Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.
 

Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction

Expand Messages
  • Denise Bensusan
    That seems to be the problem...we cant vote for the smaller party i.e. LP as our vote is simply wasted. I m not so sure our votes are actually counted
    Message 1 of 21 , Jan 22, 2006
      That seems to be the problem...we cant vote for the smaller party i.e. LP as our vote is simply wasted.

      I'm not so sure our votes are actually counted anyway....LOL


      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Sandra Price
      To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 2:50 PM
      Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


      Do we even have an active LP organization here? I attended the LP
      Convention in Tucson in 2004 and was not impressed with the choices of
      candidates. From what I understand, the LP will not vote, even for
      themselves. To hell with that!



      Sandy Price



      -----Original Message-----
      From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
      [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
      Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:53 PM
      To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
      Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



      Heck..I think he should run for president!!! I have not seen too much that
      Ron Paul speaks about that I disagree with.
      ----- Original Message -----
      From: Derek
      To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
      Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:59 AM
      Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


      Ron Paul speaks for me as well. I was wondering, does anyone know
      who is going to run for the US House seat being vacated at the end
      of this term by Jim Kolbe in Tucson? This might be a good time for
      a Libertarian to step up and try to win this seat. Or even if we
      could get another "Ron Paul - type Republican" that would be good
      too. Anything other than another "rubber stamp" for Bush's
      shenanigans.

      Derek Williams




      --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price" <s@r...>
      wrote:
      >
      > Words of wisdom! He speaks for me!!
      >
      > Sandy Price
      >
      > -----Original Message-----
      > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
      > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
      Bensusan
      > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:18 PM
      > To: "SPEAK OUT ARIZONA"
      > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Searching for a New Direction
      >
      > Forwarded for your interest:
      >
      > Searching for a New Direction
      >
      > by Ron Paul
      > by Ron Paul
      >
      >
      >
      > Before the US House of Representatives, January 18, 2006
      >
      > The Abramoff scandal has been described as the biggest Washington
      scandal
      > ever: bigger than Watergate; bigger than Abscam; bigger than
      Koreagate;
      > bigger than the House banking scandal; bigger than Teapot Dome.
      Possibly so.
      > It's certainly serious and significant.
      >
      > It has prompted urgent proposals of suggested reforms to deal with
      the mess.
      > If only we have more rules and regulations, more reporting
      requirements, and
      > stricter enforcement of laws, the American people will be assured
      we mean
      > business. Ethics and character will return to the halls of
      Congress. It is
      > argued that new champions of reform should be elected to leadership
      > positions, to show how serious we are about dealing with the
      crisis of
      > confidence generated by the Abramoff affair. Then all will be
      well. But it's
      > not so simple. Maybe what we have seen so far is just the tip of
      the
      > iceberg, an insidious crisis staring us in the face that we refuse
      to
      > properly identify and deal with.
      >
      > It's been suggested we need to change course and correct the way
      Congress is
      > run. A good idea, but if we merely tinker with current attitudes
      about what
      > role the federal government ought to play in our lives, it won't
      do much to
      > solve the ethics crisis. True reform is impossible without
      addressing the
      > immorality of wealth redistribution. Merely electing new leaders
      and writing
      > more rules to regulate those who petition Congress will achieve
      nothing.
      >
      > Could it be that we're all looking in the wrong places for a
      solution to
      > recurring, constant, and pervasive corruption in government?
      Perhaps some of
      > us in Congress are mistaken about the true problem; perhaps others
      > deliberately distract us from exposing the truth about how
      miserably corrupt
      > the budget process in Congress is. Others simply are in a state of
      denial.
      > But the denial will come to an end as the Abramoff scandal reveals
      more and
      > more. It eventually will expose the scandal of the ages: how and
      to what
      > degree the American people have become indebted by the totally
      irresponsible
      > spending habits of the U.S. Congress - as encouraged by successive
      > administrations, condoned by our courts, and enjoyed by the
      recipients of
      > the largesse.
      >
      > This system of government is coming to an end - a fact that
      significantly
      > contributes to the growing anxiety of most Americans, especially
      those who
      > pay the bills and receive little in return from the corrupt system
      that has
      > evolved over the decades.
      >
      > Believe me, if everybody benefited equally there would be scant
      outcry over
      > a little bribery and influence peddling. As our country grows
      poorer and
      > more indebted, fewer people benefit. The beneficiaries are not the
      > hard-working, honest people who pay the taxes. The groups that
      master the
      > system of lobbying and special interest legislation are the ones
      who truly
      > benefit.
      >
      > The steady erosion of real wealth in this country, and the
      dependency on
      > government generated by welfarism and warfarism, presents itself
      as the
      > crisis of the ages. Lobbying scandals and the need for new
      leadership are
      > mere symptoms of a much, much deeper problem.
      >
      > There are quite a few reasons a relatively free country allows
      itself to
      > fall into such an ethical and financial mess.
      >
      > One major contributing factor for the past hundred years is our
      serious
      > misunderstanding of the dangers of pure democracy. The founders
      detested
      > democracy and avoided the use of the word in all the early
      documents. Today,
      > most Americans accept without question a policy of sacrificing
      life,
      > property, and dollars to force "democracy" on a country 6,000
      miles away.
      > This tells us how little opposition there is to "democracy." No one
      > questions the principle that a majority electorate should be
      allowed to rule
      > the country, dictate rights, and redistribute wealth.
      >
      > Our system of democracy has come to mean worshipping the notion
      that a
      > majority vote for the distribution of government largesse, loot
      confiscated
      > from the American people through an immoral tax system, is morally
      and
      > constitutionally acceptable. Under these circumstances it's no
      wonder a
      > system of runaway lobbying and special interests has developed.
      Add this to
      > the military industrial complex that developed over the decades
      due to a
      > foreign policy of perpetual war and foreign military intervention,
      and we
      > shouldn't wonder why there is such a powerful motivation to learn
      the tricks
      > of the lobbying trade - and why former members of Congress and
      their aides
      > become such high-priced commodities. Buying influence is much more
      lucrative
      > than working and producing for a living. The trouble is the
      process invites
      > moral corruption. The dollars involved grow larger and larger
      because of the
      > deficit financing and inflation that pure democracy always
      generates.
      >
      > Dealing with lobbying scandals while ignoring the scandal of
      > unconstitutional runaway government will solve nothing. If people
      truly
      > believe that reform is the solution, through regulating lobbyists
      and
      > increasing congressional reporting requirements, the real problem
      will be
      > ignored and never identified. This reform only makes things worse.
      >
      > Greater regulation of lobbyists is a dangerous and unnecessary
      proposition.
      > If one expects to solve a problem without correctly identifying
      its source,
      > the problem persists. The First amendment clearly
      states: "Congress shall
      > make no laws respecting.the right of the people.to petition the
      government
      > for a redress of grievances." That means NO law!
      >
      > The problem of special interest government that breeds corruption
      comes from
      > our lack of respect for the Constitution in the first place. So
      what do we
      > do? We further violate the Constitution rather than examine it for
      guidance
      > as to the proper role of the federal government. Laws addressing
      bribery,
      > theft, and fraud, already on the books, are adequate to deal with
      the
      > criminal activities associated with lobbying. New laws and
      regulations are
      > unnecessary.
      >
      > The theft that the federal government commits against its
      citizens, and the
      > power that Congress has assumed illegally, are the real crimes
      that need to
      > be dealt with. In this regard we truly do need a new direction.
      Get rid of
      > the evil tax system; the fraudulent monetary system; and the power
      of
      > government to run our lives, the economy, and the world; and the
      Abramoff
      > types would be exposed for the mere gnats they are. There would be
      a lot
      > less of them, since the incentives to buy politicians would be
      removed.
      >
      > Even under today's flawed system of democratic government, which is
      > dedicated to redistributing property by force, a lot could be
      accomplished
      > if government attracted men and women of good will and character.
      Members
      > could refuse to yield to the temptations of office, and reject the
      path to a
      > lobbying career. But it seems once government adopts the rules of
      > immorality, some of the participants in the process yield to the
      temptation
      > as well, succumbing to the belief that the new moral standards are
      > acceptable.
      >
      > Today though, any new rules designed to restrain special interest
      favoritism
      > will only push the money further under the table. Too much is at
      stake.
      > Corporations, bureaucrats, lobbyists, and politicians have grown
      accustomed
      > to the system, and have learned to work within it to survive. Only
      when the
      > trough is emptied will the country wake up. Eliminating earmarks
      in the
      > budget will not solve the problem.
      >
      > Comparing the current scandal to the "big" one, the Abramoff types
      are petty
      > thieves. The government deals in trillions of dollars; the
      Abramoffs in mere
      > tens of millions. Take a look at the undeclared war we're bogged
      down in
      > 6,000 miles from our shores. We've spent 300 billion dollars
      already, but
      > Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz argues that the war actually
      will cost
      > between one and two trillion dollars when it's all over and done
      with.
      > That's trillions, not billions. Even that figure is unpredictable,
      because
      > we may be in Iraq another year or ten - who knows? Considering the
      war had
      > nothing to do with our national security, we're talking big bucks
      being
      > wasted and lining the pockets of many well-connected American
      corporations.
      > Waste, fraud, stupidity, and no-bid contracts characterize the
      process. And
      > it's all done in the name of patriotism and national security.
      Dissenters
      > are accused of supporting the enemy. Now this is a rip-off that a
      little
      > tinkering with House rules and restraints on lobbyists won't do
      much to
      > solve.
      >
      > Think of how this undeclared war has contributed to our national
      deficit,
      > undermined military morale and preparedness, antagonized our
      allies, and
      > exposed us to an even greater threat from those who resent our
      destructive
      > occupation. Claiming we have no interests in the oil of the entire
      Middle
      > East hardly helps our credibility throughout the world.
      >
      > The system of special interest government that has evolved over
      the last
      > several decades has given us a national debt of over eight
      trillion dollars,
      > a debt that now expands by over 600 billion dollars each year. Our
      total
      > obligations are estimated between fifteen and twenty trillion
      dollars. Most
      > people realize the Social Security system, the Medicare system,
      and the new
      > prescription drug plan are unfunded. Thousands of private pension
      funds are
      > now being dumped on the U.S. government and American taxpayers. We
      are
      > borrowing over 700 billion dollars each year from foreigners to
      finance this
      > extravagance, and we now qualify as the greatest international
      debtor nation
      > in history. Excessive consumption using borrowed money is hardly
      the way to
      > secure a sound economy.
      >
      > Instead of reining in government spending, Congress remains
      oblivious to the
      > financial dangers and panders to special interests by offering no
      resistance
      > whatsoever to every request for new spending. Congress spends
      nearly 2 ½
      > trillion dollars annually in an attempt to satisfy everyone's
      demands. The
      > system has generated over 200 trillion dollars of derivatives.
      These
      > problems can't be addressed with token leadership changes and
      tinkering with
      > the budget. A new and a dramatic direction is required.
      >
      > As current policy further erodes the budget, special interests and
      members
      > of Congress become even more aggressive in their efforts to
      capture a piece
      > of the dwindling economic pie. That success is the measure of
      effectiveness
      > that guarantees a member's re-election.
      >
      > The biggest rip-off of all - the paper money system that is
      morally and
      > economically equivalent to counterfeiting - is never questioned.
      It is the
      > deceptive tool for transferring billions from the unsuspecting
      poor and
      > middle-class to the special interest rich. And in the process, the
      > deficit-propelled budget process supports the spending demands of
      all the
      > special interests - left and right, welfare and warfare - while
      delaying
      > payment to another day and sometimes even to another generation.
      >
      > The enormous sums spent each year to support the influential
      special
      > interests expand exponentially, and no one really asks how it's
      > accomplished. Raising taxes to balance the budget is out of the
      question -
      > and rightfully so. Foreigners have been generous in their
      willingness to
      > loan us most of what we need, but even that generosity is limited
      and may
      > well diminish in the future.
      >
      > But if the Federal Reserve did not pick up the slack and create
      huge amounts
      > of new credit and money out of thin air, interest rates would rise
      and call
      > a halt to the charade. The people who suffer from a depreciated
      dollar don't
      > understand why they suffer, while the people who benefit promote
      the corrupt
      > system. The wealthy clean up on Wall Street, and the
      unsophisticated buy in
      > as the market tops off. Wealth is transferred from one group to
      another, and
      > it's all related to the system that allows politicians and the
      central banks
      > to create money out of thin air. It's literally legalized
      counterfeiting.
      >
      > Is it any wonder jobs go overseas? True capital only comes from
      savings, and
      > Americans save nothing. We only borrow and consume. A
      counterfeiter has no
      > incentive to take his newly created money and build factories. The
      incentive
      > for Americans is to buy consumer goods from other countries whose
      people are
      > willing to save and invest in their factories and jobs. The only
      way we can
      > continue this charade is to borrow excess dollars back from the
      foreign
      > governments who sell us goods, and perpetuate the pretense of
      wealth that we
      > enjoy.
      >
      > The system of money contributes significantly to the problem of
      illegal
      > immigration. On the surface, immigrants escaping poverty in Mexico
      and
      > Central America come here for the economic opportunity that our
      economy
      > offers. However, the social services they receive, including
      education and
      > medical benefits - as well as the jobs they get - are dependent on
      our
      > perpetual indebtedness to foreign countries. When the burden of
      debt becomes
      > excessive, this incentive to seek prosperity here in the United
      States will
      > change.
      >
      > The prime beneficiaries of a paper money system are those who use
      the money
      > early - governments, politicians, bankers, international
      corporations, and
      > the military industrial complex. Those who suffer most are the
      ones at the
      > end of the money chain - the people forced to use depreciated
      dollars to buy
      > urgently needed goods and services to survive. And guess what? By
      then their
      > money is worth less, prices soar, and their standard of living
      goes down.
      >
      > The consequences of this system, fully in place for the past
      thirty-four
      > years, are astronomical and impossible to accurately measure.
      Industries go
      > offshore and the jobs follow. Price inflation eats away at the
      middle class,
      > and deficits soar while spending escalates rapidly as Congress
      hopes to keep
      > up with the problems it created. The remaining wealth that we
      struggle to
      > hold onto is based on debt, future tax revenues, and our ability to
      > manufacture new dollars without restraint. There's only one
      problem: it all
      > depends on trust in the dollar, especially by foreign holders and
      > purchasers. This trust will end, and signs of the beginning of the
      end are
      > already appearing.
      >
      > During this administration the dollar has suffered severely as a
      consequence
      > of the policy of inflating the currency to pay our bills. The
      dollar price
      > of gold has more than doubled ($252 to $560 per ounce, a 122 %
      increase).
      > This means the dollar has depreciated in terms of gold, the time-
      honored and
      > reliable measurement of a nation's currency, by an astounding 55%.
      The
      > long-term economic health of the nation is measured by the
      soundness of its
      > currency. Once Rome converted from a republic to an empire, she
      depreciated
      > her currency to pay the bills. This eventually led to Rome's
      downfall. That
      > is exactly what America is facing unless we change our ways.
      >
      > Now this is a real scandal worth worrying about. Since it's not
      yet on
      > Washington's radar screen, no attempt at addressing the problem is
      being
      > made. Instead, we'll be sure to make those the Constitution terms,
      > "petitioners to redress their grievances" fill out more forms.
      We'll make
      > government officials attend more ethics courses so they can learn
      how to be
      > more ethical.
      >
      > A free nation, as it moves toward authoritarianism, tolerates and
      hides a
      > lot of abuse in the system. The human impulse for wealth creation
      is hard to
      > destroy. But in the end it will happen here, if true reform of our
      economic,
      > monetary, and political system is not accomplished.
      >
      > Whether government programs are promoted for "good" causes
      (helping the
      > poor), or bad causes (permitting a military-industrial complex to
      capitalize
      > on war profits), the principles of the market are undermined.
      Eventually
      > nearly everyone becomes dependent on the system of deficits,
      borrowing,
      > printing press money, and the special interest budget process that
      > distributes loot by majority vote.
      >
      > Today, most business interests and the poor are dependent on
      government
      > handouts. Education and medical care are almost completely
      controlled and
      > regulated by an overpowering central government. We have come to
      accept our
      > role as world policemen and nation builder with little question,
      despite the
      > bad results and an inability to pay the bills.
      >
      > The question is, what will it take to bring about the changes in
      policy
      > needed to reverse this dangerous trend? The answer is: quite a
      lot. And
      > unfortunately it's not on the horizon. It probably won't come
      until there is
      > a rejection of the dollar as the safest and strongest world
      currency, and a
      > return to commodity money like gold and silver to restore
      confidence.
      >
      > The Abramoff-type scandals come and go in Washington, patched over
      with
      > grandiose schemes of reform that amount to nothing but more
      government and
      > congressional mischief. But our efforts should be directed toward
      > eliminating the greatest of all frauds - printing press money that
      creates
      > the political conditions breeding the vultures and leeches who
      feed off the
      > corrupt system.
      >
      > Counterfeiting money never creates wealth - it only steals wealth
      from the
      > unsuspecting. The Federal Reserve creation of money is exactly the
      same.
      > Increasing the dollars in circulation can only diminish the value
      of each
      > existing dollar. Only production and jobs can make a country
      wealthy in the
      > long run. Today it's obvious our country is becoming poorer and
      more uneasy
      > as our jobs and capital go overseas.
      >
      > The Abramoff scandal can serve a useful purpose if we put it in
      context of
      > the entire system that encourages corruption.
      >
      > If it's seen as an isolated case of individual corruption, and not
      an
      > expected consequence of big government run amuck, little good will
      come of
      > it. If we understand how our system of government intervenes in
      our personal
      > lives, the entire economy, and the internal affairs of nations
      around the
      > world, we can understand how it generates the conditions where
      lobbyists
      > thrive. Only then will some good come of it. Only then will we
      understand
      > that undermining the First amendment right of the people to
      petition their
      > government is hardly a solution to this much more serious and
      pervasive
      > problem.
      >
      > If we're inclined to improve conditions, we should give serious
      > consideration to the following policy reforms, reforms the
      American people
      > who cherish liberty would enthusiastically support:
      >
      > 1.. No more "No Child Left Behind" legislation;
      > 2.. No more prescription drug programs;
      > 3.. No more undeclared wars;
      > 4.. No more nation building;
      > 5.. No more acting as the world policemen;
      > 6.. No more deficits;
      > 7.. Cut spending - everywhere;
      > 8.. No more political and partisan resolutions designed to
      embarrass those
      > who may well have legitimate and honest disagreements with current
      policy;
      > 9.. No inferences that disagreeing with policy is unpatriotic or
      disloyal
      > to the country;
      > 10.. No more pretense of budget reform while ignoring off-budget
      spending
      > and the ever-growing fourteen appropriations bills;
      > 11.. Cut funding for corporate welfare, foreign aid,
      international NGOs,
      > defense contractors, the military industrial complex, and rich
      corporate
      > farmers before cutting welfare for the poor at home;
      > 12.. No more unconstitutional intrusions into the privacy of law-
      abiding
      > American citizens;
      > 13.. Reconsider the hysterical demands for security over liberty
      by
      > curtailing the ever-expanding and oppressive wars on drugs, tax
      violators,
      > and gun ownership.
      > Finally, why not try something novel, like having Congress act as
      an
      > independent and equal branch of government? Restore the principle
      of the
      > separation of powers, so that we can perform our duty to provide
      checks and
      > balances on an executive branch (and an accommodating judiciary)
      that spies
      > on Americans, glorifies the welfare state, fights undeclared wars,
      and
      > enormously increases the national debt. Congress was not meant to
      be a
      > rubber stamp. It's time for a new direction.
      >
      > January 19, 2006
      >
      > Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
      >
      > Denise
      >
      > Denise Bensusan
      > SPEAK OUT ARIZONA
      > A Not for Profit Community Active Publication
      > http://www.frontiernet.net/~denise.bensusan/
      >
      > "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the Constitution
      of the
      > United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people of the
      United
      > States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the Courts,
      not to
      > overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert
      the
      > Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln
      >
      > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Yahoo! Groups Links
      >







