Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [aprsisce] (Dev: 2012/08/01 08:09)

Expand Messages
  • Lynn W Deffenbaugh (Mr)
    ... And the packet itself clarifies that to an MT-TT4. Still in development and under test. News and results once we ve worked out a few kinks. Lynn (D) -
    Message 1 of 15 , Aug 1, 2012
    • 0 Attachment
      On 8/1/2012 6:04 PM, Lee D Bengston wrote:

      Ok, Dev: 2012/08/01 08:09 says it's a Tiny Trak 4.  :-)

      And the packet itself clarifies that to an MT-TT4.  Still in development and under test.  News and results once we've worked out a few kinks.

      Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

      PS.  It's got promise, IMHO, for a certain classification of uses.


      Lee - K5DAT


    • Randy Love
      But I thought you implemented base-91 compressed packets, which would still allow you to use the TOCALL for subnets and device id....
      Message 2 of 15 , Aug 1, 2012
      • 0 Attachment

        But I thought you implemented base-91 compressed packets, which would still allow you to use the TOCALL for subnets and device id....

        On Aug 1, 2012 6:21 PM, "Lynn W Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <kj4erj@...> wrote:
         

        On 8/1/2012 6:04 PM, Lee D Bengston wrote:

        Ok, Dev: 2012/08/01 08:09 says it's a Tiny Trak 4.  :-)

        And the packet itself clarifies that to an MT-TT4.  Still in development and under test.  News and results once we've worked out a few kinks.

        Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

        PS.  It's got promise, IMHO, for a certain classification of uses.


        Lee - K5DAT


      • Lynn W Deffenbaugh (Mr)
        KJ4ERJ-4 is a TT4-based hardware device. I m only monitoring it with APRSIS32 as KJ4ERJ-2. Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
        Message 3 of 15 , Aug 1, 2012
        • 0 Attachment
          KJ4ERJ-4 is a TT4-based hardware device.  I'm only monitoring it with APRSIS32 as KJ4ERJ-2.

          Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

          On 8/1/2012 10:27 PM, Randy Love wrote:

          But I thought you implemented base-91 compressed packets, which would still allow you to use the TOCALL for subnets and device id....

          On Aug 1, 2012 6:21 PM, "Lynn W Deffenbaugh (Mr)" <kj4erj@...> wrote:
           

          On 8/1/2012 6:04 PM, Lee D Bengston wrote:

          Ok, Dev:2012/08/01 08:09 says it's a Tiny Trak 4.  :-)

          And the packet itself clarifies that to an MT-TT4.  Still in development and under test.  News and results once we've worked out a few kinks.

          Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32

          PS.  It's got promise, IMHO, for a certain classification of uses.


          Lee- K5DAT



        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.