Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Energizing Off-Grid Power

Expand Messages
  • Kevin Fullerton
    Energizing Off-Grid Power Blackout Raises Interest in Alternatives To Nation s Stressed Electricity System By JEFFREY BALL Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET
    Message 1 of 1 , Aug 20, 2003
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Energizing Off-Grid Power


      Blackout Raises Interest in Alternatives
      To Nation's Stressed Electricity System


      By JEFFREY BALL

      Staff Reporter of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL



      In the aftermath of last week's power outage, which shut businesses in
      the Northeast and the Midwest, an idea once viewed as radical is
      generating new buzz: What if enough U.S. buildings could generate enough
      of their own electricity to collectively ease the load on the nation's
      overstretched power grid?

      Proponents of this idea, known as "distributed generation ," have been
      advocating it for years. Peddling everything from natural-gas-powered
      engines to solar cells to "microturbines" to, more recently, fuel cells,
      these companies argue the country is kidding itself if it thinks it can
      rely exclusively on a decades-old model of electricity production --
      huge centralized power plants connected to consumers and companies by an
      aging web of transmission lines -- as the U.S. population, and the
      average American's electricity use, continues to rise.

      Many of the companies that supply the alternative gear are small and
      not-yet profitable. But major players including General Motors Corp. and
      even some traditional utilities are getting into the
      distributed-generation business. Companies including Dow Chemical Co.
      and major commercial-real-estate owners are installing
      distributed-generation systems in a bid to cut their energy costs.

      Typically, the public's interest in distributed generation -- along with
      the stock prices of small publicly traded companies in the business --
      surges every time the grid goes down, only to subside just as quickly
      when the lights come back on. That was the case with the rolling
      blackouts in California a few years ago.

      Now, in the wake of last week's more-sudden blackout, the biggest in
      U.S. history, distributed-generation backers are arguing that their time
      has come. "One couldn't ask for a more exciting marketing and
      advertising campaign than what happened in the Northeast," said John
      Tucker, chief executive of Capstone Turbine Corp., a Chatsworth, Calif.,
      manufacturer of small turbines, known as microturbines, that generate
      electricity.

      The popular image of distributed generation is of a feisty homeowner
      declaring independence from the grid by slapping solar cells on the roof
      or damming a stream to generate power. But if distributed generation is
      to perceptibly ease the load on the nation's grid, experts say, lots of
      big electricity users will have to adopt it: entire residential
      communities, big office buildings and major factories.

      Today, distributed generation accounts for a small fraction of the
      approximately 900,000 megawatts of electrical-generating capacity in the
      U.S. People disagree on the exact percentage because they disagree about
      what equipment to count. (One megawatt equals 1,000 kilowatts; the
      average house uses one to five kilowatts, depending on its size, energy
      experts say.)

      Diesel-powered generators are a widespread source of backup power in
      some houses and many large buildings and hospitals. But they require
      fuel tanks that take up valuable space and that need to be refilled.
      Installing the units in major cities is getting tougher because of
      increasingly stringent government limits on diesel emissions.

      Proponents of distributed generation have grander plans. They envision
      newer technologies that produce less in the way of smog-causing and
      global-warming emissions. They say using these clean technologies to
      generate power at the site where it is consumed can be far more
      efficient than generating it centrally. That's because sending
      electricity through transmission wires wastes energy while producing
      electricity on site allows waste heat from the process to be captured
      and used -- for instance, to heat the building -- in a process known as
      "cogeneration."

      Still, few advocates of distributed generation believe that large
      sectors of the economy will become independent of the grid. Rather, they
      hope to get a significant number of customers to produce at least some
      of their own electricity. That would reduce demand on the grid
      particularly during times of peak use, such as on hot summer afternoons
      like this past Thursday.

      Distributed generation faces big hurdles, which its backers hope the
      attention raised by last week's blackout will help them overcome. Among
      their druthers: heftier tax breaks to defray the high initial purchase
      price of the electric-generating equipment and government help to get
      established utilities to make it easier for electricity users to hook
      their generating devices to the grid.

