49948Re: Hatred, Untruthfulness, and Alzheimer (was: "Indescribably Sad and Pathetic")
- Apr 2, 2012"On the other hand, the karma of untruthfulness, especially deliberate, calculating and spiritually harmful untruthfulness with oneself at the center of attention, may also cause Alzheimer I believe."
Didn't respond to to this as I think most agree on Staudi's fundamental, unremitting dishonesty. But, as I read through my last posting on his website article on three-folding I am still amazed at the bare-faced, dishonest manipulative prose he produced that allowed him to think he'd demonstrated that Steiner supported WW1. There are many other instances of dishonesty on show, albeit somewhat less prominent: the whole farce of our discussion over Brendan Karch's PhD thesis on Upper Sillesia is a case in point. His karma has to be ultimately not good from this kind of behaviour, but I wouldn't like to say how it will take shape
--- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "elfuncle" <elfuncle@...> wrote:
> Ironically, there's one particular Sugar Cherub who won't develop
> dementia or Alzheimer or ulcers because of hate. I'm talking about PS,
> of course, or Der Staudi if you prefer, who is a different animal from
> the others because he seems not to be driven by hate, but by opportunism
> and desire for personal attention, and the passionate hatred among the
> others serves as an energy he is feeding off. He is also obsessed
> alright, but his obsession differs from the average Cherub in the sense
> that it's not really about Steiner and anthroposophy and Waldorf and
> esotericism, but about himself.
> I noticed that Dennis just called PS on exactly that point, and it
> wasn't unexpected that Dan (I don't have a code name for him yet), who
> is usually very slow to react, quite patient, jumped in immediately with
> an ad hom warning. The reason is very simple: From his very arrival in
> Sugarland 11 or 12 years ago, PS has been Dan's favorite and
> indispensable pet who is always welcomed with a red carpet VIP
> treatment. Why? Well, it's not merely his academic pretenses. The
> crucial reason is that prior to the arrival of PS, Dan was going solo
> with his Nazi War Dance. Nobody else, not even the most hardcore
> Cherubs, shared Dan's obsession with linking Steiner to Hitler and
> anthroposophy to Nazism in those days. In this field, PS has done a
> momentous amount of hard work that Dan could never dream of
> accomplishing. So PS is not only Dan's pet; he's his Golden Goose, and
> every post of his is a Golden Egg.
> So Dennis must immediately leave Dan's Golden Goose alone lest he get a
> week on the bench. This is what that murderous madman got (who is really
> honeysweet on the inside and ready for repentance and salvation someday,
> just like Son of Sam and the Hillside Strangler were), which means that
> criticizing Dan's Golden Pet is exactly as serious in his eyes as
> threatening to kill school teachers by gutting them like fishes. And it
> goes to show that Sune was nuked from Sugarland for calling PS a liar,
> and I left in disgust after Dan ad home-warned me for calling a
> statement of his a lie, although that was clearly an ad statementem and
> not an ad hominem.
> Like I said, PS isn't likely to develop Alzheimer, for instance, for the
> same reason as the others. He's bilingual for once, and he is obsessed
> by personal ambition and intellectual exhibitionism rather than
> passionate hatred. On the other hand, the karma of untruthfulness,
> especially deliberate, calculating and spiritually harmful
> untruthfulness with oneself at the center of attention, may also cause
> Alzheimer I believe. I'm not a medical researcher, but I'm thinking of a
> character like the late Elizabeth Claire Prophet. What PS can do to
> counteract this danger is to learn many more languages, perhaps, but
> that's what's expected of professional historians, so he's got his work
> cut out for him.
> --- In email@example.com, "ted.wrinch"
> <ted.wrinch@> wrote:
> > Yes, that was my point about the WC denizens shortly after I joined
> that group. The words in quotes, I expect everyone remembers, are her
> own that she directed against me for her own bizarre reasons. It's very
> clear from her comment this morning, and the general behaviour of
> others, that they are "feeding [their] own animosity against what [they]
> hate". It's not healthy and can only end in tears (or dementia - we've
> seen that multi-language ability may help protect against it; I'm sure
> it's only a matter of time before evidence becomes available indicating
> that hate induces it).
> > T.
> > Ted Wrinch
> > --- In firstname.lastname@example.org, "elfuncle" elfuncle@
> > >
> > > Yea -- what was it again? Something like, Why not celebrate and
> > > what you love instead of developing ulcers, high blood pressure, and
> > > dementia by feeding your own animosity against what you hate?
> > >
> > > Tarjei
> > >
> > > --- In email@example.com, "ted.wrinch"
> > > <ted.wrinch@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Over on WC, Diana has thanked Alicia for 'getting her day off to a
> > > great start' by pointing her to an article mocking the recent
> > > of homoeopathically potentised biodynamic wine glasses. What 'an
> > > indescribably sad and pathetic' person she must be to need to
> > > others in order to make herself and her day 'great'.
> > > >
> > > > T.
> > > >
> > > > Ted Wrinch
> > > >
> > >
- << Previous post in topic Next post in topic >>