RE: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] bewildered critics
> Walden saying:Dottie
> "When I read Peter's articles, I find myself nodding
> and understanding what
> he is saying. I am looking objectively for a logical
> argument to counter
> what he has written. Seriously. When I read some
> other arguments
> countering his understanding of historical events
> (anthroposophic roots, in
> this case) I am usually left wondering if the writer
> is referring to Peter's
> piece or something entirely different. I appreciate
> the time all these
> people have put into the debate but I still do not
> understand how two (or
> more) people can talk - ostensibly - about the same
> subject from such
> completely different angles.
Oh this is such a sweet day indeed. Mr. Peter
Staudenmaier trying to ressurect some part of his
integrity and getting the critics to help him out a
bit. He must be getting some flack from some
constituents noting he's either lying or confused.
Wanting to be considered a 'Historian' means you
better have most of your facts right and the ones you
have wrong better be not obvious to the regular joe.
There just is too much evidence to the contrary of
what he reports regarding Steiner.
And a sweet day to Sune and Company for a job well
Do you Yahoo!?
New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing.