Re: Yust imagine, Chica/Post 18721
- --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, dottie zold
> Gaelman:Gaelman cuts to the quick with this keen observation, while Dottie
> > Well Dottie that thesis (Daughter Voice) would be a
> > rather important
> > truth...and when one thinks of all of the important
> > revelations that
> > have come to us from from Steiner...you'd think he
> > would have been
> > explicit about that.
> I think he was explicit for those who have embarked
> on this specific study of what I am terming as Mother
> God and others may term as Sophia. And it's clearly
> stated in the Fifth Gospel if one allows the
> indications to sit within, in my opinion. I also think
> in the Isis Mary Sophia book I am reading it is really
> clear as well if we look at the understanding of the
> New Isis.
> I looked at when Dr. Steiner spoke on these things
> with frequency, and it seems at two points: 1913 and
> 1922. I think they are very interesting years for what
> Anthroposophy was creating in those moments.
> All good things,
retorts with typical political aplomb. Now, my understanding is
that Irina Gordienko addresses much of the matter herein in a book
that could just as well be titled: "Irina Gordienko and the Denuding
of the Anthroposofia Prokofieffia".
And being written in a year in which we had Heidt's "Initiative To
All", and MacCoun's "Work On What's Been Spoiled", it would appear
that 1997 was a really good year. Two years later she was dead,
Heidt's initiative was hearsay, and MacCoun was "Thee Womaan". Big
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around