Welcome to Yahoo Groups.

There is nothing more naive than the darwiniste hypothesis of natural selection. Natural selection does not exist. Seeing the logic of it it does not allow anything for the origin of a species nore for its life-cycle nor for that matter the different forms

Right! İ am not so sure to be able to Reawaken metaphysics.. İt needs Resurection.. for it is dead and well buried... Unless .. you demand fondamental real questions (and hope are not still dead) like: How come there is a planet that rotates on its axis

Dear Timothy 'God' Please look up fnalities...Aristotle 4causes on net Souran --- physisvnomos a écrit : > Mr. Mardini, > > Forgive me, Soran, but your comments are of interest > and I am plagued > by ignorance; what is meant by the term "external

Mr. Kennelly No personal jest is made. Far from this... Ý consider only ideas and concepts. What worries me a lot are assumptions of proofs and evidences for or against the existance of an "external finality".. We simply have no empiric knowledge.. Unless

Can you stop please using empty terminology Time is simply unknown (einstein:a ray of matter?) utter words.... Matter is even less unknown Until when we pretend to knowledge... Souran --- chungchi hsu a écrit : > Dear Stephen: > > This is called

Steve Utter words void of meaning and reference... Please wake up... Souran --- Stephen Learnard a écrit : > Looking at the nature of time it has been recently > defined as bundles of energy that are attached to an > observable ( as a result of the energy

Absolute Rubbish, Give me one , one single evidence only even a sign, an indice, anything... Souran --- John Barone a écrit : > Mr Kennelly, I believe that what you say certainly a > valid theory easily reconcilable to Aristotelian > thought. I don't know

Lance Lamda, yes. The whole metaphysics as well as the physics are based on the notion that from the "phenomenon of mouvement" Arsito leaps , by a miracle, to a God, perfect, immovable and eternal as well as good !!!!!???? We think we are reading the Torah

I have some difficulty to understand Aristotle's point of view of the relationship between the mouvement and the sudden, unexpected appearance of a God!! Can you help bridge the gap? Souran