Re: Full Circle II
- Bradford, thank you so much for those kindly words. I had to bring in
my coworker as I was caught in a moment of surprise when he walked by
and peeked in my office. And I just smiled and couldn't stop. It's
exactly what I needed to hear from you. So thank you.
In regards to the sentient soul aspect of Christian Rosenkruetz I
shall look to your thoughts on this. You have always stated that she
was the sentient aspect of certain understandings. I have not read
the whole book yet as I just was stunned into silence when reading
the parts I posted yesterday as I was after having read your post to
me:) I shall check later on. I think it is a good book to consider
I have more questions of course but now it feels like what I had been
fighting for has been shown. It feels like the other questions don't
have as much juice behind them in my mind. Do you have a thought on
what it means when it was said that Magdalene was one of the 'limbs'?
And what about the comment on the 'earlier Lazarus'? Are we still
talking about a physical human being? If so, how can it be that
Magdalene was one of the limbs in this 'raising'? Do you have any
thoughts on this?
I have another part of the book that I want to share regarding the
phantom body/ressurection body regarding Anthroposophia as
an 'invisible human being'.
Anyhow, I could not have done it without you, Paulina, Danny, Harvey,
Catherine, Stephen and Jerry, and all my other on line friends
including Tarjei that is for sure. I have a lazy mind and a scary eye
that lends to me just working so hard to bring my will forward. It's
funny that it doesn't really mean anything to my friends other than I
found the Magdalenes importance to the whole, and to share it with my
new study group seems like it would not be appropriate, but here on
line where I have bared my soul it feels like home.
Thank you Bradford,