Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Conscious Evil ?Andrea

Expand Messages
  • Frank Thomas Smith
    ... I missed the original mail and thread so I don t know who sent it. But I read the Freedman article and am amazed and very disappointed that anyone on this
    Message 1 of 3 , Oct 1, 2004
    • 0 Attachment
      >
      >
      > and the Jews. It seems to me a very interesting antidote to people
      >> > who accuse others of Anti-Semitism. Andrea, I know you would like
      >> > this essay and would luv to hear your opinion on it. I looked it up
      >> > on the Internet, no joke, it was real. Here it is. It is a very
      >> > interesting ride and gives, not our occult spin, but rather the
      >> > refreshing Intellectual Soul spin on the events that hark back to
      >> > WWI, WWII and what we can gather about the approaching events of
      >> > WWIII. It has some real interesting insights.
      >> >
      >> > http://www.natall.com/free-speech/fs956b.html
      >> >
      >> > Andrea comments after reading.
      >> >
      > My 2cc about it.
      > The speech is one-sided, simplistic,full of falsehoods (In 1916 German was
      > not near to win the war, Italian Army was not at the collapse- Italy was
      > near to be defected in 1918 only-. In 1916 the worldwide military
      > situation
      > was of balance )and it is on the line of the "Zion's Protocols" , The
      > author's basic assumption is racist: : if someone was born "jew" he is
      > bound,, to behave in s certain way. An historian needs eveidences to gain
      > standpoints about matter like these, doesn't it?
      > A further prejudice is that "Jewry" is seen as a giant unique block with
      > no difference inside it.
      > Anyway there are inside the speech some good infos , able to add
      > something
      > to our knowledge about the Zionist issue. Sure we have to have gained
      > in
      > advance the capacity to make useful distinction between "Zionism" and
      > "Jewry:
      > So if we scratch the anti-semitic and rightwing powder over the surface
      > of the speech and we are able to read "Lodges" instead of the overall and
      > meaningless "Jews" (some jewish connection , or to say better, Zionist,
      > can
      > be, as it is, at last a part in the whole picture of the occult
      > conspiracies) and we put it in the Spiritual scientific conceptual
      > framework
      > we have gained a little "brick for the wall".
      > Nothing more, I believe.
      >
      > Andrea

      I missed the original mail and thread so I don't know who sent it. But I
      read the Freedman article and am amazed and very disappointed that anyone on
      this list would take such fascist anti-Semitic crap seriously and pass it
      on. Unless he/she was being ironic: a possibility, I hope so.
      Frank
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.