- Never been to Moscow and not a troll. But I like Michael Gorbachev. I always hoped he would have a come back but alas, a pity he never did. Still too many RedsMessage 1 of 35 , Aug 11, 2011View SourceNever been to Moscow and not a troll. But I like Michael Gorbachev. I always hoped he would have a come back but alas, a pity he never did. Still too many Reds running the show over there.
From: elfuncle <elfuncle@...>
Sent: Friday, 12 August 2011, 12:46
Subject: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: The Sugar Cherubs and massacres
--- In email@example.com, Michael Gorbachev <berlin194533@...> wrote:
> At times Anthroposophists can come across as religious nutters.
Absolutely. They belong to the classification known to us as "anthro-wackos," who to a certain extent congregate in Yahoo groups of their own making, although the most severely afflicted anthro-wackos have escaped from institutions and are incapable of interacting with anybody online.
> The problem then is how does an Anthroposophist differentiate his/her spirituality from all the fundies out there? To the undiscerning mind, and Anthroposophist may be no different to a Scientologist for example - they both talk about spirit and use the word science in their creedo.
That's exactly what the Sugar Cherubs keep saying in the Wisdom Community, also known as the Unthinkable Facility. You'll probably find lots of support for such views in those quarters, you Moscow-troll from the hole... ;)
> You friend should know that I know at least one Anthroposophist who was a pilot, who was in an imminent crash situation and pulled the plane out of a dive 200 feet above the water. That is proof positive that not all Anthroposophically orientated pilots would end up crashing and burning in a Hudson river type situation. Presence of mind can also occur for an Anthroposophist.
The Sugar Cherubs would easily concede that too, but their point is that any airplane is more likely to crash with anthroposophists in the cockpit. Next most likely to crash would be religious fundamentalists, and least likely to crash would be atheists, preferably Sugar Cherub pilots.
- ... Well that s a new word for it, anyway.-ValMessage 35 of 35 , Aug 24, 2011View Source--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "elfuncle" <elfuncle@...> wrote:
> I'll be darned, the unmentionable AD has been admitted to the
> Unthinkable Facility. It gives the SC's an opportunity to scare away
> prospective Waldorf parents by showing the "true character" of
> anthroposophists through a "classic specimen." This is entertainment.
Well that's a new word for it, anyway.-Val