Re: Neo-Nazi crap
- The Voice of the White House
Washington, D.C., February 26, 2007: "All his life, our President,
George W. Bush, has been a failure.
He is a weak man who has only survived because his family have
poured money into his business ventures, all of which failed.
He was, and still is, a binge drinker (he was blotto during Katrina)
who never outgrew the culture of the fraternity house, a very poor
student, dismissed from the National Guard for repeated truancies
and his excessive use of drugs and alcohol, a physically abusive
Because he was the scion of a prominent and wealthy Republican
family whose father had been head of the CIA, Vice President and
then a one-term President, George was jobbed into office by a cabal
that was determined to inflict their political and economic views on
what they viewed as an excessively liberal American public.
Like all weak men with severe image problems, Bush has proven to be
duplicitous to a degree, vicious, vindictive and pathologically
rigid in his actions.
But behind him stands the Vice President. Cheney is far more
intelligent that Bush and is a capable and very industrious person
but he is, to be blunt, a nut.
Dick Cheney is totally crazy, obsessed with power and his warped
image of a world-dominating United States , is a concept that has
been dead for years. Cheney, a man of great drive and possesses
neither scruples nor common sense, and is a man who loathes anything
connected with Russia because he believes, in error as usual, that
Russia is still run by Communists!
In his fantasy world, Cheney seeks out the support of any person or
group that he can use in his drive for American domination. AIPAC,
the Likudist neocons, the far religious right and the upper levels
of the American corporate world are all on his Rolodex.
Cheney appointed himself Vice President after a cabal had installed
Bush in the White House by a secret coup and at once began to fill
vital posts with his trusted allies such as Stephen Cambonne and
Cheney himself was responsible for instructions to torture and
maltreat any entity or person he personally deemed to be anti-
American and stopped just short of ordering such treatment for
Americans who opposed him. He has spawned enormous and divisive
hatred for Americans throughout the world and personally is
responsible for the increasing destruction of the American military
as a deterrent force.
His savage, unreasoning and vindictive nature has alienated most top
Republicans and now, it is increasingly obvious, the top levels of
American military leadership.
Now, the supposedly gullible American public is being treated to the
biggest lot of childish propaganda imaginable. Bush and the Israelis
are trying frantically to promote public support for an attack on
Iran. They have trotted out all kinds of silly faked stories; "Iran-
made bombs," "We are going to attack Iran next week," "Israel is
going to bomb Tehran," and on and on. I have something that Bush
does not: friends in the Pentagon and they have all told me that,
yes, there are plans to invade Iran on the books. There are also
plans to invade North Korea and other countries. However, we are not
going to do this because we can't. Bush and his gang have been
shriekinig `wolf! wolf" about North Korea for several years now,
issuing dire threats of military action if they don't dare to settle
with us on our terms. Once they, and the rest of the world, saw this
was just bluff, Bush lost a great deal of face,\. In desperation,
the propaganda machine came up with a whopper last week: North Korea
agreed to our terms! Of course they did not and this one fell as
flat as the rest of the bovine fecal matter gushing out of the White
None of this is of the slightest interest to Cheney who is in
constant daily contact with his weak president, issuing orders to
him, and everyone else in the White House. Cheney wants a war and
insists on getting it. Even if everyone else sees the Emperor has no
clothes, Cheney is oblivious.
Cheney is a purely evil man in the eyes of everyone but himself and,
even more than the weak and petulant President, must be removed at
once from the levers of power before he surely starts a major war
that will have appalling consequences."
- Tarjei wrote:
> I've found the old email, but half of it is missing -Okay, cool!
> it was on an old CD in a different format for Eudora,
> and it's barely readable. (I can see that I brought
> up the subject on the old "Spiritual Science" list in
> January 1999, which I recall brought on quite a stir with
> Bobby Matherne.) And the irony of it all is that the
> text disappears in the middle of this thing about
> Jung and Steiner, so I'll share what I have and add
> from memory. I'll be happy to contact Waage for a
> replay, but he may be out of town and out of country,
> because he hasn't been answering lately.
> What brought this up between Waage and myself inThank you for this, Tarjei.
> 1996 was the topic of Andrei Belyj - the Russian poet
> with that moving description of Rudolf Steiner at
> http://uncletaz.com/belyi.html which was also I
> think published at Frank's SCR -
> Anyway, Waage commands fluent Russian and has spent
> many years there, made his name as reporter in Norway
> because he's an expert on Russia and Russian literature,
> and then he's also an anthro and he flipped when I
> mentioned Belyj, whom he found very exciting, so he
> told me a lot of stuff - such as the guy (Belyj) wrote
> eight autobiographies, including his book about Steiner
> and Blok, and one of those had been published in 1992:
> "Geheime Aufzeichnungen. Erinnerungen an das Leben
> im Umkreis Rudolf Steiners".
