Re: RS about racial evolution
- Peter Staudenmaier's utter foolishness!
"There is no such thing as going forward or backward in evolution.
When the notion of moving forward in evolution is directly tied to
race, this idea becomes racist. No race is more evolutionarily
advanced than any other race. To hold otherwise is to endorse a very
obvious variety of racism."
Peter you are an idiot! Forward, retardation, going backward, Oh
what an unlearned child you are. Because Evolving is seemingly
forward it makes a nice term doesn't it? The condition of
retardation doesn't merely come from races... or races at all.
Retardation comes from Retarding beings. You are such a retard. And
with every shrunken headed concept you prove how you serve the very
retarded thinking that has set back entire cultures with utter
Retarding beings keep idiots like you in service presenting retarded
concepts and these then infect, and inflame the various retarded
ideologies that you dally with. Racism is retarded when it comes out
of your mouth. Antisemeitism is just common intellectual fodder,
divorced from Archangels or any thing to do with concepts and ideals
beyond your immature and narrow scope. You Serve Retarded thinking
and therefore evolution does go backward you dim with. Racism for
you is leveling and dismissing qualites inhereent in different
language based cultures, but the individual I Am who goes forward to
brotherhood and idealism transcends all this bullshit you wallow in.
Upwards in the thinking world, where idealism lives, brotherhood
prevails. Descending into the constipation of your body which you
call thinking, narrows down to your own small intestinal tract and
amounts to digestive will thinking. Thank you, Hitler felt the same
way as you. How, how ever did such creatures as yourself ever
imagine that you could equally participate with thinking individuals
who have attained actual ideals?
Obviously someone who makes such idiot blanket statements that have
no grounding, no reality and no substance has no idea about how true
brotherhood is won. It is not won by not understanding the virtues
of various cultures, Italian, French, German, Native American,
Jewish..Chinese... it means that one studies the general and
specific, but certainly, far above your examination of second hand
reality, is the fact of how the distrubution of various qualites
were meted out by the Divine. A divine that has to pass the test of
your egotism and stupidity before it can be taken up. Meanwhile, you
serve active retardation of human ideals. In other words, evolution
does goe backward just beccause of your thinking.
Another reason for calling you an idiot is that there is no Divine
in you examination of reality. It is all a fatal show, a play, a
ploy and you have failed to touch the depth of the science of how
the etheric body, releases the life tableau, and NDE experiences
reveal enormous dimensions of the godhead that your egotism will not
allow. Now Nietzsche could call Christ an idiot and one saw who was
doing the speaking for Nietzsche. I call you an idiot because you
don't know who is doing the speaking for your own pathetic,
immature, unexplored and failed ideas.
To even have an idea, might mean you have to think... but
retardation of ideas, retardation of humanity, retardation of
brotherhood is professed with shere egotism, blindness and cold
cunning. It destroys your whole Ecological and Green as well as
social marxist idealism, because these ideas are not rooted in any
reality what so ever. They have never been researched with the depth
of Consciousness that grasps the whole framework of evolution and
divinity as the unfolding magnificence of the I Am in humanity.
The fact that you cannot detect the difference between true idealism
and dialectical materialism allows anybody with half a heart to
scorn and reject your illogical platforms as both immature and
lacking in understanding the sweep of I AM history all the way back
to Saturn evolution. You are an unlearned, unresearched, one track
intellectual without a compass for truth.
You are a pygmie and everyone who thinks as you do, prove themselves
to be pygmies and slaves of Ahriman's intellectual college of idiots.
You haven't had an original thought ever. You ride on a stream of
idiots just like yourself and you are jealous and envious that Dr.
Steiner did his homework and so ourshines any of you egotistical
worms that you think you can come to the dead carcass of sprirtual
science and, like some dumb ass buzzard peck at his flesh.
WRONG! The level of insight on this list alone, reveals the
shrivelled, dried husks of thought you devour as food. Steiner is
not buzzard food for the likes of you. The gods themselves feast on
the communion that Steiner shared with humanity. You, however,
failed to get an invitation to the party.
- Another difficult question that Peter Staudenmaier continues to run away from: cultural evolution. He has indignantly declared that natural selection does not apply to cultures. I don't know why he thought anyone would claim such a thing. But he cannot explain if he feels cultures evolve at all, or how. Condescend to me, Peter. Try answering this.
Daniel Hindes----- Original Message -----From: at@ael...Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 10:21 PMSubject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] RS about racial evolutionHi Daniel, you wrote:"So the human body evolved, and ideas evolve, but cultures (composed of bodies and ideas) don't evolve?"Peter Staudenmaier:Not by natural selection. If you believe that cultures evolve by natural selection, then I think you have an inadequate grasp of the concept. Cultures are neither genetic nor hereditary.Daniel:Peter, one of the first things you learn in Biology is that evolution does not equal natural selection. There are many theories of evolution. Relativly few of them involve natural selection as the method of evolution (though the generally accepted ones do). Your education might benefit from a few basic biology courses.Repeat: "Evolution does not equal natural selection."Good, now I hope that you won't misapply the methods of biology to culture (you of all people should know what a mess that creates).Back to my origional question:"So the human body evolved, and ideas evolve, but cultures (composed of bodies and ideas) don't evolve?"Note: I did not ask if cultures evolved through natural selection. I asked if they evolved at all by any mechanism.Daniel Hindes