Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Acks over RF - Fixed?

Expand Messages
  • g4ilo
    Fixed (for general info, as you already know.) Good job you had a few minutes between hike and wedding! :) Julian, G4ILO
    Message 1 of 10 , Jun 12, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Fixed (for general info, as you already know.)

      Good job you had a few minutes between hike and wedding! :)

      Julian, G4ILO

      --- In aprsisce@yahoogroups.com, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh" <kj4erj@...> wrote:
      >
      > Julian,
      >
      > I just pushed out a new development version that attempts to be smarter
      > about sending out acks. It now follows the same logic at choosing an
      > outbound port that sending an original message does. Namely:
      >
      > 1) If the station is known and has NOT been heard on RF, send it -IS only.
      > 2) Countermand the -IS only if APRS-IS is not enabled
      >
      > In the new port design, I can't really tell if the -IS is actually
      > connected or not, so just having it enabled may cause the ack to not go
      > out over RF, but then again, if the -IS isn't connected and a message
      > was heard, it must have come in via RF, right?
      >
      > Please give it a quick test at your next opportunity and let me know if
      > I've actually quieted the RF channel for -IS acks.
      >
      > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
      >
      >
      > g4ilo wrote:
      > > I was just having a conversation with Colin via APRS messaging. I was using the PC, he was on his smartphone and then his PC. No RF from his side.
      > >
      > > I noticed the 2m TX going every time Colin sent a message to me. I have AGWMonitor running as well to see the actual traffic over RF and I see that for every message sent to me over the internet, an ack goes out over RF. I am not receiving any RF at all not even via another route so the acks cannot be in response to anything else.
      > >
      > > Is it supposed to do that?
      > >
      > > Julian, G4ILO
      > >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.