The "newelectrogravity group" have not transmit my last post whitch was an answer to your last post question, so I transmit you this post, witch is a copy of a post I have made on the electrohydrodynamics yahoo group

Yes, the A-field vector extend beyond the condutor material, it is the potential of B, like U voltage is the potential of E Field, with the relation E=Gradient(U).

A vector is the potential of B with the relation B=curl(A) so depending initial condition we have several possibility for the Vector potential of B = A + Grad(Q), because curl( A + Grad(Q) ) = curl (A), in this formula Q have the dimension of a charge (probably "magnetic charge"). For me, i think that this "magnetic charge" is in relation with Gravity, i have not already demonstrated that, but i am working on Maxwell equation, because they are not complete. I think that the nature of the gravity is an Electromagnetic nature.

When we have B=0 by opposition of 2 B fields, the Energy IS NOT NUL so A CANNOT be nul, so A need to be equal to Grad(Q).

Laurent DAMOIS

2010/5/16 Edward E

Wait a minute Laurent!

I have a question to ask you before I go away to study.

Concerning the so called A-field vector;

Does the A-field vector extend beyond the condutor material

i.e, is it an intrinsic component of the magnetic field.?

Regards ,

Edward. E

"Edward E" <edwardemsley@...> wrote:>

Laurent DAMOIS <laurent.damois@> wrote:

>

>

>

> Thanks for the Wikipedia links.

> I shall go away a while and study these in more depth.

>

> >

E=0 in a capacitor because charge on the 2 plates create an E Field, but inside the capacitor, the dielectric polarisation create an opposite E Field

> > Yes A = B (cross product) dr , because B = Curl(A) witch is the definition

> > of A (potential vector of B). So A = current density x Area x Mu (Mu is

> > magnetic permeability of the material). Generaly A is parallel to the vector

> > intensity (same direction)

> > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_potential

> > See: "Nonuniqueness" paragraphe at

> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_potential

> > When we have B field = 0 with two B Field opposition we are in this case,

> > because magnetic energy do not equal 0, so A Field do not equal 0, so A

> > Field is a gradient, so we have creation of force because we have "Energy +

> > Gradient"

> > To have "Electromagnetic Free energy device" and "Electronagnetic perpetual

> > motion device", we need to be in this situation.

> > For a biwired (biwounded) coil with B=0, gradient could be:

> > - Gradient of shape (conical shape)

> > - Gradient of electric resistivity (2 differents material)

> > - Gradient of magnetic permeability (2 differents material)

> > The best know "Electronagnetic perpetual motion device" is the

> > supraconductor current, witch caracteristic is: B Field = 0 inside the

> > "device=wire".

> > See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meissner_effect

> >

> > This kind of device can be named: "Asymetric Magnetic Capacitor", because in

> > a asymetric electric capacitor we have "E=0 + Energy different of 0 +

> > Gradient" and in a "AMC" we have "B=0 + Energy different of 0 + Gradient"

FORCE = Gradient(Energy)

The Force created with an AMC is: Force = (I²/2)xGrad(Inductance), because Energy in coil = Inductance x (Intensity)²/2

The Force created with an AEC (Asymetric Electric Capacitor) is: Force = (U²/2)xGrad(Capacity), because Energy in capacitor = Capacity x (Intensity)²/2

You can notice that, this formula match with the result of the NASA experiment on asymetric capacitor,

- FORCE WORKS IN DC AND AC MODE because we have I² and U²

- FORCE DEPEND ONLY OF THE GRADIENT DIRECTION

In AEC the power will be very low, because Power = Intensity leakage x Voltage, so some few watts

In AMC the power can be "unlimited"> >

Re: [newelectrogravity] A-Vector Magic

> > Laurent DAMOIS

> >

> > 2010/5/14 Edward E <edwardemsley@>

> >

> > > Thank you Laurent,I think I get it.

> > >

> > > So the A-field vector is simply the area vector

> > > of the current density through a cross-section

> > > of conductor material such that

> > > A = Bdx [ wb/m ].?

> > >

> > > Laurent DAMOIS <laurent.damois@> wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Very easy, the 'A-vector field', is the current Field, the flow of

> > > electron

> > > > X Permeability of the material. The current taked as a vector is the

> > > > A-vector. Definition of A is Curl(A) = B = potential vector of B.

> > > > You can see with the maxwell equation, Curl(B)=Mu0 x J, with B=Curl(A) we

> > > > have Curl(Curl(A))=Mu0 x J, so if we make Surface integration = Flux of

> > > > Curl(Curl(A)) , we have

> > > > A = Mu0 X J x Aera, with J x Area = I (current, intensity), so A = Mu0 x

> > > I

> > > > Laurent

> > > >

> > > > 2010/5/12 Edward E <edwardemsley@>

> > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > >

> > > > > Can someone explain to me the 'A-vector field',

> > > > > I have not come across this before?

For the uninitiated, could you expand a little ?

thanks

David

On Tue, May 11th, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Laurent DAMOIS <laurent.damois@...>

wrote:

> I agree with you

>

> When we have (B+) + (B-) = 0 (two B Field in opposition = The secret

> for

> Free energy and Free Thrust)

> we have Curl( (A+) + (A-) ) = 0 so (A+) + (A-) = Grad(U) = Force =

> thrust =

> probably antigravitationnal Force

>

> Laurent DAMOIS

>

> 2010/5/10 jebayles2001 <jebayles2001@...>

>

> >

> >

> > May 10, 2010

> >

> > An electron passing through an A-vector field experiences a change

> in

> > momentum which is proven by the Aharanov-Bohm experiment. The

> units

> > are charge in coulombs times the A-vector in ((volts times seconds)

> divided

> > by distance in meters) equals momentum.

> >

> > It is established also that the A-vector is separate from the

> B-field that

> > engendered it. That is, when the B-field is totally sheilded from

> the

> > A-vector space, the A-Vector continues to exist and creates action

> on the

> > passing electron. Further, the A-vector cannot be shielded against

> which

> > makes it an ideal mechanism for gravitational action at a distance

> in the

> > quantum sense.

> >

> > Next, allowing for the momentum to be changed as a function of time

> creates

> > a force field apart from the B-field space. Therefore, force

> > by action at a distance in one spatial location is not transferred

> to

> > reaction force in another location in space. That is, the delta

> time B-field

> > space will not react to a corresponding force-field action in the

> A-vector

> > space.

> >

> > The conclusion to be drawn is that a force-field propulsion system

> > may be created by focusing the force field on a target within a

> craft

> > in the direction of desired motion and no counterpart reaction

> will

> > be generated.

> >

> > The action of the force-field via the A-vector is effectively

> > instantaneous. This suggests a method of superluminal

> communication.

> >

> > Finally, a force-impact weapon may also be created that cannot be

> shielded

> > against.

> >

> > Jerry E. Bayles

> > ElectrogravitationWorks