Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: Sophia and the Feminine Upper

Expand Messages
  • Albert Sándor
    I do not know. :) ... From: dottie zold To: anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:07 PM Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow]
    Message 1 of 43 , Jun 4, 2008
    • 0 Attachment
      I do not know. :)
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 6:07 PM
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: Sophia and the Feminine Upper

      What reality are you talking about Sandor?

       

      All good things,

      Dottie

      --- On Wed, 6/4/08, Albert Sándor <montek@astralnet. ro> wrote:

      From: Albert Sándor <montek@astralnet. ro>
      Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sophia and the Feminine Upper
      To: anthroposophy_ tomorrow@ yahoogroups. com
      Date: Wednesday, June 4, 2008, 1:10 AM

      Yes, I have a living room. And no matter how masterfully I describe it, you will not know it until you become my guest.
      I did not say descriptipons are useless. I said they cannot fully represent reality. They represent an image of reality. Why is that so hard to accept ?
       
      ----- Original Message -----
      Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 9:35 PM
      Subject: [anthroposophy_ tomorrow] Re: Sophia and the Feminine Upper

      --- In anthroposophy_ tomorrow@ yahoogroups. com, Albert Sándor wrote:

      > How do you describe something alive ?

      You just do.

      > A describable world would be a dead one.

      No it wouldn't. :)

      Do you have a "living" room in your home?

      Cheers,
      Jennifer


    • dottie zold
      Okay, okay okay:) whew to be again like in the old days is not such a bad thing is what I think...anyhows here is something from the same page:   The
      Message 43 of 43 , Jun 8, 2008
      • 0 Attachment

        Okay, okay okay:) whew to be again like in the old days is not such a bad thing is what I think...anyhows here is something from the same page:

         

        "The respective advantages of each of these is that the H shape preserves the notion of three pillars that supposedly "support the temple", while the A tree preserves the equilateral triangle shape. (Note the zig-zagging red line on the A tree. This follows the succesive spheres, and is described as looking like a lightning bolt.)

        Mixing Metaphors

        As I pointed out earlier, the Tree of Life legend is based on, and analogous to, the model of Jacob's Ladder; but as you well know a tree is not a ladder. A E Waite addresses this issue in his "A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry" (p 409):

         

        Dottie: Now, who's ladder are we climbing? And who is it that we, as we tread this path, take up with us? Oh boy.

         

        d



        --- On Sun, 6/8/08, dottie zold <dottie_z@...> wrote:

        From: dottie zold <dottie_z@...>
        Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Gates of Light
        To: anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008, 12:12 PM

        Now, in this picture:

         

        http://web.newsguy.com/bigbytes/dc_cathedral/cathedral10.htm

         

        can you see where Lucifer is in the Tree of Life? If anyone recalls Rudolf Steiner drew a picture of Lucifer. Now, we can see on the Tree of Life why it would be said that Lucifer would be the future Holy Spirit: Lucifer is embedded in the Tree of Life its very self as is Sophia who is the backbone, the Tree its very self. Whew. Well, at least these are my thoughts.

         

        Okay okay okay, I still have not mastered putting an image in my post. I image that's because I have not even tried other than one time pre Tarjeic instructions:) So, I shall upload the picture into my files on this list. However I want to say maybe yall shall take a looksee to find where Lucifer is and in what picture before you open my picture of the Tree:)))

         

        All good good things again,

        d

         

        All good things,

        Dottie

        --- On Sun, 6/8/08, dottie zold <dottie_z@...> wrote:

        From: dottie zold <dottie_z@...>
        Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Gates of Light
        To: anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Sunday, June 8, 2008, 12:05 PM


        In case you didn't go to the second page:)

         

        http://web.newsguy.com/bigbytes/dc_cathedral/cathedral10.htm




      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.