      Yahoo! Groups Links









      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




      _____

      YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



      * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
      <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


      * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
      <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


      * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
      <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



      _____



      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




      Yahoo! Groups Links









      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
    • Derek Williams
      I don t know what the problem with the LP is. I wrote a letter once to the national LP (the party itself), and all they did was write me back and tell me if I
      Message 2 of 21 , Jan 22, 2006
        I don't know what the problem with the LP is. I wrote a letter once
        to the national LP (the party itself), and all they did was write me
        back and tell me if I REALLY wanted to help, I should just give them
        money. Well, #1, I am in college right now, and everyone knows how
        broke college students are. I don't have any money to give right
        now. #2, IF I had money to give, I would want to have reason to
        believe that I was going to get a return on my investment. IE,
        candidates elected, or at least have some GOOD, respectable
        candidates run for office, and have someone come up with an idea of
        how to relate to the general public.

        I have many complaints about Libertarians running for office. We
        had a guy when I lived in Tampa, FL, who ran as a Libertarian for an
        office, who was a local strip bar owner and he was always in court
        fighting with the city, or the county, etc. He seemed to be on a
        one man crusade to be able to "do his thing". The problem with that
        is that he cannot relate to, nor will he get votes from, the
        Christian community or other normal, decent, family type people (the
        majority that you have to get support from). Most people see strip
        bar owners and adult book store owners as sleazy characters. I
        don't want them representing my party to the public. I cannot in
        good conscience (being a Christian) vote for a guy like that.

        Ron Paul is definitely respectable and a good guy. No wonder he
        keeps getting re-elected. I also think that Mike Badnarik will get
        elected this time in Texas. He is a respectable guy with good views
        on the issues. They have good careers away from politics and we
        need more people like these two running for office.

        I was actually disappointed in the FSP recently because they made
        such a big deal about the licensing of barbers, cosmetologists, and
        manicurists in NH. If you are unfamiliar with it, that was where
        one of the FSP members did a manucure without a license, and got
        arrested for it to get on the news. Now they have some bills
        pending to eliminate the requirements (or at least cut down on the
        training required) for barbers, cosmetologists, and manicurists.

        Ok, here is the thing: Even though I am not a big fan of state
        regulation, and barriers to entry in business, if these people
        (barbers, manucurists,etc) are not taught properly how to disinfect
        their appliances / tools, they can spread diseases to and among
        their clients. I read about singer / American Idol judge Paula
        Abdul getting a very nasty nail fungus a while back from a nail
        salon where they did not disinfect the tools. Here is a link to
        this story:

        http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=28361

        Reportedly, this infection was also spread to many other clients.

        Now, with stories like this going on, why in the world would the FSP
        pick THIS issue to fight for less regulation about? Do they think
        that the people of NH want to risk severe nail infection getting
        manucures? These bills will be squashed quickly.

        You can also get lice from non-sterile barber tools. I would not
        want to have to go through lice treatment because some unlicensed
        barber didn't sterilize his clippers. (Luckily, I cut my own hair
        with clippers at home, but most people cannot do this and have to
        trust that their barber's tools are sterile and clean.)

        So I think that this was a bad fight to pick. Better fights to pick
        would be about taxes (most people hate taxes), or the efforts of the
        FDA / Drug Companies / Codex Alimentarius commission to ban /
        overregulate dietary supplements, and some of the violations of
        privacy that are occurring as a result of the Patriot Act. I think
        there is more public support over health freedom than there is over
        any other issue. Nobody wants the government to tell them what they
        can and cannot put in their bodies.

        I recently wrote to Badnarik's campaign about this and he did not
        have health freedom in his platform, other than market reforms which
        benefit drug companies, making drugs cheaper for everyone. I wrote
        them about it (and how it should include protection for alternative
        medicine and dietary supplements and fair and accurate claims on
        such) and was invited to write a position paper on it of about 200
        words length. Now, his health care policy / position has health
        freedom in it. (I wrote the first 2 paragraphs of the statement,
        and they liked what I wrote enough to use it - the rest of it is
        theirs.)

        Ron Paul has campaigned for health freedom as well, and I think this
        contributes to his popularity. I think the public would be very
        supportive of a Gold or Silver standard also, if it were properly
        and simply explained to them so that they could understand it
        without taking too long and boring them, or confusing them. I think
        that nearly ALL senior citizens (a big voting block) would be very
        keen to adapt a Gold standard after it is explained to them that the
        reason their pension or SS money is worth less and less every year
        is because of inflation caused by printing more and more paper
        money. Newly married couples and college students should like it
        too, because it would keep them from being priced out of a house
        when they are ready to buy their first one. Christians should buy
        this as well, as paper money violates the Biblical standard of "just
        weights and measures". After all, your money is worth less and
        less, the more they print of it. Every loan they make that is not
        backed by Gold or at least deposits in the banks, is more money
        created out of thin air, which dilutes the purchasing power of every
        dollar you and I work so hard for.

        Funny how we could not imagine buying gas or vegetables without that
        state dept. of Agriculture certification that the scales or pump are
        accurate, but we allow the government to water down our money supply
        so that they can spend more and more and then just pay it back with
        inflated dollars further on down the road. If someone explained
        this to the public, they should be able to win a debate easily. Why
        do the Libertarians not articulate this clearly in debates or
        advertisements?

        By the way, I went to a couple of Libertarian meetings in Maricopa
        County. I have not been to one yet in Tucson. I found somewhere on
        the web where they meet, but just haven't made it out to a meeting
        yet.

        These are just my thoughts. What do you all think about these
        issues?

