R: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: nichts weniger als günstig
----- Original Message -----
From: winters_dianato let go? Because the pool of
> >Rudolf Steiner quotes that can be construed as anti semitic is very
> >small and he doesn't want to lose one.
> Except that the quote was anti-Semitic whether it said "anything but
> favorable" or "nothing less than favorable."
> >Peter's obsession with everything racial in Anthroposophy and
> >Lightsearcher's obsession with everything liberal in politics could
> >be made interesting if we had a shrink on the list who could offer
> >some insight.
> Just curious, Tarjei, is anyone who studies racism
Exccuse me Diana and Tarjej .
Diana's claim is true but.... but there is a problem. Racism is to be
studied where it is. For instance I like to study Appenino's wolves or
bears' life and I go,when it is possible, where the wolves and the bears
live namely the Appenino's ranges.
Staudenmaier "studies" racism where there is no racism at all, namely
Steiner's Spiritual Science. Here lies the need of a medical help.
in a particular
> setting in depth, or at length, "obsessed" and in need of a shrink?
> This would include thousands of historians, anthropologists,
> sociologists, journalists, psychologists, activists, politicians,
> travel and biography writers, literary critics, poets and songwriters
> and performers. People devote entire careers to the study of racism
> in smaller niches than a movement like anthroposophy.
> Yahoo! Groups Links