Re: Aristotelians and Platonists
- Another post typical of Dottie, whom some of you think of as
excelling at "heart thinking." This post just tells who she thinks is
cool and who is not, and taunts an individual for being not as cool
as someone else. This is immaturity, not spirituality.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, dottie zold
> Anyway thanks again for unlurking. I hope my
> > Scorpionic destructivity
> > will be right kind of spiritual demolition work that
> > opens up the
> > forum and the field for some new anthroposophical
> > thinking and insights.
> What an ego Tom. To actually think planned demolition
> is your very own task as it will 'open up thinking and
> insights'. That's what they say about Joel so I
> imagine you get to stand behind him. We all know how
> uncomfortable that has been for you, him being the
> leading anti anthroposophist of his time here in the
> states supposedly and you just playing second fiddle.
> Why not try for freedom Tom, instead of doing the
> bidding of your ego.
> All good things,
> Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your home page.
- I'm not sure Tom wants to know his stream. He wants to be a STREAM
or perhaps a BOMB. Modesty and humility are not Tom's strengths, so
--- In email@example.com, "Simone" <sim1di@...>
> Tom, for the sake of my highlights, yesterday you were more
> than Aristotle himself, ready to settle thousands-year-old scoreswith
> the Platonists, today the bomb-logger-Platotelian cap fits you Oh,Brian
> Man, know thy Stream!!!
> Frau Dok
> --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "tmasthenes13"
> <TomBuoyed@> wrote:
> > --- In email@example.com, "Scott Olmsted"
> > sa.olmsted@ wrote:
> > >
> > > All this talk about Platotelians got me remembering something
> > Gray atoff
> > > RSC said at a conference on this very matter. It was kind of
> > the cuffwho
> > > and a long while ago but I think he said that there were some
> > > "special" incarnation circumstances that were in both streams.
> > > these people tended to sit on the sidelines and lob bombs into
> > movement.or
> > > I thought it made sense: Categorizers needing a dramatic push,
> > dramatiststhe
> > > thinking they could channel the chaos with some well placed
> > >
> > > For what it's worth...
> > >
> > > >Val here pointed out something I missed. You were right about
> > > >streams being over and under, but that's all ancient historynow
> > > >because both streams are now incarnated together, as Dr.Steiner
> > > >predicted for the end of the 20th century.than
> > >
> > > >And boy oh boy, do we have scores to settle!!!
> > >
> > > >Tom
> > >=========================
> > Hi Scott,
> > Thank you so much for your contribution here. I certainly more
> > resemble that remark. It kind of fits me to a "T", doesn't it?The T
> > for Tom!us
> > Plus Brian Gray and I were classmates together back when both of
> > were attending Rudolf Steiner College in the early 80's, so,from that
> > spirit-rich environment, I also learned exactly which sacreduse.
> > proportions of which alchemical "gunpowder and nitroglycerine"
> > elements, as it were, to custom make those projectiles for later
> > Let's just say that Brian Gray would have many more stories to
> > about me than I would about him, only because he behaved sogoodly
> > while I behaved so badly. And it's human nature to remember muchmore
> > vividly the "behaving badly" stories than the "behaving goodly"was
> > ones.
> > So here I had built up this stockpile of "Platotelian" WMD's but
> > so frustrated because I really had no outlet for my destinycalling.
> > And then, in the mid 90's, along came the Internet.act as a
> > And I've been in "hog heaven" ever since.
> > By the way, Scott, since you brought this up, maybe you could
> > kind of unofficial scorekeeper. To be karmically fair, I shouldlob
> > grenades equally into both camps. I would request you to let meknow
> > if you feel I am bombing too much of one side and too little thewhere
> > On the other hand, perhaps equality is an abstract ideological
> > consideration because my own sense is that I throw the bombs
> > they are karmically needed, and that means that I may have todestructivity
> > concentrate on one camp for a long time.
> > Anyway thanks again for unlurking. I hope my Scorpionic
> > will be right kind of spiritual demolition work that opens up the
> > forum and the field for some new anthroposophical thinking and
> > Tom