Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Messages List

145589

Re: Anyone want to learn to GM a Pacific GS game?

Criteria: Knowledge of GS, familiarity with Word and availability.
Bruce Harper
9:59 AM
#145589
 
145588

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

... ... Unleash the hordes of diplomats! Ten separate targets! Let's see you stop all of them, Axis swine! :) ... I am assuming that this is actual text in
randy_scheers
Feb 5
#145588
 
145587

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

I recommend the issue be sent to the Permanent Court of International Justice at The Hague for final settlement, instead. Send in the lawyers! -- Jeff Pierce
cliffhangersgm
Feb 5
#145587
 
145586

Re: Eastern Poland Question

I guess I will rewrite that rule, because the date is flexible. From: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com [mailto:aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Friday, February
Bruce Harper
Feb 5
#145586
 
145585

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

As Judge Advocate I rule in your favor. From: "'Bruce Harper' bruce54321@... [aworldatwar]" To: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com
Dave Hanson
Feb 5
#145585
 
145584

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

I claim he is mocking us. From: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com [mailto:aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 9:32 AM To:
Bruce Harper
Feb 5
#145584
 
145583

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

I think hockey would be a better place to look. Basically at the end of a game where a call would affect the outcome only blatent offenses would be called, but
Bill
Feb 5
#145583
 
145582

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

I would never! Eric "Innocent" Thobaben  Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone I would never! Eric "Innocent" Thobaben Sent from my Verizon Wireless
ethobaben
Feb 5
#145582
 
145581

Re: Eastern Poland Question

... - AWAW starts with Poland unconquered - there is a Nazi-Soviet Pact - central Poland is on the Germany side - eastern Ploland is on the
donmoody_prons_net
Feb 5
#145581
 
145580

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

That's a good point. Eric? From: aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com [mailto:aworldatwar@yahoogroups.com] Sent: Friday, February 5, 2016 9:05 AM To:
Bruce Harper
Feb 5
#145580
 
145579

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

taunting? pffft - you call that taunting?
donmoody_prons_net
Feb 5
#145579
 
145578

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

Well here is the absolutely clear NFL definition of taunting. It is what one would expect from an organization with as much integrity and consistency like the
Paul Milne
Feb 5
#145578
 
145577

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

You’d really have to ask the game designer who wrote the rule, but my take on it would be: 1. The rule is worded strangely – it says “taunt, abuse
Bruce Harper
Feb 5
#145577
 
145576

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

Excellent questions. FWIW as a kibitzer based on the other side of the globe from the incident complained of, I consider the "taunting" of Germany and Italy in
Dave Hanson
Feb 5
#145576
 
145575

Re: Question re GS rule 35.11

An important question came up in the final turn of the Europe-Pacific playtest game. Is this Allied diplomatic submission “improper” or “proper”
Bruce Harper
Feb 5
#145575
 
View First Topic Go to View Last Topic
Loading 1 - 15 of total 145,589 messages