Loading ...
Sorry, an error occurred while loading the content.

Distinguishing Bigotry and Racism

Expand Messages
  • tmasthenes13
    I take the liberty here of posting from the WC Archives, a message from James Marshall Knight, Ph.D.--- one that he submitted 5 years ago on the subject of
    Message 1 of 35 , Oct 28 10:51 PM
      I take the liberty here of posting from the WC Archives, a message
      from James Marshall Knight, Ph.D.--- one that he submitted 5 years ago
      on the subject of distinguishing racism from bigotry. He includes some
      quite telling observations about how teachers treat children of
      different races in very different, mostly unconscious ways.


      Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2002
      From: "J. Marshall Knight"
      Subject: Re: Stunted imagination

      The racist topic comes up quite often on this list. There is a lack
      of communication about how racism is transmitted in Waldorf schools.
      Moreover, there is apparent confusion about racism vs. bigotry. One
      can be a racist without being a bigot.

      When I review my son's stay at a Waldorf school, I begin anew beating
      myself up. It was not until I read Cosmic Memory, (He was in the
      eighth grade then.) that I comprehended the racism inherent in Waldorf
      stemming from Anthroposophy. In CM Steiner lays out the folk soul
      stuff that many Waldorf teachers apparently believe and practice. I
      know this because I attempted to talk to "lead' teachers who were
      steeped in Anthroposophy about what I had read. Their responses were
      something like: "Steiner could see into the akashic records and that
      is what he saw."

      The folk soul stuff and the manner in which "ancient history" is
      taught are key to Waldorf's racism. There is no getting around it.
      Their continued teaching of the Nordic myths, filled with Nordic
      heroes and avoiding as much as they can teaching about heroes and
      heroines in other cultures should tell you something.

      When Ancient India, Ancient Persia, Ancient Egypt, etc. are taught the
      slant is on the thread of the Aryans that brought forward the
      "spiritual truths" from Atlantis. One of the books that is used as
      background thinking for this "history" is Edouard Shure's book "THE
      GREAT INITIATES." (If you have not already done so I suggest strongly
      that you do so.) Racism is taught in this history by idolizing one
      race and depreciating--giving less time to-- others.

      Here in America often Native American history is taught with a bias
      toward the White man's plight. Just as you learned about racism
      through osmosis without anyone actually telling you, this is how
      children who attend Waldorf are learning it. They are not necessarily
      learning how to hate, they are learning superiority of one race over
      another just as the Anthroposophers see it and Steiner wrote about it.
      This superiority mindset could be negated easily if only they would
      teach children how to observe and think for themselves and not through
      the Steiner/Waldorf lens.

      If you look closely at the Waldorf class room, especially in the
      fourth and fifth grades, and ask questions about the roots of the
      history and why it is taught as it is you may come away with a totally
      different attitude about racism in Waldorf. Racism IMHO is
      perpetuated through so called "holy" books and here I include all of
      Steiner's books. (His followers treat them as such.) People who are
      steeped in the religion of a holy book usually will not question what
      the book says about anything let alone the superiority of their race
      over others. It is sad but I think Waldorf students learn in effect
      how to observe and relate to the races according to the way Steiner
      has laid out his race theory.

      I think many Anthroposophists on this list get their ire up because
      they associate racism with bigotry. This is not to be overlooked.
      There are many racial bigots and I think Steiner's race theory bodes
      well with these people. There are people who, I believe, have their
      children in Waldorf just because they perceive the racism in it. I
      personal do not care what another person's racial attitudes are. I do
      care if those attitudes interfere with others, especially my children.

      However, as I intimated above, if you want to really examine
      racism in the Waldorf movement, you will have also to examine the
      mindsets of the teachers. Many of them carry Steiner's madness with
      them. Those of you who have been around Waldorf teachers, especially
      kindergarten teachers who have had multicultural classrooms, you
      perhaps have observed the different treatments of kids from different

      You perhaps have observed that when an African American child is being
      "admired" the teacher will pat the child on the head, when an Asian or
      Hispanic child is likewise being admired the teacher will invariably
      pinch the child's cheeks, and when a Caucasian child is being admired
      the teacher will gently stroke the child under the chin or caress the
      child's face. They do this to the Caucasian child without adding the
      words "she's so cute" as they add with other races. (For those of you
      who are in other countries, please forgive this American slant here.)

