Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

3936Re: [Artificial Intelligence Group] Re: Mass Delusion

Expand Messages
  • James Bliss
    Nov 30, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      We site seems to be a glorified search engine, if that...

      Thomas Cowley wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      > So we seem to be sneaking up on AI. For example, take the advancements
      > in Information Retrieval or QA systems. If I ask a computer a question &
      > the computer responds correctly is that AI? Further if the information
      > process derived
      > the data by consuming unstructured data, that is the computer learned
      > to reply
      > to the question correctly, is that AI?
      >
      >
      >
      > See this web site as
      > an example of such processing http://72.85. 249.224/
      > <http://72.85.249.224/>
      >
      >
      >
      > Regards Thomas
      >
      > --- On Tue, 11/25/08, Scott <bigmagumba@yahoo. com
      > <mailto:bigmagumba%40yahoo.com>> wrote:
      > From: Scott <bigmagumba@yahoo. com <mailto:bigmagumba%40yahoo.com>>
      > Subject: Re: [Artificial Intelligence Group] Re: Mass Delusion
      > To: artificialintellige ncegroup@ yahoogroups. com
      > <mailto:artificialintelligencegroup%40yahoogroups.com>
      > Date: Tuesday, November 25, 2008, 3:38 PM
      >
      > So, as the debate progresses ... what exactly does one have?
      >
      >
      >
      > Since no one can prove or disprove that we will or we won't have "x"
      > by "y" date, I'm not sure that deeply debating the topic provides any
      > more proof of intelligence than the subject itself.
      >
      >
      >
      > Just my humble opinion.
      >
      >
      >
      > Scott
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
    • Show all 63 messages in this topic