Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Southern Cross Review -- Upton Sinclair Edition
- --- lightsearcher1 <lightsearcher1@...> wrote:
> Frank,I beg to differ. You wrote about Southern Cross Review
> Permission is not granted to you (by me) for
> reproduction of posts
> (of mine) to this restricted membership forum.
> Permission is denied, but you will likely do it
> anyway -- (you know,
> for "the cause").
> This concerns the issue of intent, intended
> readership, and, well,
> ethics, which I hope you'll understand.
of which I am publisher and editor. In effect,
therefore, you wrote to me, in which case I can do
whatever I damn well please with what you write (throw
it in the toilet, fe, which is what I already did,
just wanted to see your reaction, and you bit, good
for me). On the other hand, I don't blame you for
being ashamed of what you wrote, I certainly would be.
Although it doesn't make any difference anyway, since
you're anonymous, i.e, too cowardly to use your name
even on this list which, btw, is not a "restricted
membership forum". Anyone, even comedians like you,
can come and go as they please and write whatever shit
they please, and drown in it.
Happy New Year,
Frank (rank and serial number upon request)
Frank Thomas Smith
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.