        Derek








        --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price" <s@r...>
        wrote:
        >
        > Do we even have an active LP organization here? I attended the LP
        > Convention in Tucson in 2004 and was not impressed with the
        choices of
        > candidates. From what I understand, the LP will not vote, even for
        > themselves. To hell with that!
        >
        >
        >
        > Sandy Price
        >
        >
        >
        > -----Original Message-----
        > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
        > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
        Bensusan
        > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:53 PM
        > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
        > Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction
        >
        >
        >
        > Heck..I think he should run for president!!! I have not seen too
        much that
        > Ron Paul speaks about that I disagree with.
        > ----- Original Message -----
        > From: Derek
        > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
        > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:59 AM
        > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction
        >
        >
        > Ron Paul speaks for me as well. I was wondering, does anyone
        know
        > who is going to run for the US House seat being vacated at the
        end
        > of this term by Jim Kolbe in Tucson? This might be a good time
        for
        > a Libertarian to step up and try to win this seat. Or even if
        we
        > could get another "Ron Paul - type Republican" that would be
        good
        > too. Anything other than another "rubber stamp" for Bush's
        > shenanigans.
        >
        > Derek Williams
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price"
        <s@r...>
        > wrote:
        > >
        > > Words of wisdom! He speaks for me!!
        > >
        > > Sandy Price
        > >
        > > -----Original Message-----
        > > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
        > > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
        > Bensusan
        > > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:18 PM
        > > To: "SPEAK OUT ARIZONA"
        > > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Searching for a New Direction
        > >
        > > Forwarded for your interest:
        > >
        > > Searching for a New Direction
        > >
        > > by Ron Paul
        > > by Ron Paul
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > Before the US House of Representatives, January 18, 2006
        > >
        > > The Abramoff scandal has been described as the biggest
        Washington
        > scandal
        > > ever: bigger than Watergate; bigger than Abscam; bigger than
        > Koreagate;
        > > bigger than the House banking scandal; bigger than Teapot
        Dome.
        > Possibly so.
        > > It's certainly serious and significant.
        > >
        > > It has prompted urgent proposals of suggested reforms to deal
        with
        > the mess.
        > > If only we have more rules and regulations, more reporting
        > requirements, and
        > > stricter enforcement of laws, the American people will be
        assured
        > we mean
        > > business. Ethics and character will return to the halls of
        > Congress. It is
        > > argued that new champions of reform should be elected to
        leadership
        > > positions, to show how serious we are about dealing with the
        > crisis of
        > > confidence generated by the Abramoff affair. Then all will be
        > well. But it's
        > > not so simple. Maybe what we have seen so far is just the tip
        of
        > the
        > > iceberg, an insidious crisis staring us in the face that we
        refuse
        > to
        > > properly identify and deal with.
        > >
        > > It's been suggested we need to change course and correct the
        way
        > Congress is
        > > run. A good idea, but if we merely tinker with current
        attitudes
        > about what
        > > role the federal government ought to play in our lives, it
        won't
        > do much to
        > > solve the ethics crisis. True reform is impossible without
        > addressing the
        > > immorality of wealth redistribution. Merely electing new
        leaders
        > and writing
        > > more rules to regulate those who petition Congress will
        achieve
        > nothing.
        > >
        > > Could it be that we're all looking in the wrong places for a
        > solution to
        > > recurring, constant, and pervasive corruption in government?
        > Perhaps some of
        > > us in Congress are mistaken about the true problem; perhaps
        others
        > > deliberately distract us from exposing the truth about how
        > miserably corrupt
        > > the budget process in Congress is. Others simply are in a
        state of
        > denial.
        > > But the denial will come to an end as the Abramoff scandal
        reveals
        > more and
        > > more. It eventually will expose the scandal of the ages: how
        and
        > to what
        > > degree the American people have become indebted by the totally
        > irresponsible
        > > spending habits of the U.S. Congress - as encouraged by
        successive
        > > administrations, condoned by our courts, and enjoyed by the
        > recipients of
        > > the largesse.
        > >
        > > This system of government is coming to an end - a fact that
        > significantly
        > > contributes to the growing anxiety of most Americans,
        especially
        > those who
        > > pay the bills and receive little in return from the corrupt
        system
        > that has
        > > evolved over the decades.
        > >
        > > Believe me, if everybody benefited equally there would be
        scant
        > outcry over
        > > a little bribery and influence peddling. As our country grows
        > poorer and
        > > more indebted, fewer people benefit. The beneficiaries are not
        the
        > > hard-working, honest people who pay the taxes. The groups that
        > master the
        > > system of lobbying and special interest legislation are the
        ones
        > who truly
        > > benefit.
        > >
        > > The steady erosion of real wealth in this country, and the
        > dependency on
        > > government generated by welfarism and warfarism, presents
        itself
        > as the
        > > crisis of the ages. Lobbying scandals and the need for new
        > leadership are
        > > mere symptoms of a much, much deeper problem.
        > >
        > > There are quite a few reasons a relatively free country allows
        > itself to
        > > fall into such an ethical and financial mess.
        > >
        > > One major contributing factor for the past hundred years is
        our
        > serious
        > > misunderstanding of the dangers of pure democracy. The
        founders
        > detested
        > > democracy and avoided the use of the word in all the early
        > documents. Today,
        > > most Americans accept without question a policy of sacrificing
        > life,
        > > property, and dollars to force "democracy" on a country 6,000
        > miles away.
        > > This tells us how little opposition there is to "democracy."
        No one
        > > questions the principle that a majority electorate should be
        > allowed to rule
        > > the country, dictate rights, and redistribute wealth.
        > >
        > > Our system of democracy has come to mean worshipping the
        notion
        > that a
        > > majority vote for the distribution of government largesse,
        loot
        > confiscated
        > > from the American people through an immoral tax system, is
        morally
        > and
        > > constitutionally acceptable. Under these circumstances it's no
        > wonder a
        > > system of runaway lobbying and special interests has
        developed.
        > Add this to
        > > the military industrial complex that developed over the
        decades
        > due to a
        > > foreign policy of perpetual war and foreign military
        intervention,
        > and we
        > > shouldn't wonder why there is such a powerful motivation to
        learn
        > the tricks
        > > of the lobbying trade - and why former members of Congress and
        > their aides
        > > become such high-priced commodities. Buying influence is much
        more
        > lucrative
        > > than working and producing for a living. The trouble is the
        > process invites
        > > moral corruption. The dollars involved grow larger and larger
        > because of the
        > > deficit financing and inflation that pure democracy always
        > generates.
        > >
        > > Dealing with lobbying scandals while ignoring the scandal of
        > > unconstitutional runaway government will solve nothing. If
        people
        > truly
        > > believe that reform is the solution, through regulating
        lobbyists
        > and
        > > increasing congressional reporting requirements, the real
        problem
        > will be
        > > ignored and never identified. This reform only makes things
        worse.
        > >
        > > Greater regulation of lobbyists is a dangerous and unnecessary
        > proposition.
        > > If one expects to solve a problem without correctly
        identifying
        > its source,
        > > the problem persists. The First amendment clearly
        > states: "Congress shall
        > > make no laws respecting.the right of the people.to petition
        the
        > government
        > > for a redress of grievances." That means NO law!
        > >
        > > The problem of special interest government that breeds
        corruption
        > comes from
        > > our lack of respect for the Constitution in the first place.
        So
        > what do we
        > > do? We further violate the Constitution rather than examine it
        for
        > guidance
        > > as to the proper role of the federal government. Laws
        addressing
        > bribery,
        > > theft, and fraud, already on the books, are adequate to deal
        with
        > the
        > > criminal activities associated with lobbying. New laws and
        > regulations are
        > > unnecessary.
        > >
        > > The theft that the federal government commits against its
        > citizens, and the
        > > power that Congress has assumed illegally, are the real crimes
        > that need to
        > > be dealt with. In this regard we truly do need a new
        direction.
        > Get rid of
        > > the evil tax system; the fraudulent monetary system; and the
        power
        > of
        > > government to run our lives, the economy, and the world; and
        the
        > Abramoff
        > > types would be exposed for the mere gnats they are. There
        would be
        > a lot
        > > less of them, since the incentives to buy politicians would be
        > removed.
        > >
        > > Even under today's flawed system of democratic government,
        which is
        > > dedicated to redistributing property by force, a lot could be
        > accomplished
        > > if government attracted men and women of good will and
        character.
        > Members
        > > could refuse to yield to the temptations of office, and reject
        the
        > path to a
        > > lobbying career. But it seems once government adopts the rules
        of
        > > immorality, some of the participants in the process yield to
        the
        > temptation
        > > as well, succumbing to the belief that the new moral standards
        are
        > > acceptable.
        > >
        > > Today though, any new rules designed to restrain special
        interest
        > favoritism
        > > will only push the money further under the table. Too much is
        at
        > stake.
        > > Corporations, bureaucrats, lobbyists, and politicians have
        grown
        > accustomed
        > > to the system, and have learned to work within it to survive.
        Only
        > when the
        > > trough is emptied will the country wake up. Eliminating
        earmarks
        > in the
        > > budget will not solve the problem.
        > >
        > > Comparing the current scandal to the "big" one, the Abramoff
        types
        > are petty
        > > thieves. The government deals in trillions of dollars; the
        > Abramoffs in mere
        > > tens of millions. Take a look at the undeclared war we're
        bogged
        > down in
        > > 6,000 miles from our shores. We've spent 300 billion dollars
        > already, but
        > > Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz argues that the war
        actually
        > will cost
        > > between one and two trillion dollars when it's all over and
        done
        > with.
        > > That's trillions, not billions. Even that figure is
        unpredictable,
        > because
        > > we may be in Iraq another year or ten - who knows? Considering
        the
        > war had
        > > nothing to do with our national security, we're talking big
        bucks
        > being
        > > wasted and lining the pockets of many well-connected American
        > corporations.
        > > Waste, fraud, stupidity, and no-bid contracts characterize the
        > process. And
        > > it's all done in the name of patriotism and national security.
        > Dissenters
        > > are accused of supporting the enemy. Now this is a rip-off
        that a
        > little
        > > tinkering with House rules and restraints on lobbyists won't
        do
        > much to
        > > solve.
        > >
        > > Think of how this undeclared war has contributed to our
        national
        > deficit,
        > > undermined military morale and preparedness, antagonized our
        > allies, and
        > > exposed us to an even greater threat from those who resent our
        > destructive
        > > occupation. Claiming we have no interests in the oil of the
        entire
        > Middle
        > > East hardly helps our credibility throughout the world.
        > >
        > > The system of special interest government that has evolved
        over
        > the last
        > > several decades has given us a national debt of over eight
        > trillion dollars,
        > > a debt that now expands by over 600 billion dollars each year.
        Our
        > total
        > > obligations are estimated between fifteen and twenty trillion
        > dollars. Most
        > > people realize the Social Security system, the Medicare
        system,
        > and the new
        > > prescription drug plan are unfunded. Thousands of private
        pension
        > funds are
        > > now being dumped on the U.S. government and American
        taxpayers. We
        > are
        > > borrowing over 700 billion dollars each year from foreigners
        to
        > finance this
        > > extravagance, and we now qualify as the greatest international
        > debtor nation
        > > in history. Excessive consumption using borrowed money is
        hardly
        > the way to
        > > secure a sound economy.
        > >
        > > Instead of reining in government spending, Congress remains
        > oblivious to the
        > > financial dangers and panders to special interests by offering
        no
        > resistance
        > > whatsoever to every request for new spending. Congress spends
        > nearly 2 ½
        > > trillion dollars annually in an attempt to satisfy everyone's
        > demands. The
        > > system has generated over 200 trillion dollars of derivatives.
        > These
        > > problems can't be addressed with token leadership changes and
        > tinkering with
        > > the budget. A new and a dramatic direction is required.
        > >
        > > As current policy further erodes the budget, special interests
        and
        > members
        > > of Congress become even more aggressive in their efforts to
        > capture a piece
        > > of the dwindling economic pie. That success is the measure of
        > effectiveness
        > > that guarantees a member's re-election.
        > >
        > > The biggest rip-off of all - the paper money system that is
        > morally and
        > > economically equivalent to counterfeiting - is never
        questioned.
        > It is the
        > > deceptive tool for transferring billions from the unsuspecting
        > poor and
        > > middle-class to the special interest rich. And in the process,
        the
        > > deficit-propelled budget process supports the spending demands
        of
        > all the
        > > special interests - left and right, welfare and warfare -
        while
        > delaying
        > > payment to another day and sometimes even to another
        generation.
        > >
        > > The enormous sums spent each year to support the influential
        > special
        > > interests expand exponentially, and no one really asks how it's
        > > accomplished. Raising taxes to balance the budget is out of
        the
        > question -
        > > and rightfully so. Foreigners have been generous in their
        > willingness to
        > > loan us most of what we need, but even that generosity is
        limited
        > and may
        > > well diminish in the future.
        > >
        > > But if the Federal Reserve did not pick up the slack and
        create
        > huge amounts
        > > of new credit and money out of thin air, interest rates would
        rise
        > and call
        > > a halt to the charade. The people who suffer from a
        depreciated
        > dollar don't
        > > understand why they suffer, while the people who benefit
        promote
        > the corrupt
        > > system. The wealthy clean up on Wall Street, and the
        > unsophisticated buy in
        > > as the market tops off. Wealth is transferred from one group
        to
        > another, and
        > > it's all related to the system that allows politicians and the
        > central banks
        > > to create money out of thin air. It's literally legalized
        > counterfeiting.
        > >
        > > Is it any wonder jobs go overseas? True capital only comes
        from
        > savings, and
        > > Americans save nothing. We only borrow and consume. A
        > counterfeiter has no
        > > incentive to take his newly created money and build factories.
        The
        > incentive
        > > for Americans is to buy consumer goods from other countries
        whose
        > people are
        > > willing to save and invest in their factories and jobs. The
        only
        > way we can
        > > continue this charade is to borrow excess dollars back from
        the
        > foreign
        > > governments who sell us goods, and perpetuate the pretense of
        > wealth that we
        > > enjoy.
        > >
        > > The system of money contributes significantly to the problem
        of
        > illegal
        > > immigration. On the surface, immigrants escaping poverty in
        Mexico
        > and
        > > Central America come here for the economic opportunity that
        our
        > economy
        > > offers. However, the social services they receive, including
        > education and
        > > medical benefits - as well as the jobs they get - are
        dependent on
        > our
        > > perpetual indebtedness to foreign countries. When the burden
        of
        > debt becomes
        > > excessive, this incentive to seek prosperity here in the
        United
        > States will
        > > change.
        > >
        > > The prime beneficiaries of a paper money system are those who
        use
        > the money
        > > early - governments, politicians, bankers, international
        > corporations, and
        > > the military industrial complex. Those who suffer most are the
        > ones at the
        > > end of the money chain - the people forced to use depreciated
        > dollars to buy
        > > urgently needed goods and services to survive. And guess what?
        By
        > then their
        > > money is worth less, prices soar, and their standard of living
        > goes down.
        > >
        > > The consequences of this system, fully in place for the past
        > thirty-four
        > > years, are astronomical and impossible to accurately measure.
        > Industries go
        > > offshore and the jobs follow. Price inflation eats away at the
        > middle class,
        > > and deficits soar while spending escalates rapidly as Congress
        > hopes to keep
        > > up with the problems it created. The remaining wealth that we
        > struggle to
        > > hold onto is based on debt, future tax revenues, and our
        ability to
        > > manufacture new dollars without restraint. There's only one
        > problem: it all
        > > depends on trust in the dollar, especially by foreign holders
        and
        > > purchasers. This trust will end, and signs of the beginning of
        the
        > end are
        > > already appearing.
        > >
        > > During this administration the dollar has suffered severely as
        a
        > consequence
        > > of the policy of inflating the currency to pay our bills. The
        > dollar price
        > > of gold has more than doubled ($252 to $560 per ounce, a 122 %
        > increase).
        > > This means the dollar has depreciated in terms of gold, the
        time-
        > honored and
        > > reliable measurement of a nation's currency, by an astounding
        55%.
        > The
        > > long-term economic health of the nation is measured by the
        > soundness of its
        > > currency. Once Rome converted from a republic to an empire,
        she
        > depreciated
        > > her currency to pay the bills. This eventually led to Rome's
        > downfall. That
        > > is exactly what America is facing unless we change our ways.
        > >
        > > Now this is a real scandal worth worrying about. Since it's
        not
        > yet on
        > > Washington's radar screen, no attempt at addressing the
        problem is
        > being
        > > made. Instead, we'll be sure to make those the Constitution
        terms,
        > > "petitioners to redress their grievances" fill out more forms.
        > We'll make
        > > government officials attend more ethics courses so they can
        learn
        > how to be
        > > more ethical.
        > >
        > > A free nation, as it moves toward authoritarianism, tolerates
        and
        > hides a
        > > lot of abuse in the system. The human impulse for wealth
        creation
        > is hard to
        > > destroy. But in the end it will happen here, if true reform of
        our
        > economic,
        > > monetary, and political system is not accomplished.
        > >
        > > Whether government programs are promoted for "good" causes
        > (helping the
        > > poor), or bad causes (permitting a military-industrial complex
        to
        > capitalize
        > > on war profits), the principles of the market are undermined.
        > Eventually
        > > nearly everyone becomes dependent on the system of deficits,
        > borrowing,
        > > printing press money, and the special interest budget process
        that
        > > distributes loot by majority vote.
        > >
        > > Today, most business interests and the poor are dependent on
        > government
        > > handouts. Education and medical care are almost completely
        > controlled and
        > > regulated by an overpowering central government. We have come
        to
        > accept our
        > > role as world policemen and nation builder with little
        question,
        > despite the
        > > bad results and an inability to pay the bills.
        > >
        > > The question is, what will it take to bring about the changes
        in
        > policy
        > > needed to reverse this dangerous trend? The answer is: quite a
        > lot. And
        > > unfortunately it's not on the horizon. It probably won't come
        > until there is
        > > a rejection of the dollar as the safest and strongest world
        > currency, and a
        > > return to commodity money like gold and silver to restore
        > confidence.
        > >
        > > The Abramoff-type scandals come and go in Washington, patched
        over
        > with
        > > grandiose schemes of reform that amount to nothing but more
        > government and
        > > congressional mischief. But our efforts should be directed
        toward
        > > eliminating the greatest of all frauds - printing press money
        that
        > creates
        > > the political conditions breeding the vultures and leeches who
        > feed off the
        > > corrupt system.
        > >
        > > Counterfeiting money never creates wealth - it only steals
        wealth
        > from the
        > > unsuspecting. The Federal Reserve creation of money is exactly
        the
        > same.
        > > Increasing the dollars in circulation can only diminish the
        value
        > of each
        > > existing dollar. Only production and jobs can make a country
        > wealthy in the
        > > long run. Today it's obvious our country is becoming poorer
        and
        > more uneasy
        > > as our jobs and capital go overseas.
        > >
        > > The Abramoff scandal can serve a useful purpose if we put it
        in
        > context of
        > > the entire system that encourages corruption.
        > >
        > > If it's seen as an isolated case of individual corruption, and
        not
        > an
        > > expected consequence of big government run amuck, little good
        will
        > come of
        > > it. If we understand how our system of government intervenes
        in
        > our personal
        > > lives, the entire economy, and the internal affairs of nations
        > around the
        > > world, we can understand how it generates the conditions where
        > lobbyists
        > > thrive. Only then will some good come of it. Only then will we
        > understand
        > > that undermining the First amendment right of the people to
        > petition their
        > > government is hardly a solution to this much more serious and
        > pervasive
        > > problem.
        > >
        > > If we're inclined to improve conditions, we should give serious
        > > consideration to the following policy reforms, reforms the
        > American people
        > > who cherish liberty would enthusiastically support:
        > >
        > > 1.. No more "No Child Left Behind" legislation;
        > > 2.. No more prescription drug programs;
        > > 3.. No more undeclared wars;
        > > 4.. No more nation building;
        > > 5.. No more acting as the world policemen;
        > > 6.. No more deficits;
        > > 7.. Cut spending - everywhere;
        > > 8.. No more political and partisan resolutions designed to
        > embarrass those
        > > who may well have legitimate and honest disagreements with
        current
        > policy;
        > > 9.. No inferences that disagreeing with policy is
        unpatriotic or
        > disloyal
        > > to the country;
        > > 10.. No more pretense of budget reform while ignoring off-
        budget
        > spending
        > > and the ever-growing fourteen appropriations bills;
        > > 11.. Cut funding for corporate welfare, foreign aid,
        > international NGOs,
        > > defense contractors, the military industrial complex, and rich
        > corporate
        > > farmers before cutting welfare for the poor at home;
        > > 12.. No more unconstitutional intrusions into the privacy of
        law-
        > abiding
        > > American citizens;
        > > 13.. Reconsider the hysterical demands for security over
        liberty
        > by
        > > curtailing the ever-expanding and oppressive wars on drugs,
        tax
        > violators,
        > > and gun ownership.
        > > Finally, why not try something novel, like having Congress act
        as
        > an
        > > independent and equal branch of government? Restore the
        principle
        > of the
        > > separation of powers, so that we can perform our duty to
        provide
        > checks and
        > > balances on an executive branch (and an accommodating
        judiciary)
        > that spies
        > > on Americans, glorifies the welfare state, fights undeclared
        wars,
        > and
        > > enormously increases the national debt. Congress was not meant
        to
        > be a
        > > rubber stamp. It's time for a new direction.
        > >
        > > January 19, 2006
        > >
        > > Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
        > >
        > > Denise
        > >
        > > Denise Bensusan
        > > SPEAK OUT ARIZONA
        > > A Not for Profit Community Active Publication
        > > http://www.frontiernet.net/~denise.bensusan/
        > >
        > > "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the
        Constitution
        > of the
        > > United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people of
        the
        > United
        > > States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the
        Courts,
        > not to
        > > overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who
        pervert
        > the
        > > Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln
        > >
        > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > >
        > > Yahoo! Groups Links
        > >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > Yahoo! Groups Links
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        >
        >
        >
        >
        > _____
        >
        > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
        >
        >
        >
        > * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
        > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.
        >
        >
        > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
        > arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
        > <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
        subject=Unsubscribe>
        >
        >
        > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
        > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
        >
        >
        >
        > _____
        >
        >
        >
        > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        >
      • Sandra Price
        Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the many issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement. Their
        Message 3 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
          Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the many
          issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement. Their
          candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression they want the
          government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael Badnarik on
          several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
          Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be interpreted and
          amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group of men who
          believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a part of the
          laws of America for many years under the authority of the House and Senate.




          The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done through the
          Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be dealing with
          many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to be declared
          criminals.



          I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the accepted rules
          of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on removing
          every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up under the Bush
          Administration and have shown themselves incapable of determining what is
          legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be designed and run
          by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control over our
          lives and will eliminate our state rights.



          I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over the authority
          of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S. Constitution. I do not
          want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate of
          Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American family has
          the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this choice taken
          away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a choice for the
          mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.

          HHHH



          There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways of changing
          what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find wrong and will
          end up supporting chaos.



          Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our elections
          in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have fallen overboard
          in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through the crap the
          current parties are selling at this time.



          I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they too are
          floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but not the way
          they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.



          Sandy Pricee has



          _____



          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
        • Denise Bensusan
          Derek, Excellent insight on all counts. Especially your statement: Funny how we could not imagine buying gas or vegetables without that state dept. of
          Message 4 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
            Derek,

            Excellent insight on all counts.

            Especially your statement: Funny how we could not imagine buying gas or vegetables without that
            state dept. of Agriculture certification that the scales or pump are
            accurate, but we allow the government to water down our money supply
            so that they can spend more and more and then just pay it back with
            inflated dollars further on down the road. If someone explained
            this to the public, they should be able to win a debate easily. Why
            do the Libertarians not articulate this clearly in debates or
            advertisements?

            I'm in Kingman and the Republicans run this county!!!!! Heck they run this state in my opinion. This NOT crossing party lines when making any and all decisions has gotten so ridiculous that this government has lost all legitimacy!!



            Denise
            ----- Original Message -----
            From: Derek Williams
            To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
            Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:50 PM
            Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


            I don't know what the problem with the LP is. I wrote a letter once
            to the national LP (the party itself), and all they did was write me
            back and tell me if I REALLY wanted to help, I should just give them
            money. Well, #1, I am in college right now, and everyone knows how
            broke college students are. I don't have any money to give right
            now. #2, IF I had money to give, I would want to have reason to
            believe that I was going to get a return on my investment. IE,
            candidates elected, or at least have some GOOD, respectable
            candidates run for office, and have someone come up with an idea of
            how to relate to the general public.

            I have many complaints about Libertarians running for office. We
            had a guy when I lived in Tampa, FL, who ran as a Libertarian for an
            office, who was a local strip bar owner and he was always in court
            fighting with the city, or the county, etc. He seemed to be on a
            one man crusade to be able to "do his thing". The problem with that
            is that he cannot relate to, nor will he get votes from, the
            Christian community or other normal, decent, family type people (the
            majority that you have to get support from). Most people see strip
            bar owners and adult book store owners as sleazy characters. I
            don't want them representing my party to the public. I cannot in
            good conscience (being a Christian) vote for a guy like that.

            Ron Paul is definitely respectable and a good guy. No wonder he
            keeps getting re-elected. I also think that Mike Badnarik will get
            elected this time in Texas. He is a respectable guy with good views
            on the issues. They have good careers away from politics and we
            need more people like these two running for office.

            I was actually disappointed in the FSP recently because they made
            such a big deal about the licensing of barbers, cosmetologists, and
            manicurists in NH. If you are unfamiliar with it, that was where
            one of the FSP members did a manucure without a license, and got
            arrested for it to get on the news. Now they have some bills
            pending to eliminate the requirements (or at least cut down on the
            training required) for barbers, cosmetologists, and manicurists.

            Ok, here is the thing: Even though I am not a big fan of state
            regulation, and barriers to entry in business, if these people
            (barbers, manucurists,etc) are not taught properly how to disinfect
            their appliances / tools, they can spread diseases to and among
            their clients. I read about singer / American Idol judge Paula
            Abdul getting a very nasty nail fungus a while back from a nail
            salon where they did not disinfect the tools. Here is a link to
            this story:

            http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=28361

            Reportedly, this infection was also spread to many other clients.

            Now, with stories like this going on, why in the world would the FSP
            pick THIS issue to fight for less regulation about? Do they think
            that the people of NH want to risk severe nail infection getting
            manucures? These bills will be squashed quickly.

            You can also get lice from non-sterile barber tools. I would not
            want to have to go through lice treatment because some unlicensed
            barber didn't sterilize his clippers. (Luckily, I cut my own hair
            with clippers at home, but most people cannot do this and have to
            trust that their barber's tools are sterile and clean.)

            So I think that this was a bad fight to pick. Better fights to pick
            would be about taxes (most people hate taxes), or the efforts of the
            FDA / Drug Companies / Codex Alimentarius commission to ban /
            overregulate dietary supplements, and some of the violations of
            privacy that are occurring as a result of the Patriot Act. I think
            there is more public support over health freedom than there is over
            any other issue. Nobody wants the government to tell them what they
            can and cannot put in their bodies.

            I recently wrote to Badnarik's campaign about this and he did not
            have health freedom in his platform, other than market reforms which
            benefit drug companies, making drugs cheaper for everyone. I wrote
            them about it (and how it should include protection for alternative
            medicine and dietary supplements and fair and accurate claims on
            such) and was invited to write a position paper on it of about 200
            words length. Now, his health care policy / position has health
            freedom in it. (I wrote the first 2 paragraphs of the statement,
            and they liked what I wrote enough to use it - the rest of it is
            theirs.)

            Ron Paul has campaigned for health freedom as well, and I think this
            contributes to his popularity. I think the public would be very
            supportive of a Gold or Silver standard also, if it were properly
            and simply explained to them so that they could understand it
            without taking too long and boring them, or confusing them. I think
            that nearly ALL senior citizens (a big voting block) would be very
            keen to adapt a Gold standard after it is explained to them that the
            reason their pension or SS money is worth less and less every year
            is because of inflation caused by printing more and more paper
            money. Newly married couples and college students should like it
            too, because it would keep them from being priced out of a house
            when they are ready to buy their first one. Christians should buy
            this as well, as paper money violates the Biblical standard of "just
            weights and measures". After all, your money is worth less and
            less, the more they print of it. Every loan they make that is not
            backed by Gold or at least deposits in the banks, is more money
            created out of thin air, which dilutes the purchasing power of every
            dollar you and I work so hard for.

