Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Progress

Expand Messages
  • gaelman58
    Tam wrote: Therefore, I would like to say now that Rudolf Steiner is not a Bigot. He is not a Racist. But he is a Racialist. Well Tam, would ye call that a
    Message 1 of 1 , Nov 28, 2007
    View Source
    • 0 Attachment
      Tam wrote:
      "Therefore, I would like to say now that Rudolf Steiner is not a Bigot.
      He is not a Racist. But he is a Racialist."

      Well Tam, would ye call that a bit o' maral progress? Because, it
      seems to me, that you've had, over time, that particular hitch in your
      gitalong...that is, absence of the moral dimension of what Steiner had
      to say...surely, discussion about race and racial characteristics can
      be objective, can't they?...such and such is true, such and such is
      not...and the word "spiritual" is not synonymous with either "good"
      or "moral".

      Tarjei's metaphor about meals is appropriate...you're not feeding
      people sustenance...Ok, if you suppose the gospel indication, "feed my
      lambs" is not intended just for the guys in the funny hats but rather
      anyone, including yourself then you're obliged to take on the moral
      dimension in your offerings...(you'll recall Steiner's remarks about
      folks who reject Papal authority and make of themselves little
      popes)...

      Am I wrong in saying the following? If ever in the future you
      indicate to anyone that Steiner is a racist...you'd be lying...because
      evidently you know better...Gman
    Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.