> This book is a strange rendition of some sort of psychotic
> breakdown that happened to Belyj while he was in Dornach -
> and Waage says this book "was written ten years later with
> a little eerie absolute faith in the reality of something
> that must have been hallucinations and distorted perceptions
> (about anthroposophical spies who climb the trees outside
> his window, for instance.) I myself am waiting for the
> publication of a three volume cultural history that Belyj
> wrote, and that are lying in the archives in Moscow.
> One gets kind of full of his autobiographies after a while."
> Waage then talks about Magnus Ljunggren's doctoral thesis,
> a study about Belyj he recommends, this study is about Belyj
> and Steiner, but because Ljunggren is a convinced Freudian,
> he views the entire relationship as a wish by Belyj for a
> homo-erotic fructification of Steiner(!). The book still has
> lots of important information. In 1994 another book by
> Ljunggren had been published about a friend and later
> polemical opponent of Belyj, namely Emil Medtner:
> "The Russian Mephisto". Big parts of this book are about
> Belyj and Steiner, and then there is what Waage calls
> "the raisin inside the sausage": Namely that while Belyj
> had found his teacher in Steiner, Medtner had found his
> teacher in Jung. And here the old 1996 email text breaks,
> so what I recall is that when Belyj and Medtner were
> friends, Belyj would fill Medtner with anthroposophy and
> make an anthro out of him more or less, perhaps by bringing
> him along to Steiner's lectures. And then later, when
> Medtner became Jung's patient and pupil or whatever and
> went into psychotherapy with him, he gave him all this
> anthro-babble he had picked up from Belyj, or perhaps some
> of it directly from Steiner when attending his lectures.
> So there he is, Medtner on Jung's couch (I guess) with
> his eyes closed being instructed to talk about his childhood
> (I guess) and he gives him anthro-babble - the cosmology
> and the full package. And Jung writes all this down,
> fascinated, and he develops his theory of dreams and
> symbols and such, indirectly inflence by Steiner through
> Belyj and Medtner!
> That's all I've got on this. This is basement stuff, man,
> because it's so rumorous sort of, and it's something I bet
> the Hole Dwellers would like to get their teeth into some
> of it, so I hope I haven't been one of the hens in that
> feather story but simply repeated faithfully what I've heard :)
> Frank wrote:That's very interesting, too. Frank, today I've been reading from
> Jung never mentioned Steiner in his writings (as far as I
> know) and didn't even accept the possibility of reincarnation
> until nearly the end of his life (Dreams, Memories, Reflections.)
hypnotherapist Michael Newton's book, "Life Between Lives." A few
things came to my attention. One of them is something he calls
Atlantis Attraction, which involves conscious thoughts that interfere
with the subconscious unfolding of details about lives lived in the
past. In this case, a client might have learned a great deal about a
particular period in history, "a conscious attraction to certain well-
known events and familiar myths." He says that when these attractive
aspects of the past drive memory and distort recall, the need to
disengage conscious thought interference arises. He does this by
asking the client to pause (while under hypnosis) to review his or
her memories, to verify location. This can push away the conscious
thoughts and open the channel to the unconscious. He says faulty
reporting also arises out of something he calls Famous Person
Syndrome. He tells about three Marilyn Monroe cases he had; in one of
these, the client came to realize she was not a reincarned Marilyn
but instead a housekeeper for the actress.
And here is something else interesting: "In life between lives
regression, the good news is that once in the spirit world the
conscious mind does not seem to interfere to any great degree with
the superconscious except when reviewing past life incarnations."
A little later on, he says: "Truths may initially be clouded by
desired fantasies, strong belief systems, repressed fears, or simply
unhappiness with a current life the client thinks is dull."
Then: "Memories that you suspect are faulty through conscious
misconceptions can be handled by gentle challenging of critical
questioning." (The words "conscious misconceptions" stand out here.)
And just one more thing, he emphasizes the need to do something that
reminds me of the idea of reframing, or "thickening" a too-thin
story: "Moving back and forth in various time frames while going over
the same ground is effective."
I don't know, you may or may not find this of value. For some reason,
I'm fascinated by these ideas.
Cheers from the couch,
> Sweet non-Jungian dreams,