RE: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: Lazarus & Mary Magdalene
- Kim wrote:
> There were only two who reached the I AM state andHey Kim:)
> that was Lazarus and
How do you know this? I get the twinsoul concept for
it runs with the ChristSophia and I tend to go to
ChristMichaelSophia as well. Where have you read this
"two have reached the I AM state?
none other than them (well i am not
> absolutely shure here,Dottie
> because John the Baptist as Elias overcame the
> deadth, but he has another
> role to play in the story).
Okay. Lets hold onto this Magdalene/Lazarus thing for
a few moments in time. Lets check our history. If
Lazarus really existed in a physical form as a
seperate male from Magdalene he must have existed from
before. There is no way around it. We need to find who
Lazarus is if he is. I looked for him and did not find
him. I shall check again but I have absolutely no
intuitive hit as to where to look.
> Last in the book of John, Peter is given the job toDottie
> be teacher of man (it
> could be Steiner)
Whoa, that is too tempting for me to just say 'hey no
wonder he has not spoken of Magdalene. I have even
tried to reason the understanding of his not speaking
on the Feminine Mysteries due to his Aquinas supposed
incarnation. But obviously this is much deeper than
that. It almost rings to me what happened in Atlantis
with the fall. They had arrived at a truthful
existance and still had come to obliterate themselves
evne in their highest states. It must speak to this in
and John is given the job to lead
> the spiritual evolutionDottie
> of man. The only person(s) who were capable of that
> is Lazarus/Magdalene.
Kim, it so strikes me to hear you say unequivocally
that Lazarus/Magdalene do exist in the manner you
speak of. How is it that you feel so sure of this? I
haven't understood in your writing exactly how you
came to this. Me, I came to this through visions and
inspiration and intuition. I mean literally I had
visions of the Magdalene and was very much guided to
this thing piece by piece. I have had many visions and
so forth to the point I have heard the spiritual music
once upon waking up, Jesus in my room and in the
clouds and a vision and hammering sound of Golgotha
with a castle of sorts in the backround. Now, people
have concluded that I am luciferic ordained by mental
instability of sorts due to my horific childhood
experiences that do not seem so horific to me. They
have concluded that my visions are hallucinations and
speak to my mental instabillity which they then tend
to say is all ego driven for my own personal vain
glory. After these visions or rather during some of
these visions I found myself checking certain
references pertaining to Magdalene and Sophia and I
was onto a stream that guided me down the river.
I had always wondered that this wisdom thing in the
Bible actually sounded like a real person versus a
state of understanding. I've always wondered that it
was Eve who first partook of Knowledge and then handed
it to man symbolicaly. I've always wondered about
Lucifer being the Light Bearer. And I would pull all
these various streams together read the Bible, found
Elija and Elisha (feminine I believe) and the one whom
God helped. Everywhere I looked Magdalene was there
just perservering with the coolest most humblest all
loving power I have ever been fortunate to encounter.
So, I want to see your tracks so I can divine to this
understanding you have found. And it is not because I
have a preference to Magdalene. I do not. It just is
what it is to me and if I find Lazarus that would be
just as good. I just want to make the mystery mine. I
want to understand what lives within me so I can share
it with others who are so hungering for ChristSophia.
> John is the evangelist! as it is stated last inDottie
> Jonhs evangelium, and I
> think that John is the combination of Lazarus and
I don't know about this. I hold John to be terrified
just like the rest of the men or rather asleep in it.
He was not above them by any means. And if we follow
Steiner, which I am not saying we have to, this would
not hold water due to the fact that it is a physical
Lazarus that becomes John the Baptist not John the
Okay, hold on a second are you holding John the
Evangelist and John the disciple as the same person?
Do you have a bible where you can translate what you
are referring to regarding 'it is stated in the last
of Johns evangelum?
And I have to say, this is where everything is so
difficult to really decipher without reading the
Akashic records. These spirits intermingle and
seperating them to understand can be excruciating. And
with many pieces of the bible being redacted and
poorly translated the mission is almost impossible
unless we divine with the little truth we have to the
With your own
> preferences you can only see the the feminine aspectDottie
> of them.
