Re: [anthroposophy_tomorrow] To Mike T
- Hey Tarjei,
Pete has been very uncompromising when it comes to
speaking about how wacked Anthroposohy is and uses his
children to show it. He or others may not be aware of
that this is a using of sorts to achieve his own goals
it is. His role as a father is not to put his chldrens
supposed behavoiurs online. If my father had done that
I would be humiliated. I imagine his c hildren don't
read PLANS so they may not be aware of how their
father has portrayed them. I have spoken to Pete about
this at PLANS and told him it was an outrage that he
dragged his children into this. And he agreed.
It is one thing to speak on what you disagree with and
quite another to out their most inner feelings on line
to get his point across. I get is it is a fine line
and it is one I had to learn from my first trip to
PLANS three or so years back. He has since shown a
greater reluctance to bring them in and I appreciate
that as a daughter who has been through the divorce
I reminded him whether or not he is happy about the
divorce or what have you those ladies are his family
and he should at least uphold that protective part in
front of the world versus leaving them open for
discussion. He has spoken not so kindly of his wife
through little insinuations and such and Mike T hasn't
slandered him because he has involved them when it
suited him and become outraged when what he wrote was
responded to. It's mostly my experience of him on line
whereas he seems to say whatever he wants but all hell
is set up when someone holds him accountable to what
he has stated. He only wants to say it and be heard
and have it accepted as truth. We all know divorce is
sticky. And unfortuately Pete is in the thick of it
and speaks at times of a court case and so forth.
Although, again, he is much better at it and I also
recognize it takes a while to get used to not using
others experiences to justify what I am trying to
And, I am done with the conversation. I just wanted to
jump in and just say that Mike hasn't slandered anyone
and if anyone wanted to take the time to check the
story out they would indeed find what I have shared
above to be true.
Now, onto Shekinah :) in my next post. I am sure you
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
- --- In email@example.com, "dottie zold"
> Pete:Dottie - I'm not going to explain this to you. Please learn to read
> > You're confusing Anthroposophy with Waldorf here. I'd like you to
> > point to a reference here.
> Pete over at the critics:
> Let me ask you - if Waldorf schools are not trying to
> promote Anthroposophy, to
> produce Anthroposophists, then why have morning
> Okay Pete, so who's confusing Waldorf with Anthroposophy here? Had to
> go back and just double check my reference for such comments thrown my
> way by you that 'Anthroposophy and Waldorf are not one and the same
> Dottie, what don't you understand about that'? Well, Pete, I'd like to
> know whay 'you' don't understand about that?
and understand what you are reading. You are a waste of my time.