49963Re: Sister's Progress And Relapses (was: Hatred, Untruthfulness, and Alzheimer)
- Apr 2, 2012Tarjei,
I try kind-of hard to give people the benefit of the doubt, especially these days; so I am sorry if and apparently for misunderstanding you.
I wasn't being dirty, in any event.
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "elfuncle" <elfuncle@...> wrote:
> I've get it, Myla. I wrote:
> "Our Beloved Sister may have a strong aversion to Paul because of
> something that happened to her in the Middle Ages, perhaps in a dark and
> scary church with sinister ministers, and this may be the reason for
> this sudden backsliding, but if she can overcome this, salvation and
> bliss is beckoning her."
> In the Middle Ages there were inquisitions in Europe, and anti-heresy
> campaigns. Some people were burned at the stake in worst case scenarios,
> but they were relatively few, and witch-burning didn't really become an
> epidemic until the 17th century, in the Modern Age. But it was unlawful
> for any Christian to be a heretic. (Non-Christians, especially Jews,
> were exempt.) The clergy roaming the countryside to investigate reports
> and rumors of heresy could immensely feared. I don't know why our
> Beloved Sister has such a very bad attitude about medieval Europe, but
> she may have been a heretic. The most horrible thing the church fathers
> did in the early Middle Ages was the murder of Hypatia in March 415,
> which Steiner described in terrible detail. the Hypatia individuality
> lived in the 19th century as Helena Blavatsky, and her strong antipathy
> against Christianity was probably due to how she had died in her former
> existence. The Hypatia/Blavatsky individuality was an occultist,
> however, a very gifted clairvoyant in both of these incarnations, so she
> has nothing to do with our Beloved Sister.
> Still, my mention of medieval sinister ministers was meant to to hint at
> heresy, inquisition, church authority, correct theological beliefs and
> so on, and perhaps being questioned by them in dark church basements,
> but I didn't think about rape at all. Your mind is even dirtier than
> --- In email@example.com, "elfuncle" <elfuncle@>
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "Myla Robert
> > LeMaster-Gruber" mylalemaster@ wrote:
> > >
> > > The reference to being raped was going too far, man.
> > What reference to being raped? What am I missing here?
> > Tarjei
- << Previous post in topic