Re: RS re true internationalism
- To V, who wrote:
>>I have one question to start with. Are you, Mr. Mason, the sameRobert Mason who wrote a lengthy article about Ahriman that is available
all around Internet?<<
I'll have to plead *guilty*.
>>If I may ask, do you think Steiner will incarnate in (Northern) America as a woman or do you think he will appear only in the non-physical level?<<Robert writes:
I don't have any inside information, other than
what I wrote at the end of the *Ahriman* page,
and what you could find out by following the
link to "Brunnen von Christus" and asking
>>The years 1998-2000 have passed and I guess we should be seeing thefirst signs of Ahriman's incorporation. I wonder who could that
A messianic figure who will bring the different people together,
preach the message of unity and understanding and seem to possess a
vast amount of Charisma.<<
Again, I don't have any inside *information*,
other than what I have already written. There
are mamny speculations or "revelations" around.
One (alleged) Anthro who used to be very
active on these e-lists has named Karl Rove as
the incarnation of Ahriman. Take that for
whatever it's worth; I'd say about zero.
I've seen some talk that the active "rule"
of Ahriman will take place in the 42 months
leading up to Dec. 21, 2012. And I've seen
a suggestion that, considering that the
False Prophet might have been born 6 months
before Ahriman as the Baptist was born 6
months before the Luke Jusus, and postulating
that Ahriman was born in Feb. 1962 -- then
the charismatic False Prophet would have
been born in early August 1961. And take
that for whatever it's worth, but I wouldn't
do anything rash.
Bottom line: I don't really know.
>>I know Lievegoed predicted that Ahriman's incorporation will takeplace in the Middle East but I wonder what made him to think that
way? Maybe he got an glimpse of his name, an Arabic sounding name...<<
I don't know about L, but I have heard indirectly
that Willi Sucher thought that the Antichrist
was born in Tobruk during the astrological
event of February 1962. I don't know why, or
really even whether he came to that conclusion,
but if he did, I would assume that it was on
- Dear Robert,
As I followed your posts about R. Powell's statements, there is
another book which maybe will provide some interesting aspects in
regard of these subjects.
Christ & the Maya Calendar
2012 & the Coming of the Antichrist
Robert Powell, Kevin Dann
Best regards, Dan
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Robert Mason"
> --- In email@example.com, "moniker_9"
> <moniker_9@> wrote:
> > Robert, there's something I'm unclear about here. That date in
> > February of 1962 for Ahriman's incarnation - was that from Willi
> > Sucher or Jean Dixon? - Larry
> Robert writes:
> Both, apparently. Here is a report from Robert
> In fact a definite date for the birth of Antichrist was communicated
> by the American clairvoyant Jeanne Dixon in her book My Life and
> Prophecies. In this book she refers to a vision she had of the birth
> of Antichrist at sunrise on February 5 1962, at a place in the Middle
> East - a matter of hours after a total eclipse of the Sun in the
> sidereal sign of Capricorn. There was indeed a most spectacular
> alignment of planets in Capricorn at this time of birth of Antichrist
> as indicated by Jeanne Dixon, with Saturn, Jupiter, Mars, Venus, the
> Sun, Mercury and the Moon aligned with the Moon's Node in Capricorn.
> The last time such a grand conjunction of the seven visible planets
> occurred was in 1524. If the future "World President"was actually
> born in 1962, then in 2010 he will be forty-eight years old, at the
> height of his power.
> In a conversation with Willi Sucher (1902 - 1985) some sixteen years
> ago, he indicated that he had done research into Jeanne Dixon's
> vision and found it quite plausible. Willi Sucher even identified the
> place of birth as Tobruk, Libya. When asked about the significance of
> the planetary alignment in Capricorn, he replied: "In antiquity
> Capricorn was called the 'gateway of the gods', and what better
> moment could Antichrist choose to be born than when all the planets
> are aligned in front of Capricorn, blocking the gateway to the
> spiritual world, in order to establish his rulership in a world of
> materialism, cutting off humanity from all spirituality.
> Whether or not Jeanne Dixon's vision is true remains to be seen.
> Robert M continues:
> Indeed; many of Jeanne Dixon's prophecies were
> proven to be false, while some apparently came
> true. And while much of what Powell writes is
> IMO very dubious, to put it mildly, I would
> assume that he can get the astronomical facts
> straight, and I wouldn't think that he would
> lie about Sucher. But still, we don't know
> exactly what Sucher said.
> Robert Mason