Re: Tutor or educator?:[Was Steiner an "occult scientist" and "mystic"?]
- --- In email@example.com, Tarjei Straume
> At 15:28 01.06.2005, Pete wrote:arguments to
> > > Projecting and echoing again, I see. Some sort of knee-jerk defense
> > > mechanism. I do agree with some of the others here who remind you
> >that your
> > > posts are very boring.
> > >
> >So are your responses. Your knee-jerk reaction is to criticize the
> >messenger when the message gets too real. It's obvious what you do -
> >and boring.
> You have no message, Pete. That's why you relapse into parroting.
> > > Schools don't lie, but individuals do.
> >Tired argument Tarjei. Even boring I might say.
> You're repeating your parroting because you have no rational
> offer, only old PLANS propaganda.scholls
> > > With Waldorf schools spread all over
> > > the world, there are probably untruthful imdividuals in Waldorf
> > > like in any other schools.the whole
> >No, not like in any other schools.
> So there are no untruthful individuals employed in any schools in
> world except Waldorf. I rest my case - again.You haven't made a case - except to prove that you will not read and
address what is being said.
- At 15:32 03.06.2005, Pete wrote:
>Steiner was neither a scientist or an educator and that's the difference.According to what authority? Yours? PLANS' The Pope? Or are you just
playing Scrabble again, making up your own rules as you go along?