Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: RS re true internationalism

Expand Messages
  • write3chairs
    ... As it so happens, my dearly beloved brother was born in early August of 1961, and what s more: He is moving to Germany this month, in just a few weeks.
    Message 1 of 43 , Sep 8, 2008
      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "elfuncle" wrote:

      > According to RS, Ahriman's physical incarnation will happen some time
      > during the first third of the 21st century, i.e. by 2333 at the latest.
      > But why wait if such exciting stuff ain't gonna happen in our own
      > lifetime? Apocalypse Now!

      As it so happens, my dearly beloved brother was born in early
      August of 1961, and what's more: He is moving to Germany
      this month, in just a few weeks. Considering that he is a
      retired Lt. Col. in the U.S.Army, what are the chances that
      he's our man? We could be on the brink of something big!

      Peace, love, and magic mushrooms,

      > We have seen all kinds of varieties on this theme, that Ahriman
      > already incarnated back in the 1940s and what have you, that Rudolf
      > Steiner has reincarnated as a woman in America, and if not, he's
      > talking to certain cyber-anthros from the other side --
      > And I quess whether McCain or Obama gets the honor of being crowned
      > Ahriman or the Antichrist or the Beast of the False Prophet or the
      > Dragon depends, I guess, on the political prefereces of the
      > anthroposopher apocalypsia in question from the notorious Michael
      > School for initiates and select honor students of occult brainstorming....
      > Praise Lucifer and pass the acid, swallow some mescaline down with
      > tequila for the sake of psychedelic nostalgia.
      > Tarjei
      > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Thomas Smith"
      > <eltrigal78@> wrote:
      > >
      > > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, Robert Mason
      > > <robertsmason_99@> wrote:
      > > >
      > > >
      > > > I've seen some talk that the active "rule"
      > > > of Ahriman will take place in the 42 months
      > > > leading up to Dec. 21, 2012. And I've seen
      > > > a suggestion that, considering that the
      > > > False Prophet might have been born 6 months
      > > > before Ahriman as the Baptist was born 6
      > > > months before the Luke Jusus, and postulating
      > > > that Ahriman was born in Feb. 1962 -- then
      > > > the charismatic False Prophet would have
      > > > been born in early August 1961. And take
      > > > that for whatever it's worth, but I wouldn't
      > > > do anything rash.
      > > _____
      > > Are you and newbie implying that Obama is the "false Prophet"? If so
      > > why not just come out and say so? But don't do anything rash!
      > > Frank
      > >
    • nadmateescu
      Dear Robert, As I followed your posts about R. Powell s statements, there is another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in regard of these
      Message 43 of 43 , Feb 25, 2009
        Dear Robert,

        As I followed your posts about R. Powell's statements, there is
        another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in
        regard of these subjects.


        Christ & the Maya Calendar
        2012 & the Coming of the Antichrist
        Robert Powell, Kevin Dann

        Best regards, Dan

        --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Mason"
        <robertsmason_99@...> wrote:
        > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "moniker_9"
        > <moniker_9@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Robert, there's something I'm unclear about here. That date in
        > > February of 1962 for Ahriman's incarnation - was that from Willi
        > > Sucher or Jean Dixon? - Larry
        > Robert writes:
        > Both, apparently. Here is a report from Robert
        > Powell:
        > <http://www.eleggua.com/Spirit/Powell6.html>
        > ***
        > In fact a definite date for the birth of Antichrist was communicated
        > by the American clairvoyant Jeanne Dixon in her book My Life and
        > Prophecies. In this book she refers to a vision she had of the birth
        > of Antichrist at sunrise on February 5 1962, at a place in the Middle
        > East - a matter of hours after a total eclipse of the Sun in the
        > sidereal sign of Capricorn. There was indeed a most spectacular
        > alignment of planets in Capricorn at this time of birth of Antichrist
        > as indicated by Jeanne Dixon, with Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, the
        > Sun, Mercury and the Moon aligned with the Moon's Node in Capricorn.
        > The last time such a grand conjunction of the seven visible planets
        > occurred was in 1524. If the future "World President"was actually
        > born in 1962, then in 2010 he will be forty-eight years old, at the
        > height of his power.
        > In a conversation with Willi Sucher (1902 - 1985) some sixteen years
        > ago, he indicated that he had done research into Jeanne Dixon's
        > vision and found it quite plausible. Willi Sucher even identified the
        > place of birth as Tobruk, Libya. When asked about the significance of
        > the planetary alignment in Capricorn, he replied: "In antiquity
        > Capricorn was called the 'gateway of the gods', and what better
        > moment could Antichrist choose to be born than when all the planets
        > are aligned in front of Capricorn, blocking the gateway to the
        > spiritual world, in order to establish his rulership in a world of
        > materialism, cutting off humanity from all spirituality.
        > Whether or not Jeanne Dixon's vision is true remains to be seen.
        > ***
        > Robert M continues:
        > Indeed; many of Jeanne Dixon's prophecies were
        > proven to be false, while some apparently came
        > true. And while much of what Powell writes is
        > IMO very dubious, to put it mildly, I would
        > assume that he can get the astronomical facts
        > straight, and I wouldn't think that he would
        > lie about Sucher. But still, we don't know
        > exactly what Sucher said.
        > Robert Mason
        > "
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.