Re: Spiritual Science from a slightly different angle.
- I say: "I am an anthroposophist, therefore the paths my thoughts
follow are always the right ones and always enlightened."
It follows logically: "Other people are not anthroposophists,
therefore their thoughts are probably wrong most of the time and not
Just saying that one is an anthroposophist does nothing at all.
Doing the work might get you there (wherever there is).
I can read anthroposophical materials over and over and over again,
but derive the wrong sort of thoughts from the materials and end up
acting luciferic or ahrimanic or just plain old-fashioned stupid.
It is quite possible to derive some great enlightenment from other
sources than anthroposophy.
All that said, I think you are not entirely wrong, Mike T., just
suffering from an excess of broad generalizations.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Mike T"
> Thanks Franky,
> I think amongst Anthroposophists one doesn't need to beat about
> You're either with it, or you don't really get it - in simplisticterms.
> Anthroposophy, because it is the truth, has stood the test oftime. Most
> other thought systems are shadow copies of Anthroposophy, orancient relics
> of wisdom, or mere delitante and crass (such as SwaggertTeleevangelist), or
> downright as you say, inspired by fallen beings - such as Islam -(which
> some on this list would say was inspired by GabriEL, howeveractually was
> the shadow there-of, a fallen being).slightly
> Yes I don't want to debate the futile or stupid. What is is.
> Again thanks for your post.
> Mike T
> >From: "eurythmy" <eurythmy@...>
> >Reply-To: email@example.com
> >To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >Subject: Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Spiritual Science from a
> >different angle.hierarchies. Are you
> >Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 09:36:08 +0100
> >Dear Mike,
> >May be I see what you mean with Anthroposophy given by
> >referring to Michael?Ahriman,
> >For a lot of Gurus etc they can well be inspired by Lucifer and
> >which are both high ranked in Hierarchies,are they higher thanMichael?
> >It all reminds me of children in the play ground: my father hasthis job,
> >or that car and the other child answers but my father has thatone it
> >I think it is all a matter of individual choice, individual
> >With the way each one implements its own choice he/she willensure what is
> >enduring and will become the reality.waiting for our
> >Some hierarchies are manipulating, influencing us; some are
> >deeds , feelings and thoughts.slightly
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mike T
> > To: email@example.com
> > Sent: Monday, September 04, 2006 7:51 AM
> > Subject: RE: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Spiritual Science from a
> >different angle.so back,
> > Hi Dottie,
> > Sorry, I disagree; Anthroposophy as I wrote first up a year or
> >isthrough Steiner
> > the university of spiritual matters and was given to us
> > the Heirarchies. Why try and reduce it down to the other
> > systems that continue to manifest and cloud that which the
> >worldbut Tarjei
> > earnestly wants mankind to wake up to. My meaning was clear
> >asGoetheist) and
> > always wants to tear everything down word by word (hardly
> > lose sight of the real meaning. I could go on, but I'm notinterested to
> > discuss these matters with someone of Tarjeis ilk is not ofgood faith.
> > Cheers,2Eninemsn%2Ecom%2Eau%2Fclickthru%2Fclickthru%2Eact%3Fid%3Dninemsn%
> > M
> > Recent Activity
> > a.. 2New Members
> > Visit Your Group
> > Yahoo! Avatars
> > Create a Face
> > Show your style in
> > Messenger & more.
> > Ads on Yahoo!
> > Learn more now.
> > Reach customers
> > searching for you.
> > Yahoo! 360°
> > Get Started
> > Create your page
> > Share your life
> > .
> 1000s of Sexy Singles online now at Lavalife. Click here
>>> Having children `at our disposal for demonstration'!!!!!I am not sure if I want to read on :( :(
Hello Adrian. Personally, between translations and the time period, I
wouldn't put any merit to the words "at our disposal". Could be as
well you're simply not interested in reading on, which is fine of