            Funny how we could not imagine buying gas or vegetables without that
            state dept. of Agriculture certification that the scales or pump are
            accurate, but we allow the government to water down our money supply
            so that they can spend more and more and then just pay it back with
            inflated dollars further on down the road. If someone explained
            this to the public, they should be able to win a debate easily. Why
            do the Libertarians not articulate this clearly in debates or
            advertisements?

            By the way, I went to a couple of Libertarian meetings in Maricopa
            County. I have not been to one yet in Tucson. I found somewhere on
            the web where they meet, but just haven't made it out to a meeting
            yet.

            These are just my thoughts. What do you all think about these
            issues?

            Derek








            --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price" <s@r...>
            wrote:
            >
            > Do we even have an active LP organization here? I attended the LP
            > Convention in Tucson in 2004 and was not impressed with the
            choices of
            > candidates. From what I understand, the LP will not vote, even for
            > themselves. To hell with that!
            >
            >
            >
            > Sandy Price
            >
            >
            >
            > -----Original Message-----
            > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
            > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
            Bensusan
            > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:53 PM
            > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
            > Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction
            >
            >
            >
            > Heck..I think he should run for president!!! I have not seen too
            much that
            > Ron Paul speaks about that I disagree with.
            > ----- Original Message -----
            > From: Derek
            > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
            > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:59 AM
            > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction
            >
            >
            > Ron Paul speaks for me as well. I was wondering, does anyone
            know
            > who is going to run for the US House seat being vacated at the
            end
            > of this term by Jim Kolbe in Tucson? This might be a good time
            for
            > a Libertarian to step up and try to win this seat. Or even if
            we
            > could get another "Ron Paul - type Republican" that would be
            good
            > too. Anything other than another "rubber stamp" for Bush's
            > shenanigans.
            >
            > Derek Williams
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price"
            <s@r...>
            > wrote:
            > >
            > > Words of wisdom! He speaks for me!!
            > >
            > > Sandy Price
            > >
            > > -----Original Message-----
            > > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
            > > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
            > Bensusan
            > > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:18 PM
            > > To: "SPEAK OUT ARIZONA"
            > > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Searching for a New Direction
            > >
            > > Forwarded for your interest:
            > >
            > > Searching for a New Direction
            > >
            > > by Ron Paul
            > > by Ron Paul
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > Before the US House of Representatives, January 18, 2006
            > >
            > > The Abramoff scandal has been described as the biggest
            Washington
            > scandal
            > > ever: bigger than Watergate; bigger than Abscam; bigger than
            > Koreagate;
            > > bigger than the House banking scandal; bigger than Teapot
            Dome.
            > Possibly so.
            > > It's certainly serious and significant.
            > >
            > > It has prompted urgent proposals of suggested reforms to deal
            with
            > the mess.
            > > If only we have more rules and regulations, more reporting
            > requirements, and
            > > stricter enforcement of laws, the American people will be
            assured
            > we mean
            > > business. Ethics and character will return to the halls of
            > Congress. It is
            > > argued that new champions of reform should be elected to
            leadership
            > > positions, to show how serious we are about dealing with the
            > crisis of
            > > confidence generated by the Abramoff affair. Then all will be
            > well. But it's
            > > not so simple. Maybe what we have seen so far is just the tip
            of
            > the
            > > iceberg, an insidious crisis staring us in the face that we
            refuse
            > to
            > > properly identify and deal with.
            > >
            > > It's been suggested we need to change course and correct the
            way
            > Congress is
            > > run. A good idea, but if we merely tinker with current
            attitudes
            > about what
            > > role the federal government ought to play in our lives, it
            won't
            > do much to
            > > solve the ethics crisis. True reform is impossible without
            > addressing the
            > > immorality of wealth redistribution. Merely electing new
            leaders
            > and writing
            > > more rules to regulate those who petition Congress will
            achieve
            > nothing.
            > >
            > > Could it be that we're all looking in the wrong places for a
            > solution to
            > > recurring, constant, and pervasive corruption in government?
            > Perhaps some of
            > > us in Congress are mistaken about the true problem; perhaps
            others
            > > deliberately distract us from exposing the truth about how
            > miserably corrupt
            > > the budget process in Congress is. Others simply are in a
            state of
            > denial.
            > > But the denial will come to an end as the Abramoff scandal
            reveals
            > more and
            > > more. It eventually will expose the scandal of the ages: how
            and
            > to what
            > > degree the American people have become indebted by the totally
            > irresponsible
            > > spending habits of the U.S. Congress - as encouraged by
            successive
            > > administrations, condoned by our courts, and enjoyed by the
            > recipients of
            > > the largesse.
            > >
            > > This system of government is coming to an end - a fact that
            > significantly
            > > contributes to the growing anxiety of most Americans,
            especially
            > those who
            > > pay the bills and receive little in return from the corrupt
            system
            > that has
            > > evolved over the decades.
            > >
            > > Believe me, if everybody benefited equally there would be
            scant
            > outcry over
            > > a little bribery and influence peddling. As our country grows
            > poorer and
            > > more indebted, fewer people benefit. The beneficiaries are not
            the
            > > hard-working, honest people who pay the taxes. The groups that
            > master the
            > > system of lobbying and special interest legislation are the
            ones
            > who truly
            > > benefit.
            > >
            > > The steady erosion of real wealth in this country, and the
            > dependency on
            > > government generated by welfarism and warfarism, presents
            itself
            > as the
            > > crisis of the ages. Lobbying scandals and the need for new
            > leadership are
            > > mere symptoms of a much, much deeper problem.
            > >
            > > There are quite a few reasons a relatively free country allows
            > itself to
            > > fall into such an ethical and financial mess.
            > >
            > > One major contributing factor for the past hundred years is
            our
            > serious
            > > misunderstanding of the dangers of pure democracy. The
            founders
            > detested
            > > democracy and avoided the use of the word in all the early
            > documents. Today,
            > > most Americans accept without question a policy of sacrificing
            > life,
            > > property, and dollars to force "democracy" on a country 6,000
            > miles away.
            > > This tells us how little opposition there is to "democracy."
            No one
            > > questions the principle that a majority electorate should be
            > allowed to rule
            > > the country, dictate rights, and redistribute wealth.
            > >
            > > Our system of democracy has come to mean worshipping the
            notion
            > that a
            > > majority vote for the distribution of government largesse,
            loot
            > confiscated
            > > from the American people through an immoral tax system, is
            morally
            > and
            > > constitutionally acceptable. Under these circumstances it's no
            > wonder a
            > > system of runaway lobbying and special interests has
            developed.
            > Add this to
            > > the military industrial complex that developed over the
            decades
            > due to a
            > > foreign policy of perpetual war and foreign military
            intervention,
            > and we
            > > shouldn't wonder why there is such a powerful motivation to
            learn
            > the tricks
            > > of the lobbying trade - and why former members of Congress and
            > their aides
            > > become such high-priced commodities. Buying influence is much
            more
            > lucrative
            > > than working and producing for a living. The trouble is the
            > process invites
            > > moral corruption. The dollars involved grow larger and larger
            > because of the
            > > deficit financing and inflation that pure democracy always
            > generates.
            > >
            > > Dealing with lobbying scandals while ignoring the scandal of
            > > unconstitutional runaway government will solve nothing. If
            people
            > truly
            > > believe that reform is the solution, through regulating
            lobbyists
            > and
            > > increasing congressional reporting requirements, the real
            problem
            > will be
            > > ignored and never identified. This reform only makes things
            worse.
            > >
            > > Greater regulation of lobbyists is a dangerous and unnecessary
            > proposition.
            > > If one expects to solve a problem without correctly
            identifying
            > its source,
            > > the problem persists. The First amendment clearly
            > states: "Congress shall
            > > make no laws respecting.the right of the people.to petition
            the
            > government
            > > for a redress of grievances." That means NO law!
            > >
            > > The problem of special interest government that breeds
            corruption
            > comes from
            > > our lack of respect for the Constitution in the first place.
            So
            > what do we
            > > do? We further violate the Constitution rather than examine it
            for
            > guidance
            > > as to the proper role of the federal government. Laws
            addressing
            > bribery,
            > > theft, and fraud, already on the books, are adequate to deal
            with
            > the
            > > criminal activities associated with lobbying. New laws and
            > regulations are
            > > unnecessary.
            > >
            > > The theft that the federal government commits against its
            > citizens, and the
            > > power that Congress has assumed illegally, are the real crimes
            > that need to
            > > be dealt with. In this regard we truly do need a new
            direction.
            > Get rid of
            > > the evil tax system; the fraudulent monetary system; and the
            power
            > of
            > > government to run our lives, the economy, and the world; and
            the
            > Abramoff
            > > types would be exposed for the mere gnats they are. There
            would be
            > a lot
            > > less of them, since the incentives to buy politicians would be
            > removed.
            > >
            > > Even under today's flawed system of democratic government,
            which is
            > > dedicated to redistributing property by force, a lot could be
            > accomplished
            > > if government attracted men and women of good will and
            character.
            > Members
            > > could refuse to yield to the temptations of office, and reject
            the
            > path to a
            > > lobbying career. But it seems once government adopts the rules
            of
            > > immorality, some of the participants in the process yield to
            the
            > temptation
            > > as well, succumbing to the belief that the new moral standards
            are
            > > acceptable.
            > >
            > > Today though, any new rules designed to restrain special
            interest
            > favoritism
            > > will only push the money further under the table. Too much is
            at
            > stake.
            > > Corporations, bureaucrats, lobbyists, and politicians have
            grown
            > accustomed
            > > to the system, and have learned to work within it to survive.
            Only
            > when the
            > > trough is emptied will the country wake up. Eliminating
            earmarks
            > in the
            > > budget will not solve the problem.
            > >
            > > Comparing the current scandal to the "big" one, the Abramoff
            types
            > are petty
            > > thieves. The government deals in trillions of dollars; the
            > Abramoffs in mere
            > > tens of millions. Take a look at the undeclared war we're
            bogged
            > down in
            > > 6,000 miles from our shores. We've spent 300 billion dollars
            > already, but
            > > Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz argues that the war
            actually
            > will cost
            > > between one and two trillion dollars when it's all over and
            done
            > with.
            > > That's trillions, not billions. Even that figure is
            unpredictable,
            > because
            > > we may be in Iraq another year or ten - who knows? Considering
            the
            > war had
            > > nothing to do with our national security, we're talking big
            bucks
            > being
            > > wasted and lining the pockets of many well-connected American
            > corporations.
            > > Waste, fraud, stupidity, and no-bid contracts characterize the
            > process. And
            > > it's all done in the name of patriotism and national security.
            > Dissenters
            > > are accused of supporting the enemy. Now this is a rip-off
            that a
            > little
            > > tinkering with House rules and restraints on lobbyists won't
            do
            > much to
            > > solve.
            > >
            > > Think of how this undeclared war has contributed to our
            national
            > deficit,
            > > undermined military morale and preparedness, antagonized our
            > allies, and
            > > exposed us to an even greater threat from those who resent our
            > destructive
            > > occupation. Claiming we have no interests in the oil of the
            entire
            > Middle
            > > East hardly helps our credibility throughout the world.
            > >
            > > The system of special interest government that has evolved
            over
            > the last
            > > several decades has given us a national debt of over eight
            > trillion dollars,
            > > a debt that now expands by over 600 billion dollars each year.
            Our
            > total
            > > obligations are estimated between fifteen and twenty trillion
            > dollars. Most
            > > people realize the Social Security system, the Medicare
            system,
            > and the new
            > > prescription drug plan are unfunded. Thousands of private
            pension
            > funds are
            > > now being dumped on the U.S. government and American
            taxpayers. We
            > are
            > > borrowing over 700 billion dollars each year from foreigners
            to
            > finance this
            > > extravagance, and we now qualify as the greatest international
            > debtor nation
            > > in history. Excessive consumption using borrowed money is
            hardly
            > the way to
            > > secure a sound economy.
            > >
            > > Instead of reining in government spending, Congress remains
            > oblivious to the
            > > financial dangers and panders to special interests by offering
            no
            > resistance
            > > whatsoever to every request for new spending. Congress spends
            > nearly 2 ½
            > > trillion dollars annually in an attempt to satisfy everyone's
            > demands. The
            > > system has generated over 200 trillion dollars of derivatives.
            > These
            > > problems can't be addressed with token leadership changes and
            > tinkering with
            > > the budget. A new and a dramatic direction is required.
            > >
            > > As current policy further erodes the budget, special interests
            and
            > members
            > > of Congress become even more aggressive in their efforts to
            > capture a piece
            > > of the dwindling economic pie. That success is the measure of
            > effectiveness
            > > that guarantees a member's re-election.
            > >
            > > The biggest rip-off of all - the paper money system that is
            > morally and
            > > economically equivalent to counterfeiting - is never
            questioned.
            > It is the
            > > deceptive tool for transferring billions from the unsuspecting
            > poor and
            > > middle-class to the special interest rich. And in the process,
            the
            > > deficit-propelled budget process supports the spending demands
            of
            > all the
            > > special interests - left and right, welfare and warfare -
            while
            > delaying
            > > payment to another day and sometimes even to another
            generation.
            > >
            > > The enormous sums spent each year to support the influential
            > special
            > > interests expand exponentially, and no one really asks how it's
            > > accomplished. Raising taxes to balance the budget is out of
            the
            > question -
            > > and rightfully so. Foreigners have been generous in their
            > willingness to
            > > loan us most of what we need, but even that generosity is
            limited
            > and may
            > > well diminish in the future.
            > >
            > > But if the Federal Reserve did not pick up the slack and
            create
            > huge amounts
            > > of new credit and money out of thin air, interest rates would
            rise
            > and call
            > > a halt to the charade. The people who suffer from a
            depreciated
            > dollar don't
            > > understand why they suffer, while the people who benefit
            promote
            > the corrupt
            > > system. The wealthy clean up on Wall Street, and the
            > unsophisticated buy in
            > > as the market tops off. Wealth is transferred from one group
            to
            > another, and
            > > it's all related to the system that allows politicians and the
            > central banks
            > > to create money out of thin air. It's literally legalized
            > counterfeiting.
            > >
            > > Is it any wonder jobs go overseas? True capital only comes
            from
            > savings, and
            > > Americans save nothing. We only borrow and consume. A
            > counterfeiter has no
            > > incentive to take his newly created money and build factories.
            The
            > incentive
            > > for Americans is to buy consumer goods from other countries
            whose
            > people are
            > > willing to save and invest in their factories and jobs. The
            only
            > way we can
            > > continue this charade is to borrow excess dollars back from
            the
            > foreign
            > > governments who sell us goods, and perpetuate the pretense of
            > wealth that we
            > > enjoy.
            > >
            > > The system of money contributes significantly to the problem
            of
            > illegal
            > > immigration. On the surface, immigrants escaping poverty in
            Mexico
            > and
            > > Central America come here for the economic opportunity that
            our
            > economy
            > > offers. However, the social services they receive, including
            > education and
            > > medical benefits - as well as the jobs they get - are
            dependent on
            > our
            > > perpetual indebtedness to foreign countries. When the burden
            of
            > debt becomes
            > > excessive, this incentive to seek prosperity here in the
            United
            > States will
            > > change.
            > >
            > > The prime beneficiaries of a paper money system are those who
            use
            > the money
            > > early - governments, politicians, bankers, international
            > corporations, and
            > > the military industrial complex. Those who suffer most are the
            > ones at the
            > > end of the money chain - the people forced to use depreciated
            > dollars to buy
            > > urgently needed goods and services to survive. And guess what?
            By
            > then their
            > > money is worth less, prices soar, and their standard of living
            > goes down.
            > >
            > > The consequences of this system, fully in place for the past
            > thirty-four
            > > years, are astronomical and impossible to accurately measure.
            > Industries go
            > > offshore and the jobs follow. Price inflation eats away at the
            > middle class,
            > > and deficits soar while spending escalates rapidly as Congress
            > hopes to keep
            > > up with the problems it created. The remaining wealth that we
            > struggle to
            > > hold onto is based on debt, future tax revenues, and our
            ability to
            > > manufacture new dollars without restraint. There's only one
            > problem: it all
            > > depends on trust in the dollar, especially by foreign holders
            and
            > > purchasers. This trust will end, and signs of the beginning of
            the
            > end are
            > > already appearing.
            > >
            > > During this administration the dollar has suffered severely as
            a
            > consequence
            > > of the policy of inflating the currency to pay our bills. The
            > dollar price
            > > of gold has more than doubled ($252 to $560 per ounce, a 122 %
            > increase).
            > > This means the dollar has depreciated in terms of gold, the
            time-
            > honored and
            > > reliable measurement of a nation's currency, by an astounding
            55%.
            > The
            > > long-term economic health of the nation is measured by the
            > soundness of its
            > > currency. Once Rome converted from a republic to an empire,
            she
            > depreciated
            > > her currency to pay the bills. This eventually led to Rome's
            > downfall. That
            > > is exactly what America is facing unless we change our ways.
            > >
            > > Now this is a real scandal worth worrying about. Since it's
            not
            > yet on
            > > Washington's radar screen, no attempt at addressing the
            problem is
            > being
            > > made. Instead, we'll be sure to make those the Constitution
            terms,
            > > "petitioners to redress their grievances" fill out more forms.
            > We'll make
            > > government officials attend more ethics courses so they can
            learn
            > how to be
            > > more ethical.
            > >
            > > A free nation, as it moves toward authoritarianism, tolerates
            and
            > hides a
            > > lot of abuse in the system. The human impulse for wealth
            creation
            > is hard to
            > > destroy. But in the end it will happen here, if true reform of
            our
            > economic,
            > > monetary, and political system is not accomplished.
            > >
            > > Whether government programs are promoted for "good" causes
            > (helping the
            > > poor), or bad causes (permitting a military-industrial complex
            to
            > capitalize
            > > on war profits), the principles of the market are undermined.
            > Eventually
            > > nearly everyone becomes dependent on the system of deficits,
            > borrowing,
            > > printing press money, and the special interest budget process
            that
            > > distributes loot by majority vote.
            > >
            > > Today, most business interests and the poor are dependent on
            > government
            > > handouts. Education and medical care are almost completely
            > controlled and
            > > regulated by an overpowering central government. We have come
            to
            > accept our
            > > role as world policemen and nation builder with little
            question,
            > despite the
            > > bad results and an inability to pay the bills.
            > >
            > > The question is, what will it take to bring about the changes
            in
            > policy
            > > needed to reverse this dangerous trend? The answer is: quite a
            > lot. And
            > > unfortunately it's not on the horizon. It probably won't come
            > until there is
            > > a rejection of the dollar as the safest and strongest world
            > currency, and a
            > > return to commodity money like gold and silver to restore
            > confidence.
            > >
            > > The Abramoff-type scandals come and go in Washington, patched
            over
            > with
            > > grandiose schemes of reform that amount to nothing but more
            > government and
            > > congressional mischief. But our efforts should be directed
            toward
            > > eliminating the greatest of all frauds - printing press money
            that
            > creates
            > > the political conditions breeding the vultures and leeches who
            > feed off the
            > > corrupt system.
            > >
            > > Counterfeiting money never creates wealth - it only steals
            wealth
            > from the
            > > unsuspecting. The Federal Reserve creation of money is exactly
            the
            > same.
            > > Increasing the dollars in circulation can only diminish the
            value
            > of each
            > > existing dollar. Only production and jobs can make a country
            > wealthy in the
            > > long run. Today it's obvious our country is becoming poorer
            and
            > more uneasy
            > > as our jobs and capital go overseas.
            > >
            > > The Abramoff scandal can serve a useful purpose if we put it
            in
            > context of
            > > the entire system that encourages corruption.
            > >
            > > If it's seen as an isolated case of individual corruption, and
            not
            > an
            > > expected consequence of big government run amuck, little good
            will
            > come of
            > > it. If we understand how our system of government intervenes
            in
            > our personal
            > > lives, the entire economy, and the internal affairs of nations
            > around the
            > > world, we can understand how it generates the conditions where
            > lobbyists
            > > thrive. Only then will some good come of it. Only then will we
            > understand
            > > that undermining the First amendment right of the people to
            > petition their
            > > government is hardly a solution to this much more serious and
            > pervasive
            > > problem.
            > >
            > > If we're inclined to improve conditions, we should give serious
            > > consideration to the following policy reforms, reforms the
            > American people
            > > who cherish liberty would enthusiastically support:
            > >
            > > 1.. No more "No Child Left Behind" legislation;
            > > 2.. No more prescription drug programs;
            > > 3.. No more undeclared wars;
            > > 4.. No more nation building;
            > > 5.. No more acting as the world policemen;
            > > 6.. No more deficits;
            > > 7.. Cut spending - everywhere;
            > > 8.. No more political and partisan resolutions designed to
            > embarrass those
            > > who may well have legitimate and honest disagreements with
            current
            > policy;
            > > 9.. No inferences that disagreeing with policy is
            unpatriotic or
            > disloyal
            > > to the country;
            > > 10.. No more pretense of budget reform while ignoring off-
            budget
            > spending
            > > and the ever-growing fourteen appropriations bills;
            > > 11.. Cut funding for corporate welfare, foreign aid,
            > international NGOs,
            > > defense contractors, the military industrial complex, and rich
            > corporate
            > > farmers before cutting welfare for the poor at home;
            > > 12.. No more unconstitutional intrusions into the privacy of
            law-
            > abiding
            > > American citizens;
            > > 13.. Reconsider the hysterical demands for security over
            liberty
            > by
            > > curtailing the ever-expanding and oppressive wars on drugs,
            tax
            > violators,
            > > and gun ownership.
            > > Finally, why not try something novel, like having Congress act
            as
            > an
            > > independent and equal branch of government? Restore the
            principle
            > of the
            > > separation of powers, so that we can perform our duty to
            provide
            > checks and
            > > balances on an executive branch (and an accommodating
            judiciary)
            > that spies
            > > on Americans, glorifies the welfare state, fights undeclared
            wars,
            > and
            > > enormously increases the national debt. Congress was not meant
            to
            > be a
            > > rubber stamp. It's time for a new direction.
            > >
            > > January 19, 2006
            > >
            > > Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
            > >
            > > Denise
            > >
            > > Denise Bensusan
            > > SPEAK OUT ARIZONA
            > > A Not for Profit Community Active Publication
            > > http://www.frontiernet.net/~denise.bensusan/
            > >
            > > "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the
            Constitution
            > of the
            > > United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people of
            the
            > United
            > > States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the
            Courts,
            > not to
            > > overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who
            pervert
            > the
            > > Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln
            > >
            > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > >
            > > Yahoo! Groups Links
            > >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > Yahoo! Groups Links
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            >
            >
            >
            >
            > _____
            >
            > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
            >
            >
            >
            > * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
            > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.
            >
            >
            > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
            > arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
            > <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
            subject=Unsubscribe>
            >
            >
            > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
            > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
            >
            >
            >
            > _____
            >
            >
            >
            > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            >








