Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

dear angle...

Expand Messages
  • capttankard
    some of us have no problem with not taking the enthic back-grounds of historical persons personally. You seem to be having some problems with Normans as a
    Message 1 of 2 , May 29, 2002
    • 0 Attachment
      some of us have no problem with not taking the enthic back-grounds of
      historical persons personally. You seem to be having some problems
      with Normans as a whole culture, i'm ammenable to discuss any aspects
      of the Bruce with you provided we aren't having maturity problems.We
      can discuss the Normans, William
      (Duke,King,Bastard,Conquerer,or "tanners son") , even his Anglo-
      Danish rival for the throne if you want too.
      However your claim that we are involved with any National Socialist
      movements is mistaken. Some of us are sympathetic to the Scottish
      Nationalist movement do you know about it?Or are you flinging the
      term fascist about in IGNORANCE of its definition. I for one will
      admit a certain fondness for constitution monarchy and will tolerate
      the Republicans and even the Democrats when they are trying to solve
      real problems. Perhaps you have mistaken us for some one else, from
      the tone of your post I'm sure that is the case.
      Finally, I have some news for you,o person who doesn't wish to
      receive return mail, you unless you were spawned from unknown origins
      are descended from two creatures who at least once did in
      fact"frigg".I convey my sympathies to them and hope they exerience
      less dis-appointing results next time.
      regards (in moderation),
      Capttankard
    • morganapmadoc
      Well said, Captain.... ... of ... aspects ... problems.We ... Socialist ... tolerate ... solve ... origins
      Message 2 of 2 , Jun 4, 2002
      • 0 Attachment
        Well said, Captain....

        --- In armyofrobertthebruce@y..., capttankard <no_reply@y...> wrote:
        > some of us have no problem with not taking the enthic back-grounds
        of
        > historical persons personally. You seem to be having some problems
        > with Normans as a whole culture, i'm ammenable to discuss any
        aspects
        > of the Bruce with you provided we aren't having maturity
        problems.We
        > can discuss the Normans, William
        > (Duke,King,Bastard,Conquerer,or "tanners son") , even his Anglo-
        > Danish rival for the throne if you want too.
        > However your claim that we are involved with any National
        Socialist
        > movements is mistaken. Some of us are sympathetic to the Scottish
        > Nationalist movement do you know about it?Or are you flinging the
        > term fascist about in IGNORANCE of its definition. I for one will
        > admit a certain fondness for constitution monarchy and will
        tolerate
        > the Republicans and even the Democrats when they are trying to
        solve
        > real problems. Perhaps you have mistaken us for some one else, from
        > the tone of your post I'm sure that is the case.
        > Finally, I have some news for you,o person who doesn't wish to
        > receive return mail, you unless you were spawned from unknown
        origins
        > are descended from two creatures who at least once did in
        > fact"frigg".I convey my sympathies to them and hope they exerience
        > less dis-appointing results next time.
        > regards (in moderation),
        > Capttankard
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.