- Freedom of speech...the speaking of and the speaking to...of which
contention can be part...it happens in a free context,eh?
Deeds ain't speech...they're a doing.
Over time the Waldorf folks and the Critics have at each other within
a free speech context...then some shitbird(s) decides things aren't
going their way and decide to DO something. They bring suit with the
intention of doing actual damage to people...and so on. The
justification for the suit lies in some "higher purpose" supported by
crappy ideology...but an outside observer sees it has to do with
Here. The speaking to and the speaking of...doesn't matter what the
issue is. Then some shitbird decides to DO something...whatever can
be done to screw up the free context because they perceive that they
aren't faring too well...it's a weak personal thing with an
ideological covering...it plays the "victim" card knowing it must have
an effect within the explicit context of internet...and the funny
part, it gets support from some "friends of Anthroposophy"...to all of
you who support such DOINGS...take your weak, whiny ideology and stick
it where the sun doth not shine...McC
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "elfuncle"
>Somewhat reluctantly, I have to admit that this is good circus.Canceled or stood up? He wouldn't have the nerve to speak to me face to
>Deleted messages to be tracked down and exhumed and then sent off to
>someone's spouse after a date in Manhattan was canceled or stood up --
face in an anthroposophical eon. He was too scared to even acknowledge
He'll mutter periodically about "real women," but real men don't sit at
their computers writing to women the kinds of things he writes to
women - only scared little boys do that.