            Yahoo! Groups Links









            [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
          • Denise Bensusan
            Sandy, I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn t his family threatened the next time around or something and he backed away from the
            Message 5 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
              Sandy,

              I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn't his family threatened the next time around or something and he backed away from the race?

              I think Badnarik believes that the IRS violates the constitution and that's what makes it illegal. I have some docs that support this belief and will try to put my hands on them and forward them.

              I think the LP needs a different candidate (other than Badnarik) in order to become pliable. Just my personal opinion.



              ---- Original Message -----
              From: Sandra Price
              To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
              Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:26 AM
              Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


              Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the many
              issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement. Their
              candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression they want the
              government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael Badnarik on
              several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
              Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be interpreted and
              amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group of men who
              believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a part of the
              laws of America for many years under the authority of the House and Senate.




              The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done through the
              Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be dealing with
              many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to be declared
              criminals.



              I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the accepted rules
              of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on removing
              every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up under the Bush
              Administration and have shown themselves incapable of determining what is
              legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be designed and run
              by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control over our
              lives and will eliminate our state rights.



              I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over the authority
              of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S. Constitution. I do not
              want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate of
              Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American family has
              the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this choice taken
              away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a choice for the
              mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.

              HHHH



              There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways of changing
              what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find wrong and will
              end up supporting chaos.



              Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our elections
              in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have fallen overboard
              in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through the crap the
              current parties are selling at this time.



              I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they too are
              floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but not the way
              they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.



              Sandy Pricee has



              _____



              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




              Yahoo! Groups Links










              [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
            • Denise Bensusan
              Derek, Do you have an organized activist group at your college??? Denise ... From: Derek Williams To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com Sent: Sunday, January
              Message 6 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                Derek,

                Do you have an organized activist group at your college???


                Denise
                ----- Original Message -----
                From: Derek Williams
                To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 8:50 PM
                Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                I don't know what the problem with the LP is. I wrote a letter once
                to the national LP (the party itself), and all they did was write me
                back and tell me if I REALLY wanted to help, I should just give them
                money. Well, #1, I am in college right now, and everyone knows how
                broke college students are. I don't have any money to give right
                now. #2, IF I had money to give, I would want to have reason to
                believe that I was going to get a return on my investment. IE,
                candidates elected, or at least have some GOOD, respectable
                candidates run for office, and have someone come up with an idea of
                how to relate to the general public.

                I have many complaints about Libertarians running for office. We
                had a guy when I lived in Tampa, FL, who ran as a Libertarian for an
                office, who was a local strip bar owner and he was always in court
                fighting with the city, or the county, etc. He seemed to be on a
                one man crusade to be able to "do his thing". The problem with that
                is that he cannot relate to, nor will he get votes from, the
                Christian community or other normal, decent, family type people (the
                majority that you have to get support from). Most people see strip
                bar owners and adult book store owners as sleazy characters. I
                don't want them representing my party to the public. I cannot in
                good conscience (being a Christian) vote for a guy like that.

                Ron Paul is definitely respectable and a good guy. No wonder he
                keeps getting re-elected. I also think that Mike Badnarik will get
                elected this time in Texas. He is a respectable guy with good views
                on the issues. They have good careers away from politics and we
                need more people like these two running for office.

                I was actually disappointed in the FSP recently because they made
                such a big deal about the licensing of barbers, cosmetologists, and
                manicurists in NH. If you are unfamiliar with it, that was where
                one of the FSP members did a manucure without a license, and got
                arrested for it to get on the news. Now they have some bills
                pending to eliminate the requirements (or at least cut down on the
                training required) for barbers, cosmetologists, and manicurists.

                Ok, here is the thing: Even though I am not a big fan of state
                regulation, and barriers to entry in business, if these people
                (barbers, manucurists,etc) are not taught properly how to disinfect
                their appliances / tools, they can spread diseases to and among
                their clients. I read about singer / American Idol judge Paula
                Abdul getting a very nasty nail fungus a while back from a nail
                salon where they did not disinfect the tools. Here is a link to
                this story:

                http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/medicalnews.php?newsid=28361

                Reportedly, this infection was also spread to many other clients.

                Now, with stories like this going on, why in the world would the FSP
                pick THIS issue to fight for less regulation about? Do they think
                that the people of NH want to risk severe nail infection getting
                manucures? These bills will be squashed quickly.

                You can also get lice from non-sterile barber tools. I would not
                want to have to go through lice treatment because some unlicensed
                barber didn't sterilize his clippers. (Luckily, I cut my own hair
                with clippers at home, but most people cannot do this and have to
                trust that their barber's tools are sterile and clean.)

                So I think that this was a bad fight to pick. Better fights to pick
                would be about taxes (most people hate taxes), or the efforts of the
                FDA / Drug Companies / Codex Alimentarius commission to ban /
                overregulate dietary supplements, and some of the violations of
                privacy that are occurring as a result of the Patriot Act. I think
                there is more public support over health freedom than there is over
                any other issue. Nobody wants the government to tell them what they
                can and cannot put in their bodies.

                I recently wrote to Badnarik's campaign about this and he did not
                have health freedom in his platform, other than market reforms which
                benefit drug companies, making drugs cheaper for everyone. I wrote
                them about it (and how it should include protection for alternative
                medicine and dietary supplements and fair and accurate claims on
                such) and was invited to write a position paper on it of about 200
                words length. Now, his health care policy / position has health
                freedom in it. (I wrote the first 2 paragraphs of the statement,
                and they liked what I wrote enough to use it - the rest of it is
                theirs.)

                Ron Paul has campaigned for health freedom as well, and I think this
                contributes to his popularity. I think the public would be very
                supportive of a Gold or Silver standard also, if it were properly
                and simply explained to them so that they could understand it
                without taking too long and boring them, or confusing them. I think
                that nearly ALL senior citizens (a big voting block) would be very
                keen to adapt a Gold standard after it is explained to them that the
                reason their pension or SS money is worth less and less every year
                is because of inflation caused by printing more and more paper
                money. Newly married couples and college students should like it
                too, because it would keep them from being priced out of a house
                when they are ready to buy their first one. Christians should buy
                this as well, as paper money violates the Biblical standard of "just
                weights and measures". After all, your money is worth less and
                less, the more they print of it. Every loan they make that is not
                backed by Gold or at least deposits in the banks, is more money
                created out of thin air, which dilutes the purchasing power of every
                dollar you and I work so hard for.

                Funny how we could not imagine buying gas or vegetables without that
                state dept. of Agriculture certification that the scales or pump are
                accurate, but we allow the government to water down our money supply
                so that they can spend more and more and then just pay it back with
                inflated dollars further on down the road. If someone explained
                this to the public, they should be able to win a debate easily. Why
                do the Libertarians not articulate this clearly in debates or
                advertisements?

                By the way, I went to a couple of Libertarian meetings in Maricopa
                County. I have not been to one yet in Tucson. I found somewhere on
                the web where they meet, but just haven't made it out to a meeting
                yet.

                These are just my thoughts. What do you all think about these
                issues?

