Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: Taliban at the WC

Expand Messages
  • elfuncle
    ... not according to the WC creatures. According to them man is an animal. Therefor both Roger and rats are animals - brothers in fact. So calling Roger
    Message 1 of 3 , Sep 1, 2011
    • 0 Attachment
      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Thomas Smith" <fts.trasla@...> wrote:

      > You might think it extremely nasty my calling Roger Rawling a rat. But not according to the WC creatures. According to them man is an animal. Therefor both Roger and rats are animals - brothers in fact. So calling Roger (accurately) a rat is actually a complement, although both might feel insulted..


      I know. I've noticed that Diana feels that the notion of man being different from animals is repugnant (nauseating), and that Alicia's spiritual teacher or guru is a dog. Besides, the Unthinkable Facility has always been rat-infested -- with the rabid, poisonous kind, the descendents of those that brought the black death to Europe in the 14th century.

      Tarjei

    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.