Re: The Superior Man
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "gaelman58"
> --- In email@example.com, "Mike helsher"
> <mhelsher@> wrote:
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "gaelman58"
> > <gaelman58@> wrote:
> > >
> > He doesn't need to be right all the time, nor does he always
> > > > be always safe, cooperative and sharing, like an androgynous
> > Nice
> > > > Guy. He simply lives from his deepest core, fearlessly giving
> > > > gifts, feeling through the fleeting moment into the openness
> > > > existence, totally committed to magnifying love.
> > > >
> > > > ********************************************************
> > > >
> > > > Heart thinking premo!
> > > >
> > > > I'm especially interested in some Steiner lingo that might
> > to, orit
> > > > detract from these Ideas. Seems a bit Lucerfiric at first
> > But
> > > > there is a correlation to intuition, and then the letting go
> > is
> > > > so important to a more true form of living thinking.
> > > >
> > > > be well
> > > >
> > > > Mike
> > > > http://www.thewealthguardian.com/
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Mike: Do you really think Dieda and Hoff know any more about
> > thanget
> > > you do?
> > Yeah I think that Dieda does, but I'm catching up fast...:)
> > ...What Dieda does know is how to write a marketable book...I'd
> > > guess a string of workshops ensued...
> > Well the CD set is presented in a workshop format.
> > Hoff's conclusion is funny,
> > > "...some profound truths that will help you on your Path to a
> > fuller,
> > > richer life for yourself and your partner"....all one has to do
> > to
> > > get one's partner to accept that precept,
> > Well, My wifey has accepted it..:) I treat her Like the Goddess
> > she is now, with as much honesty from the heart as possible. I
> > interact with a devine feminine Goddess! What a difference! she's
> > beaming all the time, looks me in the eye with deep passion and
> > me more it seems, and grabs my ass even on occasion...:) so
> > somethings working!
> > "Your purpose must come
> > > before your relationship"...doik!...regards, G.
> > Seems you don't like it. fine by me!
> > Best
> > Mike
> > >
> Mike: Thanks for the response...a quote from Steiner that I think
> is germane to what we're talking about here... from "Love and its
> Mission in the World" p 109, "In the age of materialism it is
> exceedingly difficult to maintain this concept of compassion or
> in a true and right perspective. Many of you will realize that insexuality-
> our materialistic times this concept is distorted, in that
> materialism associates the concept of love so closely with
> with which, fundamentally, it has nothing whatsoever to do. Thatis
> a point where the culture of our day abandons both intelligence andI think the focus in the cd's that I listened is not on sex, or
> sound, healthy reason. Though its materialism, evolution in our
> time is veering not only toward the unintelligent and illogical but
> even toward the scandalous, when love is dragged into such close
> association with what is covered by the term 'sexuality'. The fact
> that under certain circumstances the element of sexuality may be
> associated with love between man and woman is no argument for
> bringing the all-embracing nature of love or compassion so close
> together with the entirely specific character of sexuality".
> Over a lifetime, I think the average thinking person comes to that
> conclusion from their experience...that is, sex is
> sex...relationships are relationships...and that's why it's not
> uncommon for older people to say, "Damn, if I knew then what I know
> As for the question of what one ought to do with repect to their
> sexuality...well, I remember the words of an initiate I read some
> years ago. He said that with respect to sexual conduct there isn't
> much difference between an initiate and a primitive...regards, G.
sexuality, but more on the play of the polarity between feminine and
masculine. He describes the feminine as "everything that changes; is
always moving; Love in motion; the flow of life it self". The
masculine is the depth of "unchanging, always was, always will be,
ultimate unenhancable freedom consciousness". Of course the two are
really one, but in our duelistic world, we get to experience both
sides of the coin at different times, and in different ways. A
reasonably well rounded person, male of female, can exibit both
masculine and femenine qualities. Personally, I think that always
being balanced in an intimate relationship just gets plain boring
after a while. Polarity allows for gravity, and electricity to flow.
Like wise, in a polarized relationship, love and consciousness tend
to flow, but only if the human made blocks (guardians of the
threshold)have been cleared. This is all really about the play of
energy and polarity in relation to the rolls that we choose to play
in our world, from a deep heart felt perspective. Many of which
aren't questioned and just unthinkingly assumed according to gender.
having listened to the cd set three times through, I don't think that
the over arcing message is out of tune with what RS wrote about. It
is not what I would call a "materialistic" perspective". He's got his
own jargon for sure, and I don't quite agree with the idea that "you
will never find your purpose in mind" that he puts forth. Though
there is alot of focus on what I would call heart thinking. but to
each his own.