Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: More trouble in the hole?

Expand Messages
  • ted.wrinch
    Already answered: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy_tomorrow/message/45485?l=1 T. Ted Wrinch
    Message 1 of 7 , Sep 30, 2010
    • 0 Attachment
      Already answered:

      http://groups.yahoo.com/group/anthroposophy_tomorrow/message/45485?l=1

      T.

      Ted Wrinch
      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "jmn36210" <jmn36210@...> wrote:
      >
      >
      >
      >
      > Generally speaking, Ted --- is it not the Satanic hallmark of our
      > decisive times
      > that *intelligence* stunningly borders on *idiocy*?
      >
      >
      > Jean-Marc
      >
      >
      > ==================================================================
      > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "ted.wrinch"
      > <ted.wrinch@> wrote:
      > >
      > > Hi Jean-Marc
      > >
      > > You posts do have something of a familiar look to them, right down to
      > some references to 'Truth and science'!
      > > And I liked:
      > >
      > >
      > > "...books like *The Philosophy of Freedom*, *Truth and Science*,
      > > which were intentionally written to train thinking and to ensure that
      > > it could move on the highest planes [above the physical plane]
      > > with absolute confidence. Someone who studied those writings and
      > > knew absolutely nothing about theosophy could find his bearings
      > > in the higher worlds."
      > >
      > > This was my experience on reading them in my 20s. I also liked:
      > >
      > > "In my works *The Philosophy of Freedom* and *Truth and Science*
      > > it was shown that man needs to (...) first undergo a development of
      > > his inner life in order to be able to know the truth about the
      > > phenomena of the world (...)
      > > The concept of Redemption must be added to the mere causal
      > > knowing."'
      > >
      > > Containing the conception, also verified for myself, that we are
      > changed by the action of reading if we allow the experience to act
      > deeply enough upon us.
      > >
      > > But darkness swallowing the light it is. PS never does change or tire,
      > and has never been known to loose, or alter his opinion, in combat with
      > an adversary - which in itself shows a degree of sub/super humanness. He
      > is immune to evidence, reason or common sense, being guided instead by
      > his opinions, formed, apparently, from a deep hatred of Steiner and
      > things Steiner. But once he's formed that opinion, grounded in nothing
      > but prejudice, he uses his immense talent and intelligence to marshal
      > all the techniques of dishonest argument to bamboozle and confuse the
      > 'fans of Steiner'.
      > >
      > > But the problem with your quotes, Jean-Marc, is that PS will not allow
      > Rudi to speak for himself, regarding that an 'unscholarly' approach.
      > Instead, PS must legislate what Rudi meant when, for instance, he said
      > he had access to the spiritual worlds since childhood. PS knows better
      > than this, relying on his scholarly exegesis of the texts to find out
      > what was really the case, and to deduce that Rudi was an atheist in his
      > 20s and lied/fooled himself about his ability to commune with the spirit
      > worlds. So much for 'historical scholarship'.
      > >
      > >
      > > T.
      > >
      > > Ted Wrinch
      > > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "jmn36210" jmn36210@
      > wrote:
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Hi Ted,
      > > >
      > > > In your waldorf-critics message #14 424:
      > > >
      > > > 1- You mention Peter Staudenmaier's message # 13 424 [March 17,
      > > > 2010]
      > > > 2- Your pertinent question is: «He just doesn't get it does
      > he?»
      > > >
      > > > Perhaps you could:
      > > >
      > > > 1- Check waldorf-critics message # 9271 [February 14, 2009]
      > > > 2- Take into account that the passages were first posted to
      > > > waldorf-critics
      > > > in December 2006 actually!
      > > >
      > > > Isn't the light absorbed, and apparently annihilated in no time - as
      > > > if it never was?
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > Best,
      > > > Jean-Marc
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > ================================================================
      > > > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "ted.wrinch"
      > > > <ted.wrinch@> wrote:
      > > > >
      > > > > Dear all,
      > > > >
      > > > > Have I created more trouble for myself? I do hope not, as I don't
      > > > think I have the stamina for anymore PS fun.
      > > > >
      > > > > Steiner's Truth And Science
      > > > > ====================
      > > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/waldorf-critics/message/14424?l=1
      > > > >
      > > > >
      > > > > T.
      > > > >
      > > >
      > >
      >
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.