Re: [atm_free] Re: Null corrector for a fast mirror
- On 5/9/2013 12:34, John wrote:
> If any one wants it this link should obtain itwithout the google stuffings it is
> Ouch - couldn't remove the google stuff. It's title is
NOTE: No off-list assistance is given without prior approval.
Please keep mailing list traffic on the list unless
private contact is specifically requested and granted.
- For a complete solution source anywhere I think the sag at h is needed which can probably be derived from that link. :-) Not sketched anything out so a pure guess. From memory Sixtests allows the mirror to source distance to be specified but that may be just to reduce errors from normal Foucault readings. I don't think it allows offsets to be specified which are another source of error apart from any aberration effects.
Where some views of aberrations go astray is that when a mask is used the aberrations of the whole mirror may not be important. Instead it's the size of the circles of confusion produced by a series of small off axis mirrors in relationship to their diffraction disc size.
I also suspect that there is another test that could be used these days but no sums done to check how large a sensor is needed for good say 1/20 wave results. Hartman, if that is how it's spelled. That one would just involve taking an exposure with the lens off a dslr, moving it a specific distance along the axis of the mirror and taking another.
--- In email@example.com, "Richard F.L.R. Snashall" <rflrs@...> wrote:
> On 5/12/2013 6:06 PM, John wrote:
> > So what is the equation for the exact slope of a conic versus height?