are a pro:')
I see you are also going oop. if you get this in time then upload at
will...if not then as soon as you can upon your return.
--- In email@example.com, <jetriple@r...> wrote:
> Please find below, my BITE Xtension 2 Running Sandals Field Report.
- Thanks Coy!
I'm still here... and will upload the report in about an hour.
firstname.lastname@example.org wrote on 07/01/2005 10:16:08 AM:
> Hi James, here is your official edit. Actuall no edtits found. Your[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> link is also good to go. Another very intertaining read. I thought
> you handled the fit issue perfectly. I also liked your pictures of
> the new and old size shoes. So when will I see you on TV playing
> tennis...sounds like you are a pro:')
> I see you are also going oop. if you get this in time then upload at
> will...if not then as soon as you can upon your return.
> Coy Boy
- - FYI -
I was browsing the test folder and found Thomas Peltier II's report on the
Thomas - there is no "S" in Ultimate Direction. This is especially
critical in your Manufacturer URL... which takes us to an unrelated site.
Now I see that you fixed the link in the final version, but you still need
to change the name to "Ultimate Direction". I think it is only in there
about three times.
Looking at your initial report it looks like you have the same issue
there... and this one does have the bad link. Any Mod can delete these
for you if you require that service. Just holler.
BGT Edit Moderator
PS: The test folder version should be deleted as well.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
- Thank you for the edits, Coy.
I've been OOP and I haven't been able to get to the messages until
just now. The Bite report is on my computer at work, so I'll make the
edits and upload first thing tomorrow morning.
Benton Harbor, Michigan USA
On 7/1/05, Coy <starnescr@...> wrote:
> Hi Lynne, here is your official edit. Actually very little to edit.
> Your link in the html is also working properly. good job!
> --- In email@example.com, "Lynne" <lynnedurham@g...>
> - Trail maintanance
> Edit: first, thats how I would spell it which should be a warning:')
> Word flagged it so I looked it up and sho nuff it should be
> maintenance. change the a to an e
> > However, this turned out to be a nonissue.
> Comment. word falgged nonissue. perhaps it should be hyphinated
> non-issue. your call.
> That all I see...everyting was well worded and an all around
> interesting read. Fix the one edit, do as you see fit on the comment
> and upload when you get back.
> Coy Boy
> Yahoo! Groups Links
Benton Harbor, Michigan USA