Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: RS re true internationalism

Expand Messages
  • dottie zold
    I have to agree with you Taz. And another thing occurs is that we are always always seeing Ahriman and Lucifer in others but fail to recognize these elements
    Message 1 of 43 , Sep 6, 2008
      I have to agree with you Taz. And another thing occurs is that we are always always seeing Ahriman and Lucifer in others but fail to recognize these elements within ourselves. It's easier to put it outside in someone elses behaviour and yet me thinks we do a great disservice to our own striving soul to see it in such a manner. It might appeal to our egos but whoa unto man if he has not uncovered within his own being the kernel of coldness towards another. The words I recall are 'do unto others as you would have done unto you'.
      All good things,

      --- On Sat, 9/6/08, elfuncle <coolvibes@...> wrote:
      From: elfuncle <coolvibes@...>
      Subject: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: RS re true internationalism
      To: anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com
      Date: Saturday, September 6, 2008, 9:09 PM

      RS said that Sorath's third strike would happen in 1998, it takes
      place every 666 years with increasing strength, thus the mystic number
      in the Apocalypse:
      Sorath's first strike: 666 AD
      Sorath's second strike: 1332 AD
      Sorath's third strike: 1998 AD
      Personally, I wouldn't confuse the recurrence of Sorath's influence 
      with Ahriman's physical incarnation, but anyone wishing for Ahriman to
      be walking amongst us today in the flesh must think whatever they like
      and shuffle the cards as they please. Welcome to trippy
      anthro-speculations, there's plenty to pick and choose from.
      --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Kim"
      <kimgm@...> wrote:
      > We have all thought that the Ahriman Steiner talks about as 
      > incarnating in 1998 was a human being, but what if its an elektronic 
      > entity and/or Corporation? That would be in line with what Ahriman 
      > stands for, and there is a baby born in september 1998 who already 
      > looks like being the internets most influential entity, and maybe in 
      > the future being synonymous with the internet.
      Yahoo! Groups Links
      <*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
      <*> Your email settings:
          Individual Email | Traditional
      <*> To change settings online go to:
          (Yahoo! ID required)
      <*> To change settings via email:
      <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
      <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

    • nadmateescu
      Dear Robert, As I followed your posts about R. Powell s statements, there is another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in regard of these
      Message 43 of 43 , Feb 25, 2009
        Dear Robert,

        As I followed your posts about R. Powell's statements, there is
        another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in
        regard of these subjects.


        Christ & the Maya Calendar
        2012 & the Coming of the Antichrist
        Robert Powell, Kevin Dann

        Best regards, Dan

        --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Robert Mason"
        <robertsmason_99@...> wrote:
        > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "moniker_9"
        > <moniker_9@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Robert, there's something I'm unclear about here. That date in
        > > February of 1962 for Ahriman's incarnation - was that from Willi
        > > Sucher or Jean Dixon? - Larry
        > Robert writes:
        > Both, apparently. Here is a report from Robert
        > Powell:
        > <http://www.eleggua.com/Spirit/Powell6.html>
        > ***
        > In fact a definite date for the birth of Antichrist was communicated
        > by the American clairvoyant Jeanne Dixon in her book My Life and
        > Prophecies. In this book she refers to a vision she had of the birth
        > of Antichrist at sunrise on February 5 1962, at a place in the Middle
        > East - a matter of hours after a total eclipse of the Sun in the
        > sidereal sign of Capricorn. There was indeed a most spectacular
        > alignment of planets in Capricorn at this time of birth of Antichrist
        > as indicated by Jeanne Dixon, with Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, the
        > Sun, Mercury and the Moon aligned with the Moon's Node in Capricorn.
        > The last time such a grand conjunction of the seven visible planets
        > occurred was in 1524. If the future "World President"was actually
        > born in 1962, then in 2010 he will be forty-eight years old, at the
        > height of his power.
        > In a conversation with Willi Sucher (1902 - 1985) some sixteen years
        > ago, he indicated that he had done research into Jeanne Dixon's
        > vision and found it quite plausible. Willi Sucher even identified the
        > place of birth as Tobruk, Libya. When asked about the significance of
        > the planetary alignment in Capricorn, he replied: "In antiquity
        > Capricorn was called the 'gateway of the gods', and what better
        > moment could Antichrist choose to be born than when all the planets
        > are aligned in front of Capricorn, blocking the gateway to the
        > spiritual world, in order to establish his rulership in a world of
        > materialism, cutting off humanity from all spirituality.
        > Whether or not Jeanne Dixon's vision is true remains to be seen.
        > ***
        > Robert M continues:
        > Indeed; many of Jeanne Dixon's prophecies were
        > proven to be false, while some apparently came
        > true. And while much of what Powell writes is
        > IMO very dubious, to put it mildly, I would
        > assume that he can get the astronomical facts
        > straight, and I wouldn't think that he would
        > lie about Sucher. But still, we don't know
        > exactly what Sucher said.
        > Robert Mason
        > "
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.