Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Ad hominems/non sequitors
- Yo, Gaelbaby,
You seem to have missed the part where Hale whinged on about how of course I
wouldn't read what he had to say and any road, both Frank and I thought he was
so crazed even the DSM-IV wouldn't have a category for him. Of course, maybe
you considered that a sequitor.
OTOH, it *is* true that I have a soft spot for big Irish fellas.... Ah,
Gaelman, you've got to stop littering up the joint... broken hearts all over
the landscape... *twinkle*
Musings apropos of nothing...
--- gaelman58 wrote:
> Bradford to Gaelman: Oh yeah? Well, priests abuse teenagers.
> Sister Jo to Hale: I don't read you...except when I read you.
> H to SJ: Well, you're a witch, eh?
> FTS to G: Although you're stupid enough to still practice
> Catholicism, sometimes you get it right by accident.
> B to H: How could you possibly know what was in the mind of the Christ?
> SJ to Lightsearcher: Oh yeah? Well you guys have thugs too!
> Yet, some good stuff:
> FTS to the women: I loves ya baby.
> Women to FTS: We loves ya too. sweetness...but in the recesses of our
> intuitive hearts suspect that Gaelman might well be able to...well,
> you know what those kinds of guys do well.