Re: Elder races where are you?
> > 1. Example: Player 1declares a NightwatchBut note that the conflict card must have been chosen
> conflict from his Agenda (OOPF) ,
> > Player 2 declares no conflict, Player 3 declares a
> conflict (face down
> > card), Player 4 declares no conflict.
> > When does a) the type of conflict have to be
> declared (where there is a
> > choice, such as in OOPF) and b) the target of the
> conflict have to be
> > declared? Are these at declaration or in
> initiative order once other
> > conflicts have been revealed ?
> When a conflict is revealed, all aspects of the
> conflict (save those
> specifically mentioned to be chosen during
> resolution) are selected. Thus,
> the type & target of the OOPF is selected before
> player 3 reveals their
> conflict card.
before the exact nature of the OOPF conflict is
> > 2. Genius Loci is participating in a conflictI agree with your logic although I wonder about
> (leading Exodus). Player B
> > rotates a leader to lead a fleet which later goes
> on to participate in that
> > conflict. Does the leader then take damage, ie is
> he considered to have
> > rotated to participate in the conflict? What would
> be the case if the fleet
> > were already in the conflict and he tehn rotated
> to lead it?
> The difficulty here is the 'rotate to participate'
> term. When you rotate
> to lead a fleet, it does not directly imply that the
> leader is
> participating. I would rule that leaders do not take
> damage due to Genius Loci.
leaders being considered partisipants for the purposes
> > 3. The Aftermath 'Abandoned' is played on aPoint taken but SotM allows a discount to sponsering
> character. Does he still count
> > as 'mighty' for the agenda Support of the Mighty?
> Abandoned refers to ignoring the *effects* of
> *other* cards on the
> *target*. So you could not promote a character for
> the reduced cost from
> Support of the Mighty, but that does not change the
> fact that Support of
> the Mighty can give you +1 power if he is ready. The
> character ignores the
> effects of Support of the Mighty. Support of the
> Mighty, however, does not
> ignore the character.
mighty characters, not promoting them.
All the best,
For a better Internet experience
- ...The difficulty here is the 'rotate to participate' term. When you rotate
to lead a fleet, it does not directly imply that the leader is
participating. I would rule that leaders do not take damage due to Genius
...I agree with your logic although I wonder about leaders being considered
partisipants for the purposes of aftermaths?...
Possibly this is a question of order:
- A character that rotates to lead a ready fleet is definitely not
"rotating to participate" although he may become a participant if the fleet
- A character that rotates to lead a participant fleet probably should be
considered to be "rotating to participate" as his Action will make him a
participant in exactly the same way that "rotating to support", "rotating
to oppose" or "rotating to attack" would.