Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: RS re true internationalism

Expand Messages
  • Judge Mental
    Hi all again, it s teh newbie here, Thank you, Mr Mason, for answering my question with integrity. And wow! what an interesting conversation this turned out to
    Message 1 of 43 , Sep 11, 2008
      Hi all again, it's teh newbie here,

      Thank you, Mr Mason, for answering my question with integrity. And wow! what an interesting conversation this turned out to be.

      I will have a look on the people you mentioned. Like it was said here earlier, the talk about anthroposophical ideas seems to be based on, in most cases, circumstantial evidence. And that is simply not enough when discussing ideas beyond this world.

      Anyway, the real question of course is, how to recognize Ahrimanic tendencies in us. For myself, it is an everyday struggle to keep my thoughts clear and my intentions sincere. Being aware is difficult but indifference's easy.

      Thanks for reading,


      ----- Original Message ----
      From: Robert Mason <robertsmason_99@...>
      To: a t list <anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com>
      Sent: Friday, 5 September, 2008 22:12:30
      Subject: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: RS re true internationalism

      To V, who wrote:

      >>I have one question to start with. Are you, Mr. Mason, the same
      Robert Mason who wrote a lengthy article about Ahriman that is available
      all around Internet?<<

      Robert writes:

      I'll have to plead *guilty*.

      V wrote:

      >>If I may ask, do you think Steiner will incarnate in (Northern) America as a woman or do you think he will appear only in the non-physical level?<<

      Robert writes:

      I don't have any inside information, other than
      what I wrote at the end of the *Ahriman* page,
      and what you could find out by following the
      link to "Brunnen von Christus" and asking
      Martha Keltz.

      V wrote:

      >>The years 1998-2000 have passed and I guess we should be seeing the
      first signs of Ahriman's incorporation. I wonder who could that
      A messianic figure who will bring the different people together,
      preach the message of unity and understanding and seem to possess a
      vast amount of Charisma.<<

      Robert writes:

      Again, I don't have any inside *information* ,
      other than what I have already written. There
      are mamny speculations or "revelations" around.

      One (alleged) Anthro who used to be very
      active on these e-lists has named Karl Rove as
      the incarnation of Ahriman. Take that for
      whatever it's worth; I'd say about zero.

      I've seen some talk that the active "rule"
      of Ahriman will take place in the 42 months
      leading up to Dec. 21, 2012. And I've seen
      a suggestion that, considering that the
      False Prophet might have been born 6 months
      before Ahriman as the Baptist was born 6
      months before the Luke Jusus, and postulating
      that Ahriman was born in Feb. 1962 -- then
      the charismatic False Prophet would have
      been born in early August 1961. And take
      that for whatever it's worth, but I wouldn't
      do anything rash.

      Bottom line: I don't really know.

      V wrote:

      >>I know Lievegoed predicted that Ahriman's incorporation will take
      place in the Middle East but I wonder what made him to think that
      way? Maybe he got an glimpse of his name, an Arabic sounding name...<<

      Robert writes:

      I don't know about L, but I have heard indirectly
      that Willi Sucher thought that the Antichrist
      was born in Tobruk during the astrological
      event of February 1962. I don't know why, or
      really even whether he came to that conclusion,
      but if he did, I would assume that it was on
      astroposophical considerations.

      Robert Mason

    • nadmateescu
      Dear Robert, As I followed your posts about R. Powell s statements, there is another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in regard of these
      Message 43 of 43 , Feb 25, 2009
        Dear Robert,

        As I followed your posts about R. Powell's statements, there is
        another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in
        regard of these subjects.


        Christ & the Maya Calendar
        2012 & the Coming of the Antichrist
        Robert Powell, Kevin Dann

        Best regards, Dan

        --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Mason"
        <robertsmason_99@...> wrote:
        > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "moniker_9"
        > <moniker_9@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Robert, there's something I'm unclear about here. That date in
        > > February of 1962 for Ahriman's incarnation - was that from Willi
        > > Sucher or Jean Dixon? - Larry
        > Robert writes:
        > Both, apparently. Here is a report from Robert
        > Powell:
        > <http://www.eleggua.com/Spirit/Powell6.html>
        > ***
        > In fact a definite date for the birth of Antichrist was communicated
        > by the American clairvoyant Jeanne Dixon in her book My Life and
        > Prophecies. In this book she refers to a vision she had of the birth
        > of Antichrist at sunrise on February 5 1962, at a place in the Middle
        > East - a matter of hours after a total eclipse of the Sun in the
        > sidereal sign of Capricorn. There was indeed a most spectacular
        > alignment of planets in Capricorn at this time of birth of Antichrist
        > as indicated by Jeanne Dixon, with Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, the
        > Sun, Mercury and the Moon aligned with the Moon's Node in Capricorn.
        > The last time such a grand conjunction of the seven visible planets
        > occurred was in 1524. If the future "World President"was actually
        > born in 1962, then in 2010 he will be forty-eight years old, at the
        > height of his power.
        > In a conversation with Willi Sucher (1902 - 1985) some sixteen years
        > ago, he indicated that he had done research into Jeanne Dixon's
        > vision and found it quite plausible. Willi Sucher even identified the
        > place of birth as Tobruk, Libya. When asked about the significance of
        > the planetary alignment in Capricorn, he replied: "In antiquity
        > Capricorn was called the 'gateway of the gods', and what better
        > moment could Antichrist choose to be born than when all the planets
        > are aligned in front of Capricorn, blocking the gateway to the
        > spiritual world, in order to establish his rulership in a world of
        > materialism, cutting off humanity from all spirituality.
        > Whether or not Jeanne Dixon's vision is true remains to be seen.
        > ***
        > Robert M continues:
        > Indeed; many of Jeanne Dixon's prophecies were
        > proven to be false, while some apparently came
        > true. And while much of what Powell writes is
        > IMO very dubious, to put it mildly, I would
        > assume that he can get the astronomical facts
        > straight, and I wouldn't think that he would
        > lie about Sucher. But still, we don't know
        > exactly what Sucher said.
        > Robert Mason
        > "
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.