Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] Re: Tutor or educator?:[Was Steiner an "occult scientist" and "mystic"?]
- At 15:28 01.06.2005, Pete wrote:
> > Projecting and echoing again, I see. Some sort of knee-jerk defenseYou have no message, Pete. That's why you relapse into parroting.
> > mechanism. I do agree with some of the others here who remind you
> > posts are very boring.
>So are your responses. Your knee-jerk reaction is to criticize the
>messenger when the message gets too real. It's obvious what you do -
> > Schools don't lie, but individuals do.You're repeating your parroting because you have no rational arguments to
>Tired argument Tarjei. Even boring I might say.
offer, only old PLANS propaganda.
> > With Waldorf schools spread all overSo there are no untruthful individuals employed in any schools in the whole
> > the world, there are probably untruthful imdividuals in Waldorf scholls
> > like in any other schools.
>No, not like in any other schools.
world except Waldorf. I rest my case - again.
"Against stupidity the gods themselves are powerless."
- At 15:32 03.06.2005, Pete wrote:
>Steiner was neither a scientist or an educator and that's the difference.According to what authority? Yours? PLANS' The Pope? Or are you just
playing Scrabble again, making up your own rules as you go along?