Re: dear angle...
- Well said, Captain....
--- In armyofrobertthebruce@y..., capttankard <no_reply@y...> wrote:
> some of us have no problem with not taking the enthic back-grounds
> historical persons personally. You seem to be having some problems
> with Normans as a whole culture, i'm ammenable to discuss any
> of the Bruce with you provided we aren't having maturity
> can discuss the Normans, William
> (Duke,King,Bastard,Conquerer,or "tanners son") , even his Anglo-
> Danish rival for the throne if you want too.
> However your claim that we are involved with any National
> movements is mistaken. Some of us are sympathetic to the Scottish
> Nationalist movement do you know about it?Or are you flinging the
> term fascist about in IGNORANCE of its definition. I for one will
> admit a certain fondness for constitution monarchy and will
> the Republicans and even the Democrats when they are trying to
> real problems. Perhaps you have mistaken us for some one else, from
> the tone of your post I'm sure that is the case.
> Finally, I have some news for you,o person who doesn't wish to
> receive return mail, you unless you were spawned from unknown
> are descended from two creatures who at least once did in
> fact"frigg".I convey my sympathies to them and hope they exerience
> less dis-appointing results next time.
> regards (in moderation),