                Derek








                --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price" <s@r...>
                wrote:
                >
                > Do we even have an active LP organization here? I attended the LP
                > Convention in Tucson in 2004 and was not impressed with the
                choices of
                > candidates. From what I understand, the LP will not vote, even for
                > themselves. To hell with that!
                >
                >
                >
                > Sandy Price
                >
                >
                >
                > -----Original Message-----
                > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
                Bensusan
                > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 12:53 PM
                > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                > Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction
                >
                >
                >
                > Heck..I think he should run for president!!! I have not seen too
                much that
                > Ron Paul speaks about that I disagree with.
                > ----- Original Message -----
                > From: Derek
                > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                > Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2006 9:59 AM
                > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction
                >
                >
                > Ron Paul speaks for me as well. I was wondering, does anyone
                know
                > who is going to run for the US House seat being vacated at the
                end
                > of this term by Jim Kolbe in Tucson? This might be a good time
                for
                > a Libertarian to step up and try to win this seat. Or even if
                we
                > could get another "Ron Paul - type Republican" that would be
                good
                > too. Anything other than another "rubber stamp" for Bush's
                > shenanigans.
                >
                > Derek Williams
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Sandra Price"
                <s@r...>
                > wrote:
                > >
                > > Words of wisdom! He speaks for me!!
                > >
                > > Sandy Price
                > >
                > > -----Original Message-----
                > > From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                > > [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise
                > Bensusan
                > > Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:18 PM
                > > To: "SPEAK OUT ARIZONA"
                > > Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Searching for a New Direction
                > >
                > > Forwarded for your interest:
                > >
                > > Searching for a New Direction
                > >
                > > by Ron Paul
                > > by Ron Paul
                > >
                > >
                > >
                > > Before the US House of Representatives, January 18, 2006
                > >
                > > The Abramoff scandal has been described as the biggest
                Washington
                > scandal
                > > ever: bigger than Watergate; bigger than Abscam; bigger than
                > Koreagate;
                > > bigger than the House banking scandal; bigger than Teapot
                Dome.
                > Possibly so.
                > > It's certainly serious and significant.
                > >
                > > It has prompted urgent proposals of suggested reforms to deal
                with
                > the mess.
                > > If only we have more rules and regulations, more reporting
                > requirements, and
                > > stricter enforcement of laws, the American people will be
                assured
                > we mean
                > > business. Ethics and character will return to the halls of
                > Congress. It is
                > > argued that new champions of reform should be elected to
                leadership
                > > positions, to show how serious we are about dealing with the
                > crisis of
                > > confidence generated by the Abramoff affair. Then all will be
                > well. But it's
                > > not so simple. Maybe what we have seen so far is just the tip
                of
                > the
                > > iceberg, an insidious crisis staring us in the face that we
                refuse
                > to
                > > properly identify and deal with.
                > >
                > > It's been suggested we need to change course and correct the
                way
                > Congress is
                > > run. A good idea, but if we merely tinker with current
                attitudes
                > about what
                > > role the federal government ought to play in our lives, it
                won't
                > do much to
                > > solve the ethics crisis. True reform is impossible without
                > addressing the
                > > immorality of wealth redistribution. Merely electing new
                leaders
                > and writing
                > > more rules to regulate those who petition Congress will
                achieve
                > nothing.
                > >
                > > Could it be that we're all looking in the wrong places for a
                > solution to
                > > recurring, constant, and pervasive corruption in government?
                > Perhaps some of
                > > us in Congress are mistaken about the true problem; perhaps
                others
                > > deliberately distract us from exposing the truth about how
                > miserably corrupt
                > > the budget process in Congress is. Others simply are in a
                state of
                > denial.
                > > But the denial will come to an end as the Abramoff scandal
                reveals
                > more and
                > > more. It eventually will expose the scandal of the ages: how
                and
                > to what
                > > degree the American people have become indebted by the totally
                > irresponsible
                > > spending habits of the U.S. Congress - as encouraged by
                successive
                > > administrations, condoned by our courts, and enjoyed by the
                > recipients of
                > > the largesse.
                > >
                > > This system of government is coming to an end - a fact that
                > significantly
                > > contributes to the growing anxiety of most Americans,
                especially
                > those who
                > > pay the bills and receive little in return from the corrupt
                system
                > that has
                > > evolved over the decades.
                > >
                > > Believe me, if everybody benefited equally there would be
                scant
                > outcry over
                > > a little bribery and influence peddling. As our country grows
                > poorer and
                > > more indebted, fewer people benefit. The beneficiaries are not
                the
                > > hard-working, honest people who pay the taxes. The groups that
                > master the
                > > system of lobbying and special interest legislation are the
                ones
                > who truly
                > > benefit.
                > >
                > > The steady erosion of real wealth in this country, and the
                > dependency on
                > > government generated by welfarism and warfarism, presents
                itself
                > as the
                > > crisis of the ages. Lobbying scandals and the need for new
                > leadership are
                > > mere symptoms of a much, much deeper problem.
                > >
                > > There are quite a few reasons a relatively free country allows
                > itself to
                > > fall into such an ethical and financial mess.
                > >
                > > One major contributing factor for the past hundred years is
                our
                > serious
                > > misunderstanding of the dangers of pure democracy. The
                founders
                > detested
                > > democracy and avoided the use of the word in all the early
                > documents. Today,
                > > most Americans accept without question a policy of sacrificing
                > life,
                > > property, and dollars to force "democracy" on a country 6,000
                > miles away.
                > > This tells us how little opposition there is to "democracy."
                No one
                > > questions the principle that a majority electorate should be
                > allowed to rule
                > > the country, dictate rights, and redistribute wealth.
                > >
                > > Our system of democracy has come to mean worshipping the
                notion
                > that a
                > > majority vote for the distribution of government largesse,
                loot
                > confiscated
                > > from the American people through an immoral tax system, is
                morally
                > and
                > > constitutionally acceptable. Under these circumstances it's no
                > wonder a
                > > system of runaway lobbying and special interests has
                developed.
                > Add this to
                > > the military industrial complex that developed over the
                decades
                > due to a
                > > foreign policy of perpetual war and foreign military
                intervention,
                > and we
                > > shouldn't wonder why there is such a powerful motivation to
                learn
                > the tricks
                > > of the lobbying trade - and why former members of Congress and
                > their aides
                > > become such high-priced commodities. Buying influence is much
                more
                > lucrative
                > > than working and producing for a living. The trouble is the
                > process invites
                > > moral corruption. The dollars involved grow larger and larger
                > because of the
                > > deficit financing and inflation that pure democracy always
                > generates.
                > >
                > > Dealing with lobbying scandals while ignoring the scandal of
                > > unconstitutional runaway government will solve nothing. If
                people
                > truly
                > > believe that reform is the solution, through regulating
                lobbyists
                > and
                > > increasing congressional reporting requirements, the real
                problem
                > will be
                > > ignored and never identified. This reform only makes things
                worse.
                > >
                > > Greater regulation of lobbyists is a dangerous and unnecessary
                > proposition.
                > > If one expects to solve a problem without correctly
                identifying
                > its source,
                > > the problem persists. The First amendment clearly
                > states: "Congress shall
                > > make no laws respecting.the right of the people.to petition
                the
                > government
                > > for a redress of grievances." That means NO law!
                > >
                > > The problem of special interest government that breeds
                corruption
                > comes from
                > > our lack of respect for the Constitution in the first place.
                So
                > what do we
                > > do? We further violate the Constitution rather than examine it
                for
                > guidance
                > > as to the proper role of the federal government. Laws
                addressing
                > bribery,
                > > theft, and fraud, already on the books, are adequate to deal
                with
                > the
                > > criminal activities associated with lobbying. New laws and
                > regulations are
                > > unnecessary.
                > >
                > > The theft that the federal government commits against its
                > citizens, and the
                > > power that Congress has assumed illegally, are the real crimes
                > that need to
                > > be dealt with. In this regard we truly do need a new
                direction.
                > Get rid of
                > > the evil tax system; the fraudulent monetary system; and the
                power
                > of
                > > government to run our lives, the economy, and the world; and
                the
                > Abramoff
                > > types would be exposed for the mere gnats they are. There
                would be
                > a lot
                > > less of them, since the incentives to buy politicians would be
                > removed.
                > >
                > > Even under today's flawed system of democratic government,
                which is
                > > dedicated to redistributing property by force, a lot could be
                > accomplished
                > > if government attracted men and women of good will and
                character.
                > Members
                > > could refuse to yield to the temptations of office, and reject
                the
                > path to a
                > > lobbying career. But it seems once government adopts the rules
                of
                > > immorality, some of the participants in the process yield to
                the
                > temptation
                > > as well, succumbing to the belief that the new moral standards
                are
                > > acceptable.
                > >
                > > Today though, any new rules designed to restrain special
                interest
                > favoritism
                > > will only push the money further under the table. Too much is
                at
                > stake.
                > > Corporations, bureaucrats, lobbyists, and politicians have
                grown
                > accustomed
                > > to the system, and have learned to work within it to survive.
                Only
                > when the
                > > trough is emptied will the country wake up. Eliminating
                earmarks
                > in the
                > > budget will not solve the problem.
                > >
                > > Comparing the current scandal to the "big" one, the Abramoff
                types
                > are petty
                > > thieves. The government deals in trillions of dollars; the
                > Abramoffs in mere
                > > tens of millions. Take a look at the undeclared war we're
                bogged
                > down in
                > > 6,000 miles from our shores. We've spent 300 billion dollars
                > already, but
                > > Nobel prize winner Joseph Stiglitz argues that the war
                actually
                > will cost
                > > between one and two trillion dollars when it's all over and
                done
                > with.
                > > That's trillions, not billions. Even that figure is
                unpredictable,
                > because
                > > we may be in Iraq another year or ten - who knows? Considering
                the
                > war had
                > > nothing to do with our national security, we're talking big
                bucks
                > being
                > > wasted and lining the pockets of many well-connected American
                > corporations.
                > > Waste, fraud, stupidity, and no-bid contracts characterize the
                > process. And
                > > it's all done in the name of patriotism and national security.
                > Dissenters
                > > are accused of supporting the enemy. Now this is a rip-off
                that a
                > little
                > > tinkering with House rules and restraints on lobbyists won't
                do
                > much to
                > > solve.
                > >
                > > Think of how this undeclared war has contributed to our
                national
                > deficit,
                > > undermined military morale and preparedness, antagonized our
                > allies, and
                > > exposed us to an even greater threat from those who resent our
                > destructive
                > > occupation. Claiming we have no interests in the oil of the
                entire
                > Middle
                > > East hardly helps our credibility throughout the world.
                > >
                > > The system of special interest government that has evolved
                over
                > the last
                > > several decades has given us a national debt of over eight
                > trillion dollars,
                > > a debt that now expands by over 600 billion dollars each year.
                Our
                > total
                > > obligations are estimated between fifteen and twenty trillion
                > dollars. Most
                > > people realize the Social Security system, the Medicare
                system,
                > and the new
                > > prescription drug plan are unfunded. Thousands of private
                pension
                > funds are
                > > now being dumped on the U.S. government and American
                taxpayers. We
                > are
                > > borrowing over 700 billion dollars each year from foreigners
                to
                > finance this
                > > extravagance, and we now qualify as the greatest international
                > debtor nation
                > > in history. Excessive consumption using borrowed money is
                hardly
                > the way to
                > > secure a sound economy.
                > >
                > > Instead of reining in government spending, Congress remains
                > oblivious to the
                > > financial dangers and panders to special interests by offering
                no
                > resistance
                > > whatsoever to every request for new spending. Congress spends
                > nearly 2 ½
                > > trillion dollars annually in an attempt to satisfy everyone's
                > demands. The
                > > system has generated over 200 trillion dollars of derivatives.
                > These
                > > problems can't be addressed with token leadership changes and
                > tinkering with
                > > the budget. A new and a dramatic direction is required.
                > >
                > > As current policy further erodes the budget, special interests
                and
                > members
                > > of Congress become even more aggressive in their efforts to
                > capture a piece
                > > of the dwindling economic pie. That success is the measure of
                > effectiveness
                > > that guarantees a member's re-election.
                > >
                > > The biggest rip-off of all - the paper money system that is
                > morally and
                > > economically equivalent to counterfeiting - is never
                questioned.
                > It is the
                > > deceptive tool for transferring billions from the unsuspecting
                > poor and
                > > middle-class to the special interest rich. And in the process,
                the
                > > deficit-propelled budget process supports the spending demands
                of
                > all the
                > > special interests - left and right, welfare and warfare -
                while
                > delaying
                > > payment to another day and sometimes even to another
                generation.
                > >
                > > The enormous sums spent each year to support the influential
                > special
                > > interests expand exponentially, and no one really asks how it's
                > > accomplished. Raising taxes to balance the budget is out of
                the
                > question -
                > > and rightfully so. Foreigners have been generous in their
                > willingness to
                > > loan us most of what we need, but even that generosity is
                limited
                > and may
                > > well diminish in the future.
                > >
                > > But if the Federal Reserve did not pick up the slack and
                create
                > huge amounts
                > > of new credit and money out of thin air, interest rates would
                rise
                > and call
                > > a halt to the charade. The people who suffer from a
                depreciated
                > dollar don't
                > > understand why they suffer, while the people who benefit
                promote
                > the corrupt
                > > system. The wealthy clean up on Wall Street, and the
                > unsophisticated buy in
                > > as the market tops off. Wealth is transferred from one group
                to
                > another, and
                > > it's all related to the system that allows politicians and the
                > central banks
                > > to create money out of thin air. It's literally legalized
                > counterfeiting.
                > >
                > > Is it any wonder jobs go overseas? True capital only comes
                from
                > savings, and
                > > Americans save nothing. We only borrow and consume. A
                > counterfeiter has no
                > > incentive to take his newly created money and build factories.
                The
                > incentive
                > > for Americans is to buy consumer goods from other countries
                whose
                > people are
                > > willing to save and invest in their factories and jobs. The
                only
                > way we can
                > > continue this charade is to borrow excess dollars back from
                the
                > foreign
                > > governments who sell us goods, and perpetuate the pretense of
                > wealth that we
                > > enjoy.
                > >
                > > The system of money contributes significantly to the problem
                of
                > illegal
                > > immigration. On the surface, immigrants escaping poverty in
                Mexico
                > and
                > > Central America come here for the economic opportunity that
                our
                > economy
                > > offers. However, the social services they receive, including
                > education and
                > > medical benefits - as well as the jobs they get - are
                dependent on
                > our
                > > perpetual indebtedness to foreign countries. When the burden
                of
                > debt becomes
                > > excessive, this incentive to seek prosperity here in the
                United
                > States will
                > > change.
                > >
                > > The prime beneficiaries of a paper money system are those who
                use
                > the money
                > > early - governments, politicians, bankers, international
                > corporations, and
                > > the military industrial complex. Those who suffer most are the
                > ones at the
                > > end of the money chain - the people forced to use depreciated
                > dollars to buy
                > > urgently needed goods and services to survive. And guess what?
                By
                > then their
                > > money is worth less, prices soar, and their standard of living
                > goes down.
                > >
                > > The consequences of this system, fully in place for the past
                > thirty-four
                > > years, are astronomical and impossible to accurately measure.
                > Industries go
                > > offshore and the jobs follow. Price inflation eats away at the
                > middle class,
                > > and deficits soar while spending escalates rapidly as Congress
                > hopes to keep
                > > up with the problems it created. The remaining wealth that we
                > struggle to
                > > hold onto is based on debt, future tax revenues, and our
                ability to
                > > manufacture new dollars without restraint. There's only one
                > problem: it all
                > > depends on trust in the dollar, especially by foreign holders
                and
                > > purchasers. This trust will end, and signs of the beginning of
                the
                > end are
                > > already appearing.
                > >
                > > During this administration the dollar has suffered severely as
                a
                > consequence
                > > of the policy of inflating the currency to pay our bills. The
                > dollar price
                > > of gold has more than doubled ($252 to $560 per ounce, a 122 %
                > increase).
                > > This means the dollar has depreciated in terms of gold, the
                time-
                > honored and
                > > reliable measurement of a nation's currency, by an astounding
                55%.
                > The
                > > long-term economic health of the nation is measured by the
                > soundness of its
                > > currency. Once Rome converted from a republic to an empire,
                she
                > depreciated
                > > her currency to pay the bills. This eventually led to Rome's
                > downfall. That
                > > is exactly what America is facing unless we change our ways.
                > >
                > > Now this is a real scandal worth worrying about. Since it's
                not
                > yet on
                > > Washington's radar screen, no attempt at addressing the
                problem is
                > being
                > > made. Instead, we'll be sure to make those the Constitution
                terms,
                > > "petitioners to redress their grievances" fill out more forms.
                > We'll make
                > > government officials attend more ethics courses so they can
                learn
                > how to be
                > > more ethical.
                > >
                > > A free nation, as it moves toward authoritarianism, tolerates
                and
                > hides a
                > > lot of abuse in the system. The human impulse for wealth
                creation
                > is hard to
                > > destroy. But in the end it will happen here, if true reform of
                our
                > economic,
                > > monetary, and political system is not accomplished.
                > >
                > > Whether government programs are promoted for "good" causes
                > (helping the
                > > poor), or bad causes (permitting a military-industrial complex
                to
                > capitalize
                > > on war profits), the principles of the market are undermined.
                > Eventually
                > > nearly everyone becomes dependent on the system of deficits,
                > borrowing,
                > > printing press money, and the special interest budget process
                that
                > > distributes loot by majority vote.
                > >
                > > Today, most business interests and the poor are dependent on
                > government
                > > handouts. Education and medical care are almost completely
                > controlled and
                > > regulated by an overpowering central government. We have come
                to
                > accept our
                > > role as world policemen and nation builder with little
                question,
                > despite the
                > > bad results and an inability to pay the bills.
                > >
                > > The question is, what will it take to bring about the changes
                in
                > policy
                > > needed to reverse this dangerous trend? The answer is: quite a
                > lot. And
                > > unfortunately it's not on the horizon. It probably won't come
                > until there is
                > > a rejection of the dollar as the safest and strongest world
                > currency, and a
                > > return to commodity money like gold and silver to restore
                > confidence.
                > >
                > > The Abramoff-type scandals come and go in Washington, patched
                over
                > with
                > > grandiose schemes of reform that amount to nothing but more
                > government and
                > > congressional mischief. But our efforts should be directed
                toward
                > > eliminating the greatest of all frauds - printing press money
                that
                > creates
                > > the political conditions breeding the vultures and leeches who
                > feed off the
                > > corrupt system.
                > >
                > > Counterfeiting money never creates wealth - it only steals
                wealth
                > from the
                > > unsuspecting. The Federal Reserve creation of money is exactly
                the
                > same.
                > > Increasing the dollars in circulation can only diminish the
                value
                > of each
                > > existing dollar. Only production and jobs can make a country
                > wealthy in the
                > > long run. Today it's obvious our country is becoming poorer
                and
                > more uneasy
                > > as our jobs and capital go overseas.
                > >
                > > The Abramoff scandal can serve a useful purpose if we put it
                in
                > context of
                > > the entire system that encourages corruption.
                > >
                > > If it's seen as an isolated case of individual corruption, and
                not
                > an
                > > expected consequence of big government run amuck, little good
                will
                > come of
                > > it. If we understand how our system of government intervenes
                in
                > our personal
                > > lives, the entire economy, and the internal affairs of nations
                > around the
                > > world, we can understand how it generates the conditions where
                > lobbyists
                > > thrive. Only then will some good come of it. Only then will we
                > understand
                > > that undermining the First amendment right of the people to
                > petition their
                > > government is hardly a solution to this much more serious and
                > pervasive
                > > problem.
                > >
                > > If we're inclined to improve conditions, we should give serious
                > > consideration to the following policy reforms, reforms the
                > American people
                > > who cherish liberty would enthusiastically support:
                > >
                > > 1.. No more "No Child Left Behind" legislation;
                > > 2.. No more prescription drug programs;
                > > 3.. No more undeclared wars;
                > > 4.. No more nation building;
                > > 5.. No more acting as the world policemen;
                > > 6.. No more deficits;
                > > 7.. Cut spending - everywhere;
                > > 8.. No more political and partisan resolutions designed to
                > embarrass those
                > > who may well have legitimate and honest disagreements with
                current
                > policy;
                > > 9.. No inferences that disagreeing with policy is
                unpatriotic or
                > disloyal
                > > to the country;
                > > 10.. No more pretense of budget reform while ignoring off-
                budget
                > spending
                > > and the ever-growing fourteen appropriations bills;
                > > 11.. Cut funding for corporate welfare, foreign aid,
                > international NGOs,
                > > defense contractors, the military industrial complex, and rich
                > corporate
                > > farmers before cutting welfare for the poor at home;
                > > 12.. No more unconstitutional intrusions into the privacy of
                law-
                > abiding
                > > American citizens;
                > > 13.. Reconsider the hysterical demands for security over
                liberty
                > by
                > > curtailing the ever-expanding and oppressive wars on drugs,
                tax
                > violators,
                > > and gun ownership.
                > > Finally, why not try something novel, like having Congress act
                as
                > an
                > > independent and equal branch of government? Restore the
                principle
                > of the
                > > separation of powers, so that we can perform our duty to
                provide
                > checks and
                > > balances on an executive branch (and an accommodating
                judiciary)
                > that spies
                > > on Americans, glorifies the welfare state, fights undeclared
                wars,
                > and
                > > enormously increases the national debt. Congress was not meant
                to
                > be a
                > > rubber stamp. It's time for a new direction.
                > >
                > > January 19, 2006
                > >
                > > Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican member of Congress from Texas.
                > >
                > > Denise
                > >
                > > Denise Bensusan
                > > SPEAK OUT ARIZONA
                > > A Not for Profit Community Active Publication
                > > http://www.frontiernet.net/~denise.bensusan/
                > >
                > > "Our safety, our liberty, depends upon preserving the
                Constitution
                > of the
                > > United States as our Fathers made it inviolate. The people of
                the
                > United
                > > States are the rightful masters of both Congress and the
                Courts,
                > not to
                > > overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who
                pervert
                > the
                > > Constitution." - Abraham Lincoln
                > >
                > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                > >
                > >
                > >
                > >
                > > Yahoo! Groups Links
                > >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > Yahoo! Groups Links
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                >
                >
                >
                >
                > _____
                >
                > YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
                >
                >
                >
                > * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                > <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.
                >
                >
                > * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                > arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                > <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?
                subject=Unsubscribe>
                >
                >
                > * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.
                >
                >
                >
                > _____
                >
                >
                >
                > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                >








                Yahoo! Groups Links









                [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
              • Derek
                I didn t really see anything wrong with Badnarik. Truth be told, however, I did like Aaron Russo better before Badnarik was selected over him. I do not think
                Message 7 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                  I didn't really see anything wrong with Badnarik. Truth be told,
                  however, I did like Aaron Russo better before Badnarik was selected
                  over him.

                  I do not think we have a chance of winning the white house any time
                  soon, however, I do think that it adds to our legitimacy to run
                  somebody for the office each time. I DO, however, think that we can
                  very possibly win US House seats in certain areas, and I think that
                  Badnarik may just be in such an area to win this time.

                  I think that if we run good people like Badnarik, Russo, etc, for US
                  house seats in carefully selected areas where they have a good
                  chance of winning (like NH or Texas or Nevada), and they do a good
                  job and don't embarrass the party when they win, it will help us to
                  look more legitimate and then we can run for statewide seats like
                  Governor and US Senator and actually be competitive.

                  I also think that we need to tone down the "crazier" elements of our
                  party's positions and emphasize more the ones that more of the
                  general public will accept. The way the democrats and republicans
                  got us into this mess was a little at a time. Short of another
                  revolutionary war, or state seccession, probably the only peaceful
                  way to take it back is by incrementalization also. I would define
                  the "crazier" elements as the legalization of drugs, prostitution,
                  and polygamy. Most average Americans simply will not accept these
                  things. So why even mention them? They should not even be
                  mentioned as issues.