      There's also a more fundamental challenge: convincing investors, whose
      backing the nascent distributed-generation industry needs to help
      finance its projects, that this equipment can be profitable over the
      long term. "Among the big challenges is going to be financing these
      things," said Dan Reicher, a former assistant energy secretary in charge
      of energy-efficiency programs under President Clinton and now executive
      vice president of one distributed-generation company, Waitsfield,
      Vt.-based Northern Power Systems Inc.

      Mr. Reicher has helped found a private-equity fund that hopes to raise
      $100 million to finance distributed-generation projects. So far, the
      fund has raised only about $1 million of seed money, but Mr. Reicher
      said his investors believe last week's blackout will provide a big
      boost. "A couple of them wrote to say, 'Wow! This could be a break!' "
      Mr. Reicher said.

      The idea of producing power on-site where it's needed isn't altogether
      new. Before centralized utilities with far-flung distribution lines
      sprung up early in the 20th century, some large businesses, ranging from
      railroads to steel producers, generated their own electricity at their
      own facilities. Eventually, the grid offered an economy of scale that
      was tough to beat, and most large industrial users hooked up for at
      least part of their electricity needs.

      Diesel generators -- internal-combustion engines that are hooked to
      alternators to crank out electricity -- account for the bulk of
      distributed generation in the U.S. today. Caterpillar Inc., the dominant
      player in this business, says about 8% of its $20 billion in revenue in
      2002 came from selling generators that run on either diesel or, more
      recently, cleaner-burning natural gas.

      Its generators range from home backup units that crank out about 5
      kilowatts and sell for about $10,000 to 15-megawatt units that sell for
      upwards of $1 million and can be strung together to form what's
      essentially a standalone commercial power plant. In between are
      2-megawatt Caterpillar generators -- each of which is fitted into a
      truck-trailer size shipping container -- that kept at least critical
      services running during last week's blackout in much of New York's
      financial district and at buildings across the country.

      Even before last week's blackout, some big companies already were
      showing increased interest in generating power everyday on their own.
      Equity Office Properties Trust, which owns more than 700 office
      buildings nationwide, is installing distributed-generation equipment at
      12 buildings in and around Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, San
      Diego and San Francisco, three of which involve Northern Power. The
      devices use natural gas to generate 20% to 30% of a building's power
      needs.

      Each of these systems costs $1 million to $5 million. But Equity
      believes it can recover the cost over time by reducing the amount of
      electricity it has to buy from the grid during times of peak demand, the
      hours during which office buildings are busiest and power usually costs
      the most, says Thomas W. Smith, vice president of energy operations for
      Chicago-based Equity.

      In addition, Equity plans to use the machines as marketing tools to lure
      tenants such as financial-services firms that want emergency backup
      power for their critical systems. Since last week's blackout, several
      Equity tenants have inquired about hooking up to the new
      distributed-generation units.

      Meanwhile, General Motors and Dow Chemical are involved in a
      cutting-edge project. The companies announced in May what they said is
      the biggest deal to date to install fuel cells, devices that turn
      hydrogen into electricity.

      Dow will buy GM fuel cells to use at Dow Chemical's largest factory, in
      Freeport, Texas. Each fuel cell will sit on a truck trailer and provide
      75 kilowatts of power. Dow Chemical will take hydrogen that is a
      byproduct of its chemical-production process and run it through the fuel
      cells to produce electricity to help run the plant.

      The goal over several years is for GM to provide Dow with enough fuel
      cells to generate 35 megawatts of electricity, a small fraction of the
      Texas complex's total requirement. For Dow Chemical, whose factory
      already makes some of its own electricity from natural gas, the benefit
      will be reduced electricity costs, since Dow will be making power from
      what is essentially waste hydrogen.

      For GM, the objective is to help the world's largest auto maker figure
      out how to reduce the cost of manufacturing fuel cells, which GM says it
      ultimately wants to crank out in large numbers to power automobiles.

      Even some big electric utilities are getting into distributed
      generation. Some utilities view these emerging technologies as a threat
      to their established businesses. But DTE Energy, whose territory covers
      southeastern Michigan and was darkened by the blackout, has been
      investing for eight years in on-site generating equipment ranging from
      natural-gas-powered engines to turbinesto fuel cells, said Robert
      Buckler, chief executive of DTE Energy Technologies, the DTE unit
      involved in distributed generation.

      "We decided that we thought it was going to be a big enough item that we
      were going to participate in it as opposed to fight it," he said.







      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.