      I agree that there are teachers and families involved in Waldorf who
      despise racism in any form. However, I do not believe they will take
      a stance against Waldorf teaching practices. They want to believe in
      the New Age tenets of Waldorf where people are evolving and getting
      beyond pettiness. From what we are discovering genetically about us
      humans, it is extremely petty to continue to advocate for and teach
      the superiority of one race over another. Ford Motor Company had a TV
      advertisement that said: "The closer you look the better we look."
      The opposite is true for Waldorf. Please look closer.

      J. Marshall

      "Mistakes live in the neighborhood of truth and therefore delude
    • gaelman58
      ... Au contraire, Monsieur Forgeron...it is quite clever in a nit-picky sort of way... but hasn t a clue when it comes to nuance...as a creature of will it has
      Message 35 of 35 , Nov 2, 2007
        --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "Frank Thomas Smith"
        <eltrigal78@...> wrote:
        > --- In anthroposophy_tomorrow@yahoogroups.com, "winters_diana"
        > <diana.winters@> wrote:
        > >
        > > Frank:
        > >
        > > > Ten years ago, when we started the rural W-school here, I was
        > talking
        > > > to the parents and introduced a teacher who had volunteered to
        > teach
        > > > German free of charge (until she found another - paying - job it
        > > > turned out). A mother raised her hand and asked: "Why German"? I
        > thought that she might be Jewish and was referring to Germany's
        > > > history, so I said something about German being one of the modern
        > > > world's important languages and culturally and pedagogically
        > > > significant, bla, bla. The came my cruncher though: And this
        > German
        > > > teacher is Jewish! The mother stared at me in bewilderment. "So
        > what,"
        > > > she said. "What I mean is: Who not Quechua?" (a native indigenous
        > > > language, almost extinct.) Silence. Then I asked. "Do you know a
        > > > Quechua teacher?" She didn't. "So we'll teach German," I
        > said.
        > > > Moral: It ain't so easy.
        > >
        > Diana: Frank, it is fascinating to speculate on what you think this
        > story
        > > signifies.
        > F: Read, Diana, just read what I wrote. My post was in reference to
        > what JoAnn wrote about teaching Native American, African etc stuff
        > in schools. SO...what I think this story signifies is what I
        > wrote: "IT AIN'T SO EASY." I put it in caps in case you need to
        > upgrade your glasses.
        > The mind boggles.
        > Frank: Diana, your mind has been boggling ever since I've known you.
        > Nothing new.
        > D: The parent who questioned why German must
        > > have been Jewish?
        > F: In fact I wrote: "I thought that she *might* be Jewish and was
        > referring to Germany's history,..." So why do you continuously
        > misquote - at least me? The last time you said I agreed
        > that "earthy" is racist, when I actually said the opposite. You
        > apologized, I accepted...but here you go again. How about paying
        > attention.
        > D: Hello?
        > F: Hello? what?
        > D: The "cruncher" was that the German teacher was
        > > Jewish! How to fathom such a thing? I don't know how you make
        > sense of
        > > it all Frank, the world is just so complicated eh?
        > F: The world is complicaed, yeah; the story isn't though if you'd
        > use only an ounce of the neurons God gave you.
        > Frank

        Au contraire, Monsieur Forgeron...it is quite clever in a nit-picky
        sort of way... but hasn't a clue when it comes to nuance...as a
        creature of will it has motives but probably without any insight into
        them at all...so, it doesn't have a clue with respect to what
        motivates you with regard to sharing an anecdote.

        It would recognize that the world is complicated...but not
        qualitatively nuanced...it has no appreciation of the quite human
        situation in which you were in...don't you remember the story about
        the kid in the Red Sox uniform?...it actually thought the story was
        about it...you mention "neurons", it will assume you think that brain
        and mind are the same thing.

        Ok, maybe you don't want to be a mean fucker...then spoon feed it...in
        this, Sardonicus will prove useless...G.
      Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.