2941Re: [aprsisce] Re: Object as message
- Sep 1, 2010Yes (non-unique) and No (eavesdropping).
If I had been in the same RF area as you when the message was IGated
from -IS to RF, my APRSISCE/32 would have heard it regardless and put it
on my map. Item-As-Message are processed and added to the map if they
come in via any port. What made me see your message is my u/APWW*/APWM*
filter that causes all APRSISCE/32-generated traffic to come from
APRS-IS. That gave me the message which cause the Item-As-Message to be
parsed and picked up. IAS has nothing to do with message reception, I
pull it straight out of my parser.
Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ
Fred Hillhouse wrote:
> Sometime ago, I wish I could remember when and the details, I had
> trouble with an object that had the same name as an object already in
> use. When I finally changed the name (because I realized someone was
> using it) the object worked as planned. Is this the non-unique issue
> you see?
> Also, did you see my object because you were eavesdropping?
> *From:* firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Lynn W. Deffenbaugh
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 01, 2010 17:16
> *To:* firstname.lastname@example.org
> *Subject:* Re: [aprsisce] Re: Object as message
> I see three of the -P objects now. One from KJ4ERJ-AL, one from WOTA,
> and one from N7FMH-AP. Yes, APRSISCE/32 considers objects of the same
> name from different stations to be different objects currently.
> This is
> done to protect myself from tracking down "bugs" that are actually
> dualling non-unique object names. Eventually I'll get
> spec-compliant in
> this area, somehow...
> Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
> PS. If you included the end of line delimiter in your copy operation,
> the paste will act as if you hit enter.
> Fred Hillhouse wrote:
> > Hmm, I cut and pasted one of the line into my message box to my
> > instance and as soon as it pasted it, it was sent!
> > Does anyone see the object as being from me?
> > Fred
> > ----------------------------------------------------------
> > *From:* email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org <mailto:aprsisce%40yahoogroups.com>]
> > *On Behalf Of *Lynn W. Deffenbaugh
> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 01, 2010 16:45
> > *To:* email@example.com <mailto:aprsisce%40yahoogroups.com>
> > *Subject:* Re: [aprsisce] Re: Object as message
> > APRS coordinates are ddmm.mmXTdddmm.mmYS where X is N or S, Y is E
> > or W,
> > T is the table or overlay, and S is the symbol. Your two bad
> ones had
> > dddmm.mmm for the E/W. They should work better as:
> > )G4ILO-P!5439.29N/00314.96WrSale Fell 145.550 FM
> > )G4ILO-Q!5439.03N/00308.82WrSkiddaw 145.550 FM
> > This'll be really easy once I add the capability to send any of your
> > configured objects to any callsign as an Item-As-Message. The
> > advantage
> > of this approach is that you can "push" objects out to RF stations
> > through remote bi-directional IGates, provided that the receiving
> > station is considered to be "recently" "local".
> > Lynn (D) - KJ4ERJ - Author of APRSISCE for Windows Mobile and Win32
> > g4ilo wrote:
> > > Thanks, Lynn. If you get a moment, could you take a look at the
> > messages to G4ILO on aprs.fi and see if you can see anything wrong
> > with the second and subsequent objects? The first one appeared but
> > was out in the sea due to a longitude conversion error. I fixed
> > that and tried to change the icon to an antenna, also played with
> > what text I can fit in the message, but none of the others
> > appeared as objects although they were received as sent. I'm
> > wondering if it has something to do with the name being the same
> > as the first one sent, but it's probably just something dumb that
> > I did.
> > >
> > > Julian, G4ILO
> > >
> > > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org
> > <mailto:aprsisce%40yahoogroups.com>, "Lynn W. Deffenbaugh"
> > <kj4erj@...> wrote:
> > >
> > >> http://www.aprs.org/aprs12/item-in-msg.txt
> > >>
> > >> g4ilo wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Where is the format for sending an object in a message
> > documented? Google isn't being very friendly.
> > >>>
> > >>> Julian, G4ILO
> > >>>
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>