Lazarus & Mary Magdalene
- Dottie you wrote:
"Not the way it comes to me. If you look for Lazarus in
the way you looked for Magdalene I do not believe you
will find him. I find nothing. And I have looked. If
this is true in regards to a Lazarus one with
spiritual insight should be able to access this being,
I believe. I don't think one can."Dottie, are you saying here that you are accessing the Akashic Records and that you do not find Lazarus at the foot of the Cross. How do you reconcile that with Steiner's findings. He makes it all to clear that Lazarus was there and that he did write the Gospel of John while at the same time separating out Mary Magdalene as another individual all together who through her act of washing the feet of Christ Jesus she prepared herself to develop the inner soul capacity to perceive the Resurrected Christ. Please read the final pages of lecture XII of the Hamburg cycle on the Gospel of John because you and Rudolf Steiner are certainly at odds on this issue.You then wrote:
"I believe it was Magdalene and Mother Mary that were
on that isle if it was so."Again, I would have to run this up against all that RSteiner had ever said in all of his lectures on the Apocalypse. I think that I have read everyone that has ever been published in English and I don't recall him even intimating this.These points require some exact clarification.rick distasi
> Lazarus-John didn't only write the Fourth Gospel, but also theApocalypse.
> These most profound and sublime documents of all time could only bewritten
> by someone who had been personally initiated by Christ Himself:Lazarus.
I am inspired to write a 'scholarly' :) piece on this today. In this
I would like to say Magdalene was also initiated by Christ. There is
absolutely no way around it. I am not sure if your comment means that
only Lazarus was initiated by Christ, does it?
Not only this but this week the headline for the Christmas Time
Magazine was Magdalene. Kind of interesting beings it usually is the
Mother Mary and the Babe. My friend saw the cover on my desk and
mentioned 'boy that looks like Mona Lisa'. And you know what, he is
right. So, got to thinking which led me to Da Vincis Mona Lisa. Now
reading the novel, The Da Vinci Codes something interesting it
brought out by known art scholars and that is that the picture is
actually considered a male/female painting. Magdalene: male/female.
Now, obviously this does not mean that I am right regarding Magdalene
however these little points will keep coming up till we get it about
this Feminine Mystery that was hidden by the Church. Peter was the
outer church and Magdalene represents the inner church.
I am going to pull this together in a little paper. I do not believe
it goes against anything Dr. STeiner said. I do believe that as
students we are not to stop at his death with the things he shared
with us. We are to go further or we are stuck in the mud. He hinted
that the Feminine Mysteries are going to be unveiled and they are. He
did not say who represented them although he did hint at it. If we
read his works between the lines, like we do the Bible, we will come
to this truth.
Its funny because a thought just came to me about John/Lazarus
writing the Fourth Gospel. Usually Mother Mary is not considered an
ispirant yet she is considered to have lived with this John. Now
suddenly people are starting to say John was inspired by living with
the Holy Mother intimating that it is a book by both in a sense.
People are starting to feel this Magdalene/Daughter intuitive energy
because they are acknowledging her in a sense. It is so readily
available to one who seeks.