Oh please hold off on saying this. I don't have a
preference it only looks this way due to the singular
nature of my Sophia studies. I have found that man has
indeed hidden the Feminine Mysteries or maybe they are
best understood as the Daughter/Son Mysteries. For
what reason I am not so sure but it sure is feeling
real sweet with the balance coming upon us in the near
future. And then my singular study will be to find the
Father and Lucifer.
I also have
> the 'intuition' that the mysteri has to do with theDottie
> Holy Spirit, which is
> the feminine part of the trinity.
Nothing can be done with out the feminine spiritual
reality of Sophia. Not a thing in this physical
existance. The feminine aspect of which all men and
women, possibly elementals and so forth, create, is
excited by the Feminine Divine. There is 'nothing'
that is made without her. She is the creative force in
the Universe in my understanding. And it is a mystery
that was well understood thousands of years ago.
And your intuition is right on in my understanding.
Finding the balance between Father and Mother through
the Son and Daughter is where I believe evolution is
> Something more to consider, they have finished theirDottie
> development on this
> earth, that is, their constitution is not comparable
> to normal man.
Do you intend to mean that they will not incarnate
again? Wouldn't that then put them in the Buddist
Lodge? And wouldn't that then mean that they have
attained this level. And wouldn't that then mean they
had attained it during the Christ time here on earth
in Jesus' body? Who else is in this lodge.
> In NT, especially John's, it's difficult to knowDottie
> where it's physical or
> spiritual, or both.
Its both to me other than where I can sense it has
been redacted and then it becomes completely man
covered up. And this was before I ever found Father
In Steiner terminology the
> roses symbolizes LuciferDottie
> (chaos) and Ahriman (extreme order) and
> Christ/good/Love/Life as the road in
> between, in equilibrium.
Wow, that is very cool. Me an Ahriman are not eye to
eye. However I love Lucifer very much. I just finished
the final chapter, of Essoteric Christianity today and
I am going to post a thought on why the body of Christ
did not hold longer than three years as well as
Lucifer guiding us back through the spheres to an
Who was the first ego bound human, do you know?
And another thing, but I really want to stay with our
main theme,........ good it just left my mind:)
> NB! I down't know if it should be Blossom or FlowerDottie
> (It's translated from
I am so jealous you have found the most beautiful
salutation I have ever experienced:)Truly.... I hope
you put it on all of my posts it truly inspires me to
Love to you Kim,
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
> Lazarus-John didn't only write the Fourth Gospel, but also theApocalypse.
> These most profound and sublime documents of all time could only bewritten
> by someone who had been personally initiated by Christ Himself:Lazarus.
I am inspired to write a 'scholarly' :) piece on this today. In this
I would like to say Magdalene was also initiated by Christ. There is
absolutely no way around it. I am not sure if your comment means that
only Lazarus was initiated by Christ, does it?
Not only this but this week the headline for the Christmas Time
Magazine was Magdalene. Kind of interesting beings it usually is the
Mother Mary and the Babe. My friend saw the cover on my desk and
mentioned 'boy that looks like Mona Lisa'. And you know what, he is
right. So, got to thinking which led me to Da Vincis Mona Lisa. Now
reading the novel, The Da Vinci Codes something interesting it
brought out by known art scholars and that is that the picture is
actually considered a male/female painting. Magdalene: male/female.
Now, obviously this does not mean that I am right regarding Magdalene
however these little points will keep coming up till we get it about
this Feminine Mystery that was hidden by the Church. Peter was the
outer church and Magdalene represents the inner church.
I am going to pull this together in a little paper. I do not believe
it goes against anything Dr. STeiner said. I do believe that as
students we are not to stop at his death with the things he shared
with us. We are to go further or we are stuck in the mud. He hinted
that the Feminine Mysteries are going to be unveiled and they are. He
did not say who represented them although he did hint at it. If we
read his works between the lines, like we do the Bible, we will come
to this truth.
Its funny because a thought just came to me about John/Lazarus
writing the Fourth Gospel. Usually Mother Mary is not considered an
ispirant yet she is considered to have lived with this John. Now
suddenly people are starting to say John was inspired by living with
the Holy Mother intimating that it is a book by both in a sense.
People are starting to feel this Magdalene/Daughter intuitive energy
because they are acknowledging her in a sense. It is so readily
available to one who seeks.