                  But Gold backed money, abolition of the IRS, and removing barriers
                  to entry for small businesses would all be popular causes. And I
                  did not know that Badnarik was involved with some of the "tax
                  protestor" people. I used to live in rural NC, and we had a lot of
                  tax protestors and militia members back there. Most of the tax
                  protestors went to PRISON as soon as they were caught and tried.
                  And judges do not even let them use their "unconstitutional"
                  arguments in court. So it would benefit us to tell our candidates
                  to not even use that line, and instead legislate away the IRS in
                  congress and the senate. If the gov't still insisted on a national
                  tax of some sort, it should be limited to something like a 1%
                  national sales tax, but have it capped to only 1% max by a
                  constitutional amendment. I think that would be popular.

                  Also, it wouldn't hurt us to find some well known celebrity
                  candidates to run for office, that wouldn't do something stupid and
                  embarrass us. I have read that Clint Eastwood (although he is too
                  old), and Woody Harrelson are Libertarians. Pro Wrestler Val Venis
                  (real name Sean Morey) is too, although Sean is a Canadian. Jesse
                  Ventura, even though he ran as a Reform Party candidate, espouses
                  many Libertarian beliefs. I was very happy when Jesse won the
                  governorship of Minnesota. That shows that it can be done. And
                  even if we never win the white house, if we can win enough of the
                  House and senate and state seats, we could still get a lot done and
                  send a strong message that people are tired of the police state.

                  Derek






                  --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Denise Bensusan"
                  <denise.bensusan@f...> wrote:
                  >
                  > Sandy,
                  >
                  > I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn't
                  his family threatened the next time around or something and he
                  backed away from the race?
                  >
                  > I think Badnarik believes that the IRS violates the constitution
                  and that's what makes it illegal. I have some docs that support
                  this belief and will try to put my hands on them and forward them.
                  >
                  > I think the LP needs a different candidate (other than Badnarik)
                  in order to become pliable. Just my personal opinion.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > ---- Original Message -----
                  > From: Sandra Price
                  > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                  > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:26 AM
                  > Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New
                  Direction
                  >
                  >
                  > Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP
                  for the many
                  > issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian
                  movement. Their
                  > candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression
                  they want the
                  > government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael
                  Badnarik on
                  > several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
                  > Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be
                  interpreted and
                  > amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group
                  of men who
                  > believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a
                  part of the
                  > laws of America for many years under the authority of the House
                  and Senate.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done
                  through the
                  > Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be
                  dealing with
                  > many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to
                  be declared
                  > criminals.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the
                  accepted rules
                  > of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on
                  removing
                  > every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up
                  under the Bush
                  > Administration and have shown themselves incapable of
                  determining what is
                  > legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be
                  designed and run
                  > by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control
                  over our
                  > lives and will eliminate our state rights.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over
                  the authority
                  > of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S.
                  Constitution. I do not
                  > want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate
                  of
                  > Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American
                  family has
                  > the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this
                  choice taken
                  > away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a
                  choice for the
                  > mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.
                  >
                  > HHHH
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways
                  of changing
                  > what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find
                  wrong and will
                  > end up supporting chaos.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our
                  elections
                  > in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have
                  fallen overboard
                  > in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through
                  the crap the
                  > current parties are selling at this time.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they
                  too are
                  > floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but
                  not the way
                  > they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > Sandy Pricee has
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > _____
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > Yahoo! Groups Links
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  >
                  > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                  >
                • Sandra Price
                  Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working legitimately and honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing Michael Badnarik
                  Message 8 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                    Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working legitimately and
                    honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing Michael
                    Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an inside source on
                    this information and will share it with you when the last two are in prison.
                    Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done time for
                    extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any signs up with
                    these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the near future.
                    Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very close to
                    coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop believing in the
                    tooth fairy.



                    I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government. I do
                    recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid gold fringe
                    on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan stupid silly.
                    The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed. Simply
                    breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into prison. I'm
                    tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We tried it in 1970
                    when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped would gather
                    enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the voters. One of the
                    writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was Oliver Ray Price
                    (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality of this
                    petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.



                    For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of California and the
                    people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax system was fine.
                    HHHH

                    You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join his
                    organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                    but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                    work to change the law.



                    Sandy



                    -----Original Message-----
                    From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                    [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                    Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:09 AM
                    To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                    Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                    Sandy,

                    I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn't his family
                    threatened the next time around or something and he backed away from the
                    race?

                    I think Badnarik believes that the IRS violates the constitution and that's
                    what makes it illegal. I have some docs that support this belief and will
                    try to put my hands on them and forward them.

                    I think the LP needs a different candidate (other than Badnarik) in order to
                    become pliable. Just my personal opinion.



                    ---- Original Message -----
                    From: Sandra Price
                    To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                    Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:26 AM
                    Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                    Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the
                    many
                    issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement.
                    Their
                    candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression they want the
                    government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael Badnarik on
                    several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
                    Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be interpreted and
                    amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group of men who
                    believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a part of
                    the
                    laws of America for many years under the authority of the House and
                    Senate.




                    The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done through the
                    Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be dealing with
                    many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to be
                    declared
                    criminals.



                    I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the accepted
                    rules
                    of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on removing
                    every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up under the Bush
                    Administration and have shown themselves incapable of determining what is
                    legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be designed and run
                    by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control over our
                    lives and will eliminate our state rights.



                    I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over the
                    authority
                    of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S. Constitution. I do not
                    want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate of
                    Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American family has
                    the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this choice
                    taken
                    away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a choice for
                    the
                    mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.

                    HHHH



                    There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways of
                    changing
                    what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find wrong and
                    will
                    end up supporting chaos.



                    Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our elections
                    in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have fallen
                    overboard
                    in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through the crap
                    the
                    current parties are selling at this time.



                    I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they too are
                    floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but not the way
                    they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.



                    Sandy Pricee has



                    _____



                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                    Yahoo! Groups Links










                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                    _____

                    YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                    * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                    * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                    arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                    <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                    * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                    <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                    _____



                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                  • Denise Bensusan
                    Sandy said: You ve been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join his organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead but
                    Message 9 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                      Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join his
                      organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                      but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                      work to change the law."

                      Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply stated that I have some documents and information that support the premise that the IRS is indeed in violation of the Constitution.

                      As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in different ways. Just because someone believes that the IRS is unconstitutional does not make them a criminal and does not mean they are headed for the pokey. Free speech is still legal...well at least for today...LOL

                      Great points however...thanks for sharing them.


                      ----- Original Message -----
                      From: Sandra Price
                      To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                      Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                      Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                      Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working legitimately and
                      honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing Michael
                      Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an inside source on
                      this information and will share it with you when the last two are in prison.
                      Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done time for
                      extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any signs up with
                      these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the near future.
                      Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very close to
                      coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop believing in the
                      tooth fairy.



                      I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government. I do
                      recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid gold fringe
                      on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan stupid silly.
                      The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed. Simply
                      breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into prison. I'm
                      tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We tried it in 1970
                      when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped would gather
                      enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the voters. One of the
                      writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was Oliver Ray Price
                      (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality of this
                      petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.



                      For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of California and the
                      people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax system was fine.
                      HHHH

                      You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join his
                      organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                      but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                      work to change the law.



                      Sandy



                      -----Original Message-----
                      From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                      [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                      Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:09 AM
                      To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                      Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                      Sandy,

                      I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn't his family
                      threatened the next time around or something and he backed away from the
                      race?

                      I think Badnarik believes that the IRS violates the constitution and that's
                      what makes it illegal. I have some docs that support this belief and will
                      try to put my hands on them and forward them.

                      I think the LP needs a different candidate (other than Badnarik) in order to
                      become pliable. Just my personal opinion.



                      ---- Original Message -----
                      From: Sandra Price
                      To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                      Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:26 AM
                      Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                      Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the
                      many
                      issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement.
                      Their
                      candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression they want the
                      government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael Badnarik on
                      several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
                      Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be interpreted and
                      amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group of men who
                      believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a part of
                      the
                      laws of America for many years under the authority of the House and
                      Senate.




                      The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done through the
                      Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be dealing with
                      many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to be
                      declared
                      criminals.



                      I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the accepted
                      rules
                      of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on removing
                      every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up under the Bush
                      Administration and have shown themselves incapable of determining what is
                      legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be designed and run
                      by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control over our
                      lives and will eliminate our state rights.



                      I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over the
                      authority
                      of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S. Constitution. I do not
                      want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate of
                      Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American family has
                      the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this choice
                      taken
                      away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a choice for
                      the
                      mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.

                      HHHH



                      There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways of
                      changing
                      what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find wrong and
                      will
                      end up supporting chaos.



                      Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our elections
                      in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have fallen
                      overboard
                      in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through the crap
                      the
                      current parties are selling at this time.



                      I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they too are
                      floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but not the way
                      they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.



                      Sandy Pricee has



                      _____



                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                      Yahoo! Groups Links










                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                      _____

                      YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                      * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                      <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                      * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                      arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                      <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                      * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                      <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                      _____



                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                      Yahoo! Groups Links








                      [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                    • Sandra Price
                      I was warning you to stay away from this group who is promoting what you believe to be true. Free speech is no longer legal, not now! Believe what you want
                      Message 10 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                        I was warning you to stay away from this group who is promoting what you
                        believe to be true. Free speech is no longer legal, not now! Believe what
                        you want but have a lawyer ready. This is a big deal and many in the LP
                        will be implicated.



                        Some day if we ever can locate a congress with balls, we might be able to
                        pull off this crap about the IRS being outside the law.



                        Sandy

                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                        [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                        Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:59 AM
                        To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                        Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join
                        his
                        organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                        but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                        work to change the law."

                        Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply stated that
                        I have some documents and information that support the premise that the IRS
                        is indeed in violation of the Constitution.

                        As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in different ways.
                        Just because someone believes that the IRS is unconstitutional does not make
                        them a criminal and does not mean they are headed for the pokey. Free
                        speech is still legal...well at least for today...LOL

                        Great points however...thanks for sharing them.


                        ----- Original Message -----
                        From: Sandra Price
                        To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                        Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                        Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                        Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working legitimately
                        and
                        honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing Michael
                        Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an inside source
                        on
                        this information and will share it with you when the last two are in
                        prison.
                        Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done time for
                        extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any signs up
                        with
                        these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the near future.
                        Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very close to
                        coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop believing in the
                        tooth fairy.



                        I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government. I do
                        recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid gold
                        fringe
                        on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan stupid
                        silly.
                        The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed. Simply
                        breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into prison. I'm
                        tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We tried it in
                        1970
                        when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped would gather
                        enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the voters. One of
                        the
                        writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was Oliver Ray
                        Price
                        (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality of this
                        petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.



                        For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of California and
                        the
                        people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax system was
                        fine.
                        HHHH

                        You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join his
                        organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                        but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                        work to change the law.



                        Sandy



                        -----Original Message-----
                        From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                        [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                        Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:09 AM
                        To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                        Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                        Sandy,

                        I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn't his
                        family
                        threatened the next time around or something and he backed away from the
                        race?

                        I think Badnarik believes that the IRS violates the constitution and
                        that's
                        what makes it illegal. I have some docs that support this belief and will
                        try to put my hands on them and forward them.

                        I think the LP needs a different candidate (other than Badnarik) in order
                        to
                        become pliable. Just my personal opinion.



                        ---- Original Message -----
                        From: Sandra Price
                        To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                        Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:26 AM
                        Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                        Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the
                        many
                        issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement.
                        Their
                        candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression they want
                        the
                        government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael Badnarik on
                        several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
                        Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be interpreted
                        and
                        amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group of men
                        who
                        believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a part of
                        the
                        laws of America for many years under the authority of the House and
                        Senate.




                        The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done through
                        the
                        Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be dealing
                        with
                        many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to be
                        declared
                        criminals.



                        I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the accepted
                        rules
                        of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on removing
                        every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up under the
                        Bush
                        Administration and have shown themselves incapable of determining what
                        is
                        legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be designed and
                        run
                        by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control over our
                        lives and will eliminate our state rights.



                        I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over the
                        authority
                        of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S. Constitution. I do
                        not
                        want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate of
                        Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American family
                        has
                        the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this choice
                        taken
                        away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a choice for
                        the
                        mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.

                        HHHH



                        There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways of
                        changing
                        what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find wrong and
                        will
                        end up supporting chaos.



                        Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our
                        elections
                        in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have fallen
                        overboard
                        in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through the crap
                        the
                        current parties are selling at this time.



                        I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they too are
                        floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but not the
                        way
                        they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.



                        Sandy Pricee has



                        _____



                        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                        Yahoo! Groups Links










                        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                        _____

                        YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                        * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                        * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                        arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                        <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>



                        * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                        <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                        _____



                        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                        Yahoo! Groups Links








                        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                        SPONSORED LINKS


                        E
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=E+government&w1=E+government&w2=Governm
                        ent+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&w5=Gove
                        rnment+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=hBipR0hmaHRBWhoc949Xow>
                        government

                        Government
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=E+government&
                        w2=Government+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+wom
                        en&w5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=x08HqhIkgDQfcWV
                        fJx8BIg> procurement

                        Government
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=E+government&w2=G
                        overnment+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&w
                        5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=4An7abdoxVxJCCADxGE
                        11Q> leasing


                        Government
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=E+govern
                        ment&w2=Government+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+fo
                        r+women&w5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=NZ3lBUk-AR
                        ctXIJFZwwxQA> grants for women

                        Government
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=E+government&w2=Gov
                        ernment+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&w5=
                        Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=lT0SF7xRS325Hg8YKetxj
                        w> lease

                        Government
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=E+government&w2=
                        Government+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&
                        w5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=TJmcpxEiYC9WXJ2wWg
                        pJYQ> contract



                        _____

                        YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                        * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                        <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                        * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                        arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                        <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                        * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                        <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                        _____



                        [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                      • Denise Bensusan
                        Good points Sandy! Thanks ... From: Sandra Price To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:18 PM Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines]
                        Message 11 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                          Good points Sandy!

                          Thanks
                          ----- Original Message -----
                          From: Sandra Price
                          To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 1:18 PM
                          Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                          I was warning you to stay away from this group who is promoting what you
                          believe to be true. Free speech is no longer legal, not now! Believe what
                          you want but have a lawyer ready. This is a big deal and many in the LP
                          will be implicated.



                          Some day if we ever can locate a congress with balls, we might be able to
                          pull off this crap about the IRS being outside the law.



                          Sandy

                          -----Original Message-----
                          From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                          Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 11:59 AM
                          To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                          Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join
                          his
                          organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                          but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                          work to change the law."

                          Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply stated that
                          I have some documents and information that support the premise that the IRS
                          is indeed in violation of the Constitution.

                          As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in different ways.
                          Just because someone believes that the IRS is unconstitutional does not make
                          them a criminal and does not mean they are headed for the pokey. Free
                          speech is still legal...well at least for today...LOL

                          Great points however...thanks for sharing them.


                          ----- Original Message -----
                          From: Sandra Price
                          To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                          Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                          Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working legitimately
                          and
                          honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing Michael
                          Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an inside source
                          on
                          this information and will share it with you when the last two are in
                          prison.
                          Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done time for
                          extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any signs up
                          with
                          these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the near future.
                          Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very close to
                          coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop believing in the
                          tooth fairy.



                          I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government. I do
                          recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid gold
                          fringe
                          on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan stupid
                          silly.
                          The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed. Simply
                          breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into prison. I'm
                          tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We tried it in
                          1970
                          when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped would gather
                          enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the voters. One of
                          the
                          writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was Oliver Ray
                          Price
                          (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality of this
                          petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.



                          For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of California and
                          the
                          people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax system was
                          fine.
                          HHHH

                          You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join his
                          organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want, go ahead
                          but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another direction and
                          work to change the law.



                          Sandy



                          -----Original Message-----
                          From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                          Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 8:09 AM
                          To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                          Sandy,

                          I agree with you on Ross Perot and I DID vote fro him!!! Wasn't his
                          family
                          threatened the next time around or something and he backed away from the
                          race?

                          I think Badnarik believes that the IRS violates the constitution and
                          that's
                          what makes it illegal. I have some docs that support this belief and will
                          try to put my hands on them and forward them.

                          I think the LP needs a different candidate (other than Badnarik) in order
                          to
                          become pliable. Just my personal opinion.



                          ---- Original Message -----
                          From: Sandra Price
                          To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                          Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:26 AM
                          Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                          Derek, you are correct about the lack of interest within the LP for the
                          many
                          issues that were part of the early days of the Libertarian movement.
                          Their
                          candidates have no real desire to win and get the impression they want
                          the
                          government to fail so we can start all over. I met Michael Badnarik on
                          several occasions and was not impressed with his knowledge of the
                          Constitution. He has his own version of how it should be interpreted
                          and
                          amended and he is simply wrong. He is also a member of a group of men
                          who
                          believe the IRS is against the law. It is legal and has been a part of
                          the
                          laws of America for many years under the authority of the House and
                          Senate.




                          The only way to clean up the IRS is by legal legislation done through
                          the
                          Congress and until Badnarik recognizes this fact, he will be dealing
                          with
                          many criminals who have done time in prison and will continue to be
                          declared
                          criminals.



                          I will never support any candidate who refuses to play by the accepted
                          rules
                          of law. I am now an Independent voter and will concentrate on removing
                          every damn congressman running in 2006. They all folded up under the
                          Bush
                          Administration and have shown themselves incapable of determining what
                          is
                          legal and correct. These fools want a Police State to be designed and
                          run
                          by the White House. The Bush administration wants full control over our
                          lives and will eliminate our state rights.



                          I am not a Christian and will refuse to live by the Bible over the
                          authority
                          of our individual rights as are shown in the U.S. Constitution. I do
                          not
                          want the Bible introduced into our schools and being an advocate of
                          Evolution, feel it should be taught as a science. The American family
                          has
                          the choice of family size at this time and I resent having this choice
                          taken
                          away. I am not a proponent of abortion but it must remain a choice for
                          the
                          mother, father and clergy, not some asshole in the White House.

                          HHHH



                          There is a lot wrong in our government but there are legal ways of
                          changing
                          what we find offensive. The LP simply ignores what they find wrong and
                          will
                          end up supporting chaos.



