RE: [antlr-interest] suggestions for 2.7.2
>Only if you subclass the _generated_ lexer.
> > * it would be nice if antlr would generate a _nextToken() function
> > instead of nextToken(). The default implementation of
> nextToken() would
> > just call _nextToken(), but I would have the possibility of
> > the nextToken() function.
> super.nextToken() should work for ya.