Re: APRS-IS Enabled & RF Port
- --- In email@example.com, "g4ilo" <julian.g4ilo@...> wrote:
>By supporting APRS-IS instead of something like this:
> It's not a burden to the network. In fact the receiving of beacons is an important function of APRS in allowing the network to know where you are so it can know what other stations are local to you and therefore likely to be of interest. Therefore it makes no sense in the context of what APRS-IS is supposed to do to inhibit the sending of some beacons to the network.
2010-09-25 13:26:29 CEST: SQ3NQE-9>APWM04,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1,qAO,SR3WXA:=5225.82N/01650.70E>
2010-09-25 13:30:44 CEST: SQ3NQE-9>APWM04,SR3DPN,WIDE1*,WIDE2-1,qAO,SR3WXA:=5226.25N/01645.84E>
2010-09-25 13:31:50 CEST: SQ3NQE-9>APWM04,WIDE1-1,WIDE2-1,qAO,SR3WXA:=5226.50N/01645.34E>
2010-09-24 11:55:10 CEST: SQ3NQE-9>APWM04,TCPIP*,qAC,T2TURKIYE:=5203.78N/01708.95E>
2010-09-24 11:56:37 CEST: SQ3NQE-9>APWM04,TCPIP*,qAC,T2TURKIYE:=5203.82N/01710.48E>
2010-09-24 11:57:38 CEST: SQ3NQE-9>APWM04,TCPIP*,qAC,T2TURKIYE:=5203.46N/01711.42E>
There information on the APRS network operation. Therefore, as I enter the password -1. But it does not work then my i-Gate. I can accept it :D. And I have both stations suitable for APRS-IS.
> If you want, for your own reasons, to do this, then that is fine, but don't expect developers of APRS software to cater for your rather eccentric requirement.Sorry, it was just a proposal for a new feature. In Poland, the APRS network is not 100% developed. There are so-called "white spots". That is why I wanted to help by sending a beacon APRS-IS.