                          Many of us are searching for a third party candidate for all our
                          elections
                          in 2006 and 2008 because the Republicans and Democrats have fallen
                          overboard
                          in their leadership. We need another Ross Perot to cut through the crap
                          the
                          current parties are selling at this time.



                          I have followed the FSP since the day it was introduced and they too are
                          floundering around without a purpose. I love the concept but not the
                          way
                          they are wandering all over the place trying to find an agenda.



                          Sandy Pricee has



                          _____



                          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                          Yahoo! Groups Links










                          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                          _____

                          YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                          * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                          * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                          arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                          <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>



                          * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                          <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                          _____



                          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                          Yahoo! Groups Links








                          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                          SPONSORED LINKS


                          E
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=E+government&w1=E+government&w2=Governm
                          ent+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&w5=Gove
                          rnment+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=hBipR0hmaHRBWhoc949Xow>
                          government

                          Government
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+procurement&w1=E+government&
                          w2=Government+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+wom
                          en&w5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=x08HqhIkgDQfcWV
                          fJx8BIg> procurement

                          Government
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+leasing&w1=E+government&w2=G
                          overnment+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&w
                          5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=4An7abdoxVxJCCADxGE
                          11Q> leasing


                          Government
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+grants+for+women&w1=E+govern
                          ment&w2=Government+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+fo
                          r+women&w5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=NZ3lBUk-AR
                          ctXIJFZwwxQA> grants for women

                          Government
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+lease&w1=E+government&w2=Gov
                          ernment+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&w5=
                          Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=lT0SF7xRS325Hg8YKetxj
                          w> lease

                          Government
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Government+contract&w1=E+government&w2=
                          Government+procurement&w3=Government+leasing&w4=Government+grants+for+women&
                          w5=Government+lease&w6=Government+contract&c=6&s=150&.sig=TJmcpxEiYC9WXJ2wWg
                          pJYQ> contract



                          _____

                          YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                          * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                          <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                          * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                          arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                          <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                          * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                          <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                          _____



                          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                          Yahoo! Groups Links









                          [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                        • Derek
                          Just the belief that the IRS and the income tax is unconstitutional will NOT get you put into prison. Not paying your taxes will. Many people in this country
                          Message 12 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                            Just the belief that the IRS and the income tax is unconstitutional
                            will NOT get you put into prison. Not paying your taxes will. Many
                            people in this country believe that the IRS is unconstitutional and
                            wrong, etc., but still they grudgingly pay their taxes because they
                            know that they still have to, and they do not want to go to jail.
                            The only ones I have seen go to jail are the ones that join these
                            full fledged "tax protestor" groups and quit paying taxes.

                            Big difference between believing it ain't right and not paying.

                            Derek



                            --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Denise Bensusan"
                            <denise.bensusan@f...> wrote:
                            >
                            > Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get
                            you to join his
                            > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                            go ahead
                            > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                            direction and
                            > work to change the law."
                            >
                            > Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply
                            stated that I have some documents and information that support the
                            premise that the IRS is indeed in violation of the Constitution.
                            >
                            > As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in
                            different ways. Just because someone believes that the IRS is
                            unconstitutional does not make them a criminal and does not mean
                            they are headed for the pokey. Free speech is still legal...well at
                            least for today...LOL
                            >
                            > Great points however...thanks for sharing them.
                            >
                            >
                            > ----- Original Message -----
                            > From: Sandra Price
                            > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                            > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                            > Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New
                            Direction
                            >
                            >
                            > Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working
                            legitimately and
                            > honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing
                            Michael
                            > Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an
                            inside source on
                            > this information and will share it with you when the last two
                            are in prison.
                            > Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done
                            time for
                            > extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any
                            signs up with
                            > these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the
                            near future.
                            > Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very
                            close to
                            > coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop
                            believing in the
                            > tooth fairy.
                            >
                            >
                            >
                            > I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government.
                            I do
                            > recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid
                            gold fringe
                            > on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan
                            stupid silly.
                            > The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed.
                            Simply
                            > breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into
                            prison. I'm
                            > tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We
                            tried it in 1970
                            > when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped
                            would gather
                            > enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the
                            voters. One of the
                            > writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was
                            Oliver Ray Price
                            > (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality
                            of this
                            > petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.
                            >
                            >
                            >
                            > For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of
                            California and the
                            > people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax
                            system was fine.
                            > HHHH
                            >
                            > You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join
                            his
                            > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                            go ahead
                            > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                            direction and
                            > work to change the law.
                            >
                            >
                            >
                            > Sandy
                          • Derek
                            No, I do not. And I don t know if it would even be worth it to do it at my college. It is extremely small. I attend an acupuncture college here in AZ, and
                            Message 13 of 21 , Jan 23, 2006
                              No, I do not. And I don't know if it would even be worth it to do it
                              at my college. It is extremely small. I attend an acupuncture
                              college here in AZ, and there are only about a dozen students in each
                              of the 3 classes, so we only have around 36 students. Assuming that
                              only 1/4 or so of them would be interested in becoming Libertarians,
                              or already are Libertarians, I don't know if it is worth starting. It
                              is such a small, specialty school, and it is an accelerated program,
                              we barely have time for anything but studies.

                              I know I don't have time to run a club. However, of the 3 guys in my
                              class, ALL 3 of us do have Libertarian beliefs. We may all even be
                              registered as Libertarians. I am a registered Lib but I am not sure
                              about the other 2 guys.

                              I used to attend a much larger community college, which probably would
                              have been a better place to start a Libertarian organization. I
                              thought about doing it then, but I was taking so many classes so I
                              could get into Acupuncture school that I didn't have time to do it
                              then either.

                              But I agree, the colleges are great places to recruit. Young minds
                              are still usually open, and at a young age, many people have an anti-
                              establishment mindset, whereas when people get older, they tend to
                              lean much more toward the establishment and status quo.

                              If I had to guess what the political leanings of most of my classmates
                              were, I would say most either probably don't care or are probably
                              liberals or independents. Other than me and one other guy, I don't
                              think any of my other classmates are politically active at all.

                              How hard is it to start a Libertarian college organization? What do
                              you have to do? I know 3 of us are Libertarians. Is that enough to
                              make it worth it?

                              Derek



                              --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Denise Bensusan"
                              <denise.bensusan@f...> wrote:
                              >
                              > Derek,
                              >
                              > Do you have an organized activist group at your college???
                              >
                              >
                              > Denise
                            • Sandra Price
                              You are quite right. I do not recommend even signing up with these groups if you ever want or need a government clearance. Sandy ... From:
                              Message 14 of 21 , Jan 24, 2006
                                You are quite right. I do not recommend even signing up with these groups
                                if you ever want or need a government clearance.



                                Sandy



                                -----Original Message-----
                                From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Derek
                                Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:43 PM
                                To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                                Just the belief that the IRS and the income tax is unconstitutional
                                will NOT get you put into prison. Not paying your taxes will. Many
                                people in this country believe that the IRS is unconstitutional and
                                wrong, etc., but still they grudgingly pay their taxes because they
                                know that they still have to, and they do not want to go to jail.
                                The only ones I have seen go to jail are the ones that join these
                                full fledged "tax protestor" groups and quit paying taxes.

                                Big difference between believing it ain't right and not paying.

                                Derek



                                --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Denise Bensusan"
                                <denise.bensusan@f...> wrote:
                                >
                                > Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get
                                you to join his
                                > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                                go ahead
                                > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                                direction and
                                > work to change the law."
                                >
                                > Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply
                                stated that I have some documents and information that support the
                                premise that the IRS is indeed in violation of the Constitution.
                                >
                                > As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in
                                different ways. Just because someone believes that the IRS is
                                unconstitutional does not make them a criminal and does not mean
                                they are headed for the pokey. Free speech is still legal...well at
                                least for today...LOL
                                >
                                > Great points however...thanks for sharing them.
                                >
                                >
                                > ----- Original Message -----
                                > From: Sandra Price
                                > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                                > Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New
                                Direction
                                >
                                >
                                > Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working
                                legitimately and
                                > honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing
                                Michael
                                > Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an
                                inside source on
                                > this information and will share it with you when the last two
                                are in prison.
                                > Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done
                                time for
                                > extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any
                                signs up with
                                > these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the
                                near future.
                                > Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very
                                close to
                                > coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop
                                believing in the
                                > tooth fairy.
                                >
                                >
                                >
                                > I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government.
                                I do
                                > recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid
                                gold fringe
                                > on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan
                                stupid silly.
                                > The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed.
                                Simply
                                > breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into
                                prison. I'm
                                > tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We
                                tried it in 1970
                                > when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped
                                would gather
                                > enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the
                                voters. One of the
                                > writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was
                                Oliver Ray Price
                                > (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality
                                of this
                                > petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.
                                >
                                >
                                >
                                > For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of
                                California and the
                                > people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax
                                system was fine.
                                > HHHH
                                >
                                > You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join
                                his
                                > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                                go ahead
                                > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                                direction and
                                > work to change the law.
                                >
                                >
                                >
                                > Sandy







                                _____

                                YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                                * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                                <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                                * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                                * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                                <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                                _____



                                [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                              • Denise Bensusan
                                Sandy, Have you been to the FSP site? http://www.freestateproject.org/ It appears to me that the FSP is oriented toward Libertarianism and does support
                                Message 15 of 21 , Jan 24, 2006
                                  Sandy,

                                  Have you been to the FSP site?

                                  http://www.freestateproject.org/

                                  It appears to me that the FSP is oriented toward Libertarianism and does support Libertarian candidates. This group is an FSP group....so I am wondering about your position concerning Libertarianism???

                                  Mo offense intended of course....

                                  ----- Original Message -----
                                  From: Sandra Price
                                  To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                  Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:03 AM
                                  Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                                  You are quite right. I do not recommend even signing up with these groups
                                  if you ever want or need a government clearance.



                                  Sandy



                                  -----Original Message-----
                                  From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                  [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Derek
                                  Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:43 PM
                                  To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                  Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                                  Just the belief that the IRS and the income tax is unconstitutional
                                  will NOT get you put into prison. Not paying your taxes will. Many
                                  people in this country believe that the IRS is unconstitutional and
                                  wrong, etc., but still they grudgingly pay their taxes because they
                                  know that they still have to, and they do not want to go to jail.
                                  The only ones I have seen go to jail are the ones that join these
                                  full fledged "tax protestor" groups and quit paying taxes.

                                  Big difference between believing it ain't right and not paying.

                                  Derek



                                  --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Denise Bensusan"
                                  <denise.bensusan@f...> wrote:
                                  >
                                  > Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get
                                  you to join his
                                  > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                                  go ahead
                                  > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                                  direction and
                                  > work to change the law."
                                  >
                                  > Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply
                                  stated that I have some documents and information that support the
                                  premise that the IRS is indeed in violation of the Constitution.
                                  >
                                  > As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in
                                  different ways. Just because someone believes that the IRS is
                                  unconstitutional does not make them a criminal and does not mean
                                  they are headed for the pokey. Free speech is still legal...well at
                                  least for today...LOL
                                  >
                                  > Great points however...thanks for sharing them.
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > ----- Original Message -----
                                  > From: Sandra Price
                                  > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                  > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                                  > Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New
                                  Direction
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working
                                  legitimately and
                                  > honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing
                                  Michael
                                  > Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an
                                  inside source on
                                  > this information and will share it with you when the last two
                                  are in prison.
                                  > Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done
                                  time for
                                  > extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any
                                  signs up with
                                  > these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the
                                  near future.
                                  > Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very
                                  close to
                                  > coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop
                                  believing in the
                                  > tooth fairy.
                                  >
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government.
                                  I do
                                  > recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid
                                  gold fringe
                                  > on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan
                                  stupid silly.
                                  > The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed.
                                  Simply
                                  > breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into
                                  prison. I'm
                                  > tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We
                                  tried it in 1970
                                  > when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped
                                  would gather
                                  > enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the
                                  voters. One of the
                                  > writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was
                                  Oliver Ray Price
                                  > (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality
                                  of this
                                  > petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.
                                  >
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of
                                  California and the
                                  > people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax
                                  system was fine.
                                  > HHHH
                                  >
                                  > You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join
                                  his
                                  > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                                  go ahead
                                  > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                                  direction and
                                  > work to change the law.
                                  >
                                  >
                                  >
                                  > Sandy







                                  _____

                                  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                                  * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                                  <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                                  * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                  arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                  <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                                  * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                                  <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                                  _____



                                  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                                  Yahoo! Groups Links










                                  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                • Sandra Price
                                  Not for a couple of years. What I got involved in was the LP Phoenix group, I was told there are two LP groups in Arizona and I was not impressed with the one
                                  Message 16 of 21 , Jan 24, 2006
                                    Not for a couple of years. What I got involved in was the LP Phoenix group,
                                    I was told there are two LP groups in Arizona and I was not impressed with
                                    the one that ran the Arizona primary where Badnarik too the leadership. I
                                    am interested in getting my freedoms back and would rather not trade them
                                    for anything. If every member of the LP had voted for their candidates,
                                    there would have been a greater turnout in 2004. They are not serious! So
                                    I will go with the Independents. I have a doctor's appointment and will
                                    check the FSP later on.



                                    Sandy



                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                    [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Denise Bensusan
                                    Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 6:22 AM
                                    To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                    Subject: Re: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                                    Sandy,

                                    Have you been to the FSP site?

                                    http://www.freestateproject.org/

                                    It appears to me that the FSP is oriented toward Libertarianism and does
                                    support Libertarian candidates. This group is an FSP group....so I am
                                    wondering about your position concerning Libertarianism???

                                    Mo offense intended of course....

                                    ----- Original Message -----
                                    From: Sandra Price
                                    To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                    Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:03 AM
                                    Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction


                                    You are quite right. I do not recommend even signing up with these groups
                                    if you ever want or need a government clearance.



                                    Sandy



                                    -----Original Message-----
                                    From: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                    [mailto:arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Derek
                                    Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 5:43 PM
                                    To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                    Subject: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New Direction



                                    Just the belief that the IRS and the income tax is unconstitutional
                                    will NOT get you put into prison. Not paying your taxes will. Many
                                    people in this country believe that the IRS is unconstitutional and
                                    wrong, etc., but still they grudgingly pay their taxes because they
                                    know that they still have to, and they do not want to go to jail.
                                    The only ones I have seen go to jail are the ones that join these
                                    full fledged "tax protestor" groups and quit paying taxes.

                                    Big difference between believing it ain't right and not paying.

                                    Derek



                                    --- In arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com, "Denise Bensusan"
                                    <denise.bensusan@f...> wrote:
                                    >
                                    > Sandy said: "You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get
                                    you to join his
                                    > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                                    go ahead
                                    > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                                    direction and
                                    > work to change the law."
                                    >
                                    > Just to clarify...I have not been taken in by ANYONE! I simply
                                    stated that I have some documents and information that support the
                                    premise that the IRS is indeed in violation of the Constitution.
                                    >
                                    > As with everything.....an individual can interpret issues in
                                    different ways. Just because someone believes that the IRS is
                                    unconstitutional does not make them a criminal and does not mean
                                    they are headed for the pokey. Free speech is still legal...well at
                                    least for today...LOL
                                    >
                                    > Great points however...thanks for sharing them.
                                    >
                                    >
                                    > ----- Original Message -----
                                    > From: Sandra Price
                                    > To: arizonaporcupines@yahoogroups.com
                                    > Sent: Monday, January 23, 2006 9:59 AM
                                    > Subject: RE: [arizonaporcupines] Re: Searching for a New
                                    Direction
                                    >
                                    >
                                    > Denise. Believe me when I tell you that the IRS is working
                                    legitimately and
                                    > honestly within the Constitution. The men who are influencing
                                    Michael
                                    > Badnarik will soon see years of federal prison. I have an
                                    inside source on
                                    > this information and will share it with you when the last two
                                    are in prison.
                                    > Badnarik is very aware of his association with men who have done
                                    time for
                                    > extortion and he just walks away from the whole thing. If any
                                    signs up with
                                    > these men, you will have a potential criminal problem in the
                                    near future.
                                    > Why take a chance? Sign nothing on this subject!!! It is very
                                    close to
                                    > coming to a halt. I have warned many LP members to stop
                                    believing in the
                                    > tooth fairy.
                                    >
                                    >
                                    >
                                    > I despise the IRS and I do not work for the federal government.
                                    I do
                                    > recognize that sitting around spreading rumors that some stupid
                                    gold fringe
                                    > on our flag indicates a problem within the courts is just plan
                                    stupid silly.
                                    > The IRS is legal but it doesn't mean the laws can't be changed.
                                    Simply
                                    > breaking the law as a disgruntled American will get you into
                                    prison. I'm
                                    > tired of warning you people. Change the law legally!!! We
                                    tried it in 1970
                                    > when we formed the Liberty Amendment petition that we hoped
                                    would gather
                                    > enough signatures to put the whole IRS system before the
                                    voters. One of the
                                    > writers of this petition was Harry Browne and the other was
                                    Oliver Ray Price
                                    > (my husband) and we had a dozen attorneys go over the legality
                                    of this
                                    > petition and it was written and rewritten a dozen times.
                                    >
                                    >
                                    >
                                    > For 6 months we took this petition all over the state of
                                    California and the
                                    > people were disinterested in the action and thought the tax
                                    system was fine.
                                    > HHHH
                                    >
                                    > You've been taken in by a convicted criminal to get you to join
                                    his
                                    > organization and in breaking the law. If that is what you want,
                                    go ahead
                                    > but if you want to stay out of the pokey you will go another
                                    direction and
                                    > work to change the law.
                                    >
                                    >
                                    >
                                    > Sandy







                                    _____

                                    YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                                    * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                                    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                                    * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                    arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                    <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>



                                    * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                                    <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                                    _____



                                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                                    Yahoo! Groups Links










                                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




                                    _____

                                    YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



                                    * Visit your group "arizonaporcupines
                                    <http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arizonaporcupines> " on the web.


                                    * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
                                    arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
                                    <mailto:arizonaporcupines-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>


                                    * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
                                    <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> Terms of Service.



                                    _____



                                